Cargando…

AgingPLUS: Examining the Malleability of Implicit Views of Aging

AgingPLUS also examines whether the intervention can change participants’ implicit VOA. To that end, participants completed a lexical decision-making task (LDMT) and the Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) at baseline and post-intervention. One-way ANCOVAs with baseline scores as covariate were u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tseng, Heidi, Forsyth, Garrett, Nehrkorn-Bailey, Abigail, Rodriguez, Diana, Thompson, Kat, Diehl, Manfred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8680368/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1684
_version_ 1784616730980515840
author Tseng, Heidi
Forsyth, Garrett
Nehrkorn-Bailey, Abigail
Rodriguez, Diana
Thompson, Kat
Diehl, Manfred
author_facet Tseng, Heidi
Forsyth, Garrett
Nehrkorn-Bailey, Abigail
Rodriguez, Diana
Thompson, Kat
Diehl, Manfred
author_sort Tseng, Heidi
collection PubMed
description AgingPLUS also examines whether the intervention can change participants’ implicit VOA. To that end, participants completed a lexical decision-making task (LDMT) and the Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) at baseline and post-intervention. One-way ANCOVAs with baseline scores as covariate were used for these analyses. For LDMT, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding their post-intervention latencies for old-positive words, F(1,181) = 0.01, p = .60, old-negative words, F(1,181) = 0.43, p = .51, young-positive words, F(1,181) = 0.19, p = .67, and young-negative words, F(1,181) = 1.16, p = .28. For BIAT, both groups showed a slight preference for the young at baseline (mean d = 0.39), and post-intervention (mean d = 0.38). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding post-intervention d scores, F(1,181) = 0.002, p = .97. These preliminary findings suggest that in the current subsample, AgingPLUS did not significantly change participants’ implicit VOA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8680368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86803682021-12-17 AgingPLUS: Examining the Malleability of Implicit Views of Aging Tseng, Heidi Forsyth, Garrett Nehrkorn-Bailey, Abigail Rodriguez, Diana Thompson, Kat Diehl, Manfred Innov Aging Abstracts AgingPLUS also examines whether the intervention can change participants’ implicit VOA. To that end, participants completed a lexical decision-making task (LDMT) and the Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) at baseline and post-intervention. One-way ANCOVAs with baseline scores as covariate were used for these analyses. For LDMT, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding their post-intervention latencies for old-positive words, F(1,181) = 0.01, p = .60, old-negative words, F(1,181) = 0.43, p = .51, young-positive words, F(1,181) = 0.19, p = .67, and young-negative words, F(1,181) = 1.16, p = .28. For BIAT, both groups showed a slight preference for the young at baseline (mean d = 0.39), and post-intervention (mean d = 0.38). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding post-intervention d scores, F(1,181) = 0.002, p = .97. These preliminary findings suggest that in the current subsample, AgingPLUS did not significantly change participants’ implicit VOA. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8680368/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1684 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Tseng, Heidi
Forsyth, Garrett
Nehrkorn-Bailey, Abigail
Rodriguez, Diana
Thompson, Kat
Diehl, Manfred
AgingPLUS: Examining the Malleability of Implicit Views of Aging
title AgingPLUS: Examining the Malleability of Implicit Views of Aging
title_full AgingPLUS: Examining the Malleability of Implicit Views of Aging
title_fullStr AgingPLUS: Examining the Malleability of Implicit Views of Aging
title_full_unstemmed AgingPLUS: Examining the Malleability of Implicit Views of Aging
title_short AgingPLUS: Examining the Malleability of Implicit Views of Aging
title_sort agingplus: examining the malleability of implicit views of aging
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8680368/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1684
work_keys_str_mv AT tsengheidi agingplusexaminingthemalleabilityofimplicitviewsofaging
AT forsythgarrett agingplusexaminingthemalleabilityofimplicitviewsofaging
AT nehrkornbaileyabigail agingplusexaminingthemalleabilityofimplicitviewsofaging
AT rodriguezdiana agingplusexaminingthemalleabilityofimplicitviewsofaging
AT thompsonkat agingplusexaminingthemalleabilityofimplicitviewsofaging
AT diehlmanfred agingplusexaminingthemalleabilityofimplicitviewsofaging