Cargando…

Understanding Multidisciplinary-team Practice in Developing Home Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review

As widely used instruments to identify risk factors and lay out preliminary plans of how to improve the built environment, home assessment tools play an important role in the process of modifying homes for older adults. Developed by a variety of disciplines and tailored to meet various needs, home a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Mengzhao, Wilber, Kathleen, Pynoos, Jon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8681093/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2372
_version_ 1784616895070076928
author Yan, Mengzhao
Wilber, Kathleen
Pynoos, Jon
author_facet Yan, Mengzhao
Wilber, Kathleen
Pynoos, Jon
author_sort Yan, Mengzhao
collection PubMed
description As widely used instruments to identify risk factors and lay out preliminary plans of how to improve the built environment, home assessment tools play an important role in the process of modifying homes for older adults. Developed by a variety of disciplines and tailored to meet various needs, home assessment tools focus on features in homes and how they meet or hinder an older person’s ability to accomplish tasks — in other words, person-environment fit. Based on a comprehensive review of ten evidence-based home assessment tools identified by researchers at the USC Leonard Davis School of Gerontology and the National Council on Aging, we found that a common assessment strategy is the use of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) in developing and testing the assessment tools to ensure the reliability vs validity of different home modification programs. To understand the nature of MDT practice and derive a set of generalizable protocols for developing person-centered home assessment tools, we conducted a systematic analysis of the ten evidence-based home assessment tools and 41 peer-reviewed journal papers about how the tools were developed, used, and modified. In addition, we applied the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) to examine the use of MDTs in developing the tools and carrying out the programs. Based on our analysis, we propose a set of preliminary protocols for developing home assessment tools and a logic model for conducting person-centered home modification programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8681093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86810932021-12-17 Understanding Multidisciplinary-team Practice in Developing Home Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review Yan, Mengzhao Wilber, Kathleen Pynoos, Jon Innov Aging Abstracts As widely used instruments to identify risk factors and lay out preliminary plans of how to improve the built environment, home assessment tools play an important role in the process of modifying homes for older adults. Developed by a variety of disciplines and tailored to meet various needs, home assessment tools focus on features in homes and how they meet or hinder an older person’s ability to accomplish tasks — in other words, person-environment fit. Based on a comprehensive review of ten evidence-based home assessment tools identified by researchers at the USC Leonard Davis School of Gerontology and the National Council on Aging, we found that a common assessment strategy is the use of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) in developing and testing the assessment tools to ensure the reliability vs validity of different home modification programs. To understand the nature of MDT practice and derive a set of generalizable protocols for developing person-centered home assessment tools, we conducted a systematic analysis of the ten evidence-based home assessment tools and 41 peer-reviewed journal papers about how the tools were developed, used, and modified. In addition, we applied the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) to examine the use of MDTs in developing the tools and carrying out the programs. Based on our analysis, we propose a set of preliminary protocols for developing home assessment tools and a logic model for conducting person-centered home modification programs. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8681093/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2372 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Yan, Mengzhao
Wilber, Kathleen
Pynoos, Jon
Understanding Multidisciplinary-team Practice in Developing Home Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review
title Understanding Multidisciplinary-team Practice in Developing Home Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review
title_full Understanding Multidisciplinary-team Practice in Developing Home Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Understanding Multidisciplinary-team Practice in Developing Home Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Multidisciplinary-team Practice in Developing Home Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review
title_short Understanding Multidisciplinary-team Practice in Developing Home Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review
title_sort understanding multidisciplinary-team practice in developing home assessment tools: a systematic review
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8681093/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2372
work_keys_str_mv AT yanmengzhao understandingmultidisciplinaryteampracticeindevelopinghomeassessmenttoolsasystematicreview
AT wilberkathleen understandingmultidisciplinaryteampracticeindevelopinghomeassessmenttoolsasystematicreview
AT pynoosjon understandingmultidisciplinaryteampracticeindevelopinghomeassessmenttoolsasystematicreview