Cargando…
The Costs and Benefits of Choice: Family Managers in Directly Funded Home Care
Directly funded (DF) home care, or consumer directed home care, gives program users a budget to choose their own services. Set in the Canadian province of Manitoba, our study examines the local DF program “Self and Family Managed Care”, which does not allow program users to hire and pay a family mem...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8680134/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1398 |
_version_ | 1784616682548887552 |
---|---|
author | Dansereau, Lisette Kelly, Christine Aubrecht, Katie Grenier, Amanda Williams, Allison |
author_facet | Dansereau, Lisette Kelly, Christine Aubrecht, Katie Grenier, Amanda Williams, Allison |
author_sort | Dansereau, Lisette |
collection | PubMed |
description | Directly funded (DF) home care, or consumer directed home care, gives program users a budget to choose their own services. Set in the Canadian province of Manitoba, our study examines the local DF program “Self and Family Managed Care”, which does not allow program users to hire and pay a family member. Incorporating a disability lens into care and aging studies, we share findings from a qualitative study based on 24 semi-structured interviews with DF users. We focus on the experiences of family managers, that is, representatives acting as a decision maker for an older adult. About half of the family managers in this study care for people living with dementia or cognitive decline. We identify two main themes: 1) service flexibility in DF reduces caregiver strain, 2) family managers tend to hire agencies rather than individuals to avoid administrative burden. Our discussion highlights the costs of DF from the perspective of caregivers as administrative burden (financial paperwork, finding workers, choosing a ‘good’ agency), and the benefits as flexibility (choosing workers, trusting workers, setting schedules, assigning work). We also consider the goals of family managers to enhance quality of life and avoid long-term residential care, in contrast to younger self-managers who desire control and autonomy. We recommend that DF programs need to reduce administrative work for users, support users in making informed choices, and find better ways to support, acknowledge and value the work of family managers and substitute decision makers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8680134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86801342021-12-17 The Costs and Benefits of Choice: Family Managers in Directly Funded Home Care Dansereau, Lisette Kelly, Christine Aubrecht, Katie Grenier, Amanda Williams, Allison Innov Aging Abstracts Directly funded (DF) home care, or consumer directed home care, gives program users a budget to choose their own services. Set in the Canadian province of Manitoba, our study examines the local DF program “Self and Family Managed Care”, which does not allow program users to hire and pay a family member. Incorporating a disability lens into care and aging studies, we share findings from a qualitative study based on 24 semi-structured interviews with DF users. We focus on the experiences of family managers, that is, representatives acting as a decision maker for an older adult. About half of the family managers in this study care for people living with dementia or cognitive decline. We identify two main themes: 1) service flexibility in DF reduces caregiver strain, 2) family managers tend to hire agencies rather than individuals to avoid administrative burden. Our discussion highlights the costs of DF from the perspective of caregivers as administrative burden (financial paperwork, finding workers, choosing a ‘good’ agency), and the benefits as flexibility (choosing workers, trusting workers, setting schedules, assigning work). We also consider the goals of family managers to enhance quality of life and avoid long-term residential care, in contrast to younger self-managers who desire control and autonomy. We recommend that DF programs need to reduce administrative work for users, support users in making informed choices, and find better ways to support, acknowledge and value the work of family managers and substitute decision makers. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8680134/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1398 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Dansereau, Lisette Kelly, Christine Aubrecht, Katie Grenier, Amanda Williams, Allison The Costs and Benefits of Choice: Family Managers in Directly Funded Home Care |
title | The Costs and Benefits of Choice: Family Managers in Directly Funded Home Care |
title_full | The Costs and Benefits of Choice: Family Managers in Directly Funded Home Care |
title_fullStr | The Costs and Benefits of Choice: Family Managers in Directly Funded Home Care |
title_full_unstemmed | The Costs and Benefits of Choice: Family Managers in Directly Funded Home Care |
title_short | The Costs and Benefits of Choice: Family Managers in Directly Funded Home Care |
title_sort | costs and benefits of choice: family managers in directly funded home care |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8680134/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dansereaulisette thecostsandbenefitsofchoicefamilymanagersindirectlyfundedhomecare AT kellychristine thecostsandbenefitsofchoicefamilymanagersindirectlyfundedhomecare AT aubrechtkatie thecostsandbenefitsofchoicefamilymanagersindirectlyfundedhomecare AT grenieramanda thecostsandbenefitsofchoicefamilymanagersindirectlyfundedhomecare AT williamsallison thecostsandbenefitsofchoicefamilymanagersindirectlyfundedhomecare AT dansereaulisette costsandbenefitsofchoicefamilymanagersindirectlyfundedhomecare AT kellychristine costsandbenefitsofchoicefamilymanagersindirectlyfundedhomecare AT aubrechtkatie costsandbenefitsofchoicefamilymanagersindirectlyfundedhomecare AT grenieramanda costsandbenefitsofchoicefamilymanagersindirectlyfundedhomecare AT williamsallison costsandbenefitsofchoicefamilymanagersindirectlyfundedhomecare |