Cargando…

Technology Use, Comfort, and Interest: A comparison between caregiver and older adult populations

Remaining community-dwelling is a goal for most aging adults; however, this may necessitate assistance from caregivers. To reduce burden and improve adult autonomy, recent technological advancements have provided various supports. These advancements may improve quality of life (QOL) while also enhan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hubner, Sarah, Chataut, Akankshya, Shade, Marcia, Fruhling, Ann, Manley, Natalie, Walls, Meaghan Fitzgerald, Boron, Julie Blaskewicz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8681342/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2491
_version_ 1784616954290503680
author Hubner, Sarah
Chataut, Akankshya
Shade, Marcia
Fruhling, Ann
Manley, Natalie
Walls, Meaghan Fitzgerald
Boron, Julie Blaskewicz
author_facet Hubner, Sarah
Chataut, Akankshya
Shade, Marcia
Fruhling, Ann
Manley, Natalie
Walls, Meaghan Fitzgerald
Boron, Julie Blaskewicz
author_sort Hubner, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Remaining community-dwelling is a goal for most aging adults; however, this may necessitate assistance from caregivers. To reduce burden and improve adult autonomy, recent technological advancements have provided various supports. These advancements may improve quality of life (QOL) while also enhancing psychological/physical well-being for adults and caregivers. To investigate relationships between technology, QOL, and caregiver burden, needs assessments with focus groups were utilized. Four older adult focus groups (N=20) and three caregiver focus groups (N=12) were convened. Older adult participants, aged 64-83 years (M=73.1,SD=5.3), were 50% female and generally white (90%). Caregiver participants, aged 31-78 years (M=61.9,SD=12.6), were majority female (83%) and generally white (92%). Because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, focus groups were conducted via Zoom video-conferencing. Thematic analyses revealed major themes of privacy, transportation, and interest in streamlined technologies. Throughout groups, privacy was consistently described; participants were either 1) apathetic, noting absence of privacy or 2) hyper-vigilant about security, citing privacy as a major barrier to utilization. Transportation, specifically self-driving/enhanced vehicles, emerged as a focus for future technologies as a means to reduce care burden and improve personal autonomy/QOL. In general, participants noted that major barriers to technology use included complexity and cost; persons expressed interest in simpler/cheaper devices. This study indicates varied interest in technology while exposing barriers to use. Additionally, the methodology demonstrates the utility of technology (e.g., Zoom) in accessing vulnerable and/or isolated populations. Overall, understanding barriers to technology use and adoption informs upcoming developments and may improve accessibility and usefulness in future systems/devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8681342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86813422021-12-17 Technology Use, Comfort, and Interest: A comparison between caregiver and older adult populations Hubner, Sarah Chataut, Akankshya Shade, Marcia Fruhling, Ann Manley, Natalie Walls, Meaghan Fitzgerald Boron, Julie Blaskewicz Innov Aging Abstracts Remaining community-dwelling is a goal for most aging adults; however, this may necessitate assistance from caregivers. To reduce burden and improve adult autonomy, recent technological advancements have provided various supports. These advancements may improve quality of life (QOL) while also enhancing psychological/physical well-being for adults and caregivers. To investigate relationships between technology, QOL, and caregiver burden, needs assessments with focus groups were utilized. Four older adult focus groups (N=20) and three caregiver focus groups (N=12) were convened. Older adult participants, aged 64-83 years (M=73.1,SD=5.3), were 50% female and generally white (90%). Caregiver participants, aged 31-78 years (M=61.9,SD=12.6), were majority female (83%) and generally white (92%). Because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, focus groups were conducted via Zoom video-conferencing. Thematic analyses revealed major themes of privacy, transportation, and interest in streamlined technologies. Throughout groups, privacy was consistently described; participants were either 1) apathetic, noting absence of privacy or 2) hyper-vigilant about security, citing privacy as a major barrier to utilization. Transportation, specifically self-driving/enhanced vehicles, emerged as a focus for future technologies as a means to reduce care burden and improve personal autonomy/QOL. In general, participants noted that major barriers to technology use included complexity and cost; persons expressed interest in simpler/cheaper devices. This study indicates varied interest in technology while exposing barriers to use. Additionally, the methodology demonstrates the utility of technology (e.g., Zoom) in accessing vulnerable and/or isolated populations. Overall, understanding barriers to technology use and adoption informs upcoming developments and may improve accessibility and usefulness in future systems/devices. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8681342/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2491 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hubner, Sarah
Chataut, Akankshya
Shade, Marcia
Fruhling, Ann
Manley, Natalie
Walls, Meaghan Fitzgerald
Boron, Julie Blaskewicz
Technology Use, Comfort, and Interest: A comparison between caregiver and older adult populations
title Technology Use, Comfort, and Interest: A comparison between caregiver and older adult populations
title_full Technology Use, Comfort, and Interest: A comparison between caregiver and older adult populations
title_fullStr Technology Use, Comfort, and Interest: A comparison between caregiver and older adult populations
title_full_unstemmed Technology Use, Comfort, and Interest: A comparison between caregiver and older adult populations
title_short Technology Use, Comfort, and Interest: A comparison between caregiver and older adult populations
title_sort technology use, comfort, and interest: a comparison between caregiver and older adult populations
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8681342/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2491
work_keys_str_mv AT hubnersarah technologyusecomfortandinterestacomparisonbetweencaregiverandolderadultpopulations
AT chatautakankshya technologyusecomfortandinterestacomparisonbetweencaregiverandolderadultpopulations
AT shademarcia technologyusecomfortandinterestacomparisonbetweencaregiverandolderadultpopulations
AT fruhlingann technologyusecomfortandinterestacomparisonbetweencaregiverandolderadultpopulations
AT manleynatalie technologyusecomfortandinterestacomparisonbetweencaregiverandolderadultpopulations
AT wallsmeaghanfitzgerald technologyusecomfortandinterestacomparisonbetweencaregiverandolderadultpopulations
AT boronjulieblaskewicz technologyusecomfortandinterestacomparisonbetweencaregiverandolderadultpopulations