Cargando…

The Impact Of A Whole Health Model Of Care On Patient Outcomes

The FlourishCare Model (FCM) transforms primary care sites by addressing all determinants of health and focusing on helping patients to flourish. The FlourishCare Index (FCI) is a clinical measure to assess the effectiveness of the FCM to address all determinants of health. We will present data on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faul, Anna, Yankeelov, Pamela, D'Ambrosio, Joseph, Cotton, Sam, Gordon, Barbara, Hall-Faul, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8681509/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.3048
_version_ 1784616994456207360
author Faul, Anna
Yankeelov, Pamela
D'Ambrosio, Joseph
Cotton, Sam
Gordon, Barbara
Hall-Faul, Maria
author_facet Faul, Anna
Yankeelov, Pamela
D'Ambrosio, Joseph
Cotton, Sam
Gordon, Barbara
Hall-Faul, Maria
author_sort Faul, Anna
collection PubMed
description The FlourishCare Model (FCM) transforms primary care sites by addressing all determinants of health and focusing on helping patients to flourish. The FlourishCare Index (FCI) is a clinical measure to assess the effectiveness of the FCM to address all determinants of health. We will present data on the effectiveness of the FCM serving 159 older adults with MCCs. The sample was mostly female (77%), White (64%), retired (54%), married (30%) or widowed (20%) and living in urban areas (64%). The mean age was 69 (SD=15), with 13 years education (SD=3). Patients changed significantly over time on total FCI scores (57%-72%;□=3.80,SE=0.63). Results show significant growth over time for individual health behaviors (58%-67%;□=2.14,SE=0.84), health care access (71%-89%;□=4.43,SE=1.00) and social determinants (62%-85%;□=5.54,SE=1.02) with psychological determinants (54%-61%;□=1.74,SE=0.95) and environmental determinants (70%-81%;□=2.81,SE=1.62) showing a trend to significance. Interaction effects with time show that the FCM supported patients with lower education attainment to improve at a higher rate than those with higher education attainment, for the total FCI score (□=-0.59,SE=0.24) and health care access (□=-0.94,SE=0.38). Receiving mental health counseling resulted in more improvement in psychological determinants than those who did not receive counseling (□=3.43,SE=2.04). The FCM was able to support rural patients at a higher rate than urban patients to gain access to health care (□=4.13,SE=2.02). The FCM supported Hispanic patients the most in improving social determinants of health (□=8.40,SE=3.93). This study showed the importance of a systems approach to care using measures that focus on what matters most to older adults who value quality-of-life outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8681509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86815092021-12-17 The Impact Of A Whole Health Model Of Care On Patient Outcomes Faul, Anna Yankeelov, Pamela D'Ambrosio, Joseph Cotton, Sam Gordon, Barbara Hall-Faul, Maria Innov Aging Abstracts The FlourishCare Model (FCM) transforms primary care sites by addressing all determinants of health and focusing on helping patients to flourish. The FlourishCare Index (FCI) is a clinical measure to assess the effectiveness of the FCM to address all determinants of health. We will present data on the effectiveness of the FCM serving 159 older adults with MCCs. The sample was mostly female (77%), White (64%), retired (54%), married (30%) or widowed (20%) and living in urban areas (64%). The mean age was 69 (SD=15), with 13 years education (SD=3). Patients changed significantly over time on total FCI scores (57%-72%;□=3.80,SE=0.63). Results show significant growth over time for individual health behaviors (58%-67%;□=2.14,SE=0.84), health care access (71%-89%;□=4.43,SE=1.00) and social determinants (62%-85%;□=5.54,SE=1.02) with psychological determinants (54%-61%;□=1.74,SE=0.95) and environmental determinants (70%-81%;□=2.81,SE=1.62) showing a trend to significance. Interaction effects with time show that the FCM supported patients with lower education attainment to improve at a higher rate than those with higher education attainment, for the total FCI score (□=-0.59,SE=0.24) and health care access (□=-0.94,SE=0.38). Receiving mental health counseling resulted in more improvement in psychological determinants than those who did not receive counseling (□=3.43,SE=2.04). The FCM was able to support rural patients at a higher rate than urban patients to gain access to health care (□=4.13,SE=2.02). The FCM supported Hispanic patients the most in improving social determinants of health (□=8.40,SE=3.93). This study showed the importance of a systems approach to care using measures that focus on what matters most to older adults who value quality-of-life outcomes. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8681509/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.3048 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Faul, Anna
Yankeelov, Pamela
D'Ambrosio, Joseph
Cotton, Sam
Gordon, Barbara
Hall-Faul, Maria
The Impact Of A Whole Health Model Of Care On Patient Outcomes
title The Impact Of A Whole Health Model Of Care On Patient Outcomes
title_full The Impact Of A Whole Health Model Of Care On Patient Outcomes
title_fullStr The Impact Of A Whole Health Model Of Care On Patient Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed The Impact Of A Whole Health Model Of Care On Patient Outcomes
title_short The Impact Of A Whole Health Model Of Care On Patient Outcomes
title_sort impact of a whole health model of care on patient outcomes
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8681509/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.3048
work_keys_str_mv AT faulanna theimpactofawholehealthmodelofcareonpatientoutcomes
AT yankeelovpamela theimpactofawholehealthmodelofcareonpatientoutcomes
AT dambrosiojoseph theimpactofawholehealthmodelofcareonpatientoutcomes
AT cottonsam theimpactofawholehealthmodelofcareonpatientoutcomes
AT gordonbarbara theimpactofawholehealthmodelofcareonpatientoutcomes
AT hallfaulmaria theimpactofawholehealthmodelofcareonpatientoutcomes
AT faulanna impactofawholehealthmodelofcareonpatientoutcomes
AT yankeelovpamela impactofawholehealthmodelofcareonpatientoutcomes
AT dambrosiojoseph impactofawholehealthmodelofcareonpatientoutcomes
AT cottonsam impactofawholehealthmodelofcareonpatientoutcomes
AT gordonbarbara impactofawholehealthmodelofcareonpatientoutcomes
AT hallfaulmaria impactofawholehealthmodelofcareonpatientoutcomes