Cargando…
Bone-Active Medication Utilization from 2013-2017 Amid Beneficiaries Aged 65+ with Medicare Part D by Provider Type
As the United States’ population increasingly consists of older adults aged 65+, an increase is expected in the prevalence of osteoporosis and the number of osteoporotic fractures. Bone-active medications (BAM) delay osteoporosis progression and prevent fragility fractures, but historically low trea...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8681012/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2321 |
_version_ | 1784616876316295168 |
---|---|
author | Kirk, Jennifer Fleming, Sean Orwig, Denise |
author_facet | Kirk, Jennifer Fleming, Sean Orwig, Denise |
author_sort | Kirk, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | As the United States’ population increasingly consists of older adults aged 65+, an increase is expected in the prevalence of osteoporosis and the number of osteoporotic fractures. Bone-active medications (BAM) delay osteoporosis progression and prevent fragility fractures, but historically low treatment persistence rates and drug utilization for BAM exist among at-risk older adults. This research assessed for differences in the BAM utilization rates over five-years in Medicare Part D by provider type: geriatric specialists (GERO), generalists, specialists, nurse practitioners (NP), and physicians’ assistants (PA). This longitudinal retrospective analysis included providers with at least one BAM prescription among beneficiaries aged 65+. An analysis of response profiles was used to model the mean BAM utilization rates overall and by provider group. Of the 50,249 providers included in this analysis, 88.15% were generalists, 5.76% specialists, 1.48% GERO, 2.73% NP, and 1.87% PA. From 2013-2017, the prevalence of BAM utilization was 6%. Over the five years, BAM utilization rates did not change significantly, but provider-specific rates were significantly different (F=12.53, p<.001). Provider-specific utilization rates were inconsistent with the highest utilization rates and most considerable variation observed among specialists (14.95%). PAs and NPs’ BAM utilization rates were stable at around 9.02% and 9.20%, but GERO and generalists exhibited the lowest utilization rates, 4.86% and 5.79%, respectively. While specialists had the higher-than-expected utilization rates, the overall and provider-specific BAM utilization rates were low and did not increase over time. Further research is needed to identify how provider-related factors, like geographic region and clinical training, influence underutilization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8681012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86810122021-12-17 Bone-Active Medication Utilization from 2013-2017 Amid Beneficiaries Aged 65+ with Medicare Part D by Provider Type Kirk, Jennifer Fleming, Sean Orwig, Denise Innov Aging Abstracts As the United States’ population increasingly consists of older adults aged 65+, an increase is expected in the prevalence of osteoporosis and the number of osteoporotic fractures. Bone-active medications (BAM) delay osteoporosis progression and prevent fragility fractures, but historically low treatment persistence rates and drug utilization for BAM exist among at-risk older adults. This research assessed for differences in the BAM utilization rates over five-years in Medicare Part D by provider type: geriatric specialists (GERO), generalists, specialists, nurse practitioners (NP), and physicians’ assistants (PA). This longitudinal retrospective analysis included providers with at least one BAM prescription among beneficiaries aged 65+. An analysis of response profiles was used to model the mean BAM utilization rates overall and by provider group. Of the 50,249 providers included in this analysis, 88.15% were generalists, 5.76% specialists, 1.48% GERO, 2.73% NP, and 1.87% PA. From 2013-2017, the prevalence of BAM utilization was 6%. Over the five years, BAM utilization rates did not change significantly, but provider-specific rates were significantly different (F=12.53, p<.001). Provider-specific utilization rates were inconsistent with the highest utilization rates and most considerable variation observed among specialists (14.95%). PAs and NPs’ BAM utilization rates were stable at around 9.02% and 9.20%, but GERO and generalists exhibited the lowest utilization rates, 4.86% and 5.79%, respectively. While specialists had the higher-than-expected utilization rates, the overall and provider-specific BAM utilization rates were low and did not increase over time. Further research is needed to identify how provider-related factors, like geographic region and clinical training, influence underutilization. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8681012/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2321 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Kirk, Jennifer Fleming, Sean Orwig, Denise Bone-Active Medication Utilization from 2013-2017 Amid Beneficiaries Aged 65+ with Medicare Part D by Provider Type |
title | Bone-Active Medication Utilization from 2013-2017 Amid Beneficiaries Aged 65+ with Medicare Part D by Provider Type |
title_full | Bone-Active Medication Utilization from 2013-2017 Amid Beneficiaries Aged 65+ with Medicare Part D by Provider Type |
title_fullStr | Bone-Active Medication Utilization from 2013-2017 Amid Beneficiaries Aged 65+ with Medicare Part D by Provider Type |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone-Active Medication Utilization from 2013-2017 Amid Beneficiaries Aged 65+ with Medicare Part D by Provider Type |
title_short | Bone-Active Medication Utilization from 2013-2017 Amid Beneficiaries Aged 65+ with Medicare Part D by Provider Type |
title_sort | bone-active medication utilization from 2013-2017 amid beneficiaries aged 65+ with medicare part d by provider type |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8681012/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2321 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirkjennifer boneactivemedicationutilizationfrom20132017amidbeneficiariesaged65withmedicarepartdbyprovidertype AT flemingsean boneactivemedicationutilizationfrom20132017amidbeneficiariesaged65withmedicarepartdbyprovidertype AT orwigdenise boneactivemedicationutilizationfrom20132017amidbeneficiariesaged65withmedicarepartdbyprovidertype |