Cargando…
Developing a Conversational Agent’s Capability to Identify Structural Wrongness in Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Model of Arguments
This article discusses the usefulness of Toulmin’s model of arguments as structuring an assessment of different types of wrongness in an argument. We discuss the usability of the model within a conversational agent that aims to support users to develop a good argument. Within the article, we present...
Autores principales: | Mirzababaei, Behzad, Pammer-Schindler, Viktoria |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8680349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34927062 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.645516 |
Ejemplares similares
-
An argumentation semantics for rational human evaluation of arguments
por: Cramer, Marcos, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Argumentation and explanation in the law
por: Rotolo, Antonino, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Argumentation: A calculus for Human-Centric AI
por: Dietz, Emmanuelle, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Evaluating and selecting arguments in the context of higher order uncertainty
por: Straßer, Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
EQRbot: A chatbot delivering EQR argument-based explanations
por: Castagna, Federico, et al.
Publicado: (2023)