Cargando…

Self-efficacy in Thought Control , not Positive Gains, Mediates Effect of Benefit-Finding Intervention for Carers

This study examines the therapeutic mechanism of the benefit-finding therapeutic (BFT) intervention that used cognitive reappraisal and alternative thinking to construct positive aspects of caregiving (PAC), in a cluster-randomized controlled trial for Alzheimer caregivers. 42 caregivers received BF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cheng, Sheung-Tak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8681634/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2970
_version_ 1784617024206405632
author Cheng, Sheung-Tak
author_facet Cheng, Sheung-Tak
author_sort Cheng, Sheung-Tak
collection PubMed
description This study examines the therapeutic mechanism of the benefit-finding therapeutic (BFT) intervention that used cognitive reappraisal and alternative thinking to construct positive aspects of caregiving (PAC), in a cluster-randomized controlled trial for Alzheimer caregivers. 42 caregivers received BFT whereas 87 received psychoeducation as control. Both interventions were held in groups. Depressive symptoms and global burden were outcomes measured at baseline, postintervention, and 4- and 10-month follow-up. Mediators considered included PAC and three self-efficacies—controlling upsetting thoughts (SE-CUT), responding to disruptive behaviors, and obtaining respite. Using mixed-effects regression, we demonstrated that benefit-finding increased caregivers’ PAC and SE-CUT, but that only SE-CUT uniquely predicted depressive symptoms and global burden longitudinally. Path analyses with bootstrapped confidence intervals showed that SE-CUT change from baseline to postintervention mediated intervention effects on depressive symptoms, but not global burden, at both follow-ups. No mediation effects were found for PAC and the other self-efficacies. As a conclusion, The BFT effect on depressive symptoms was partly accounted for by improvement in SE-CUT. The therapeutic mechanism for the effect on burden remained unknown. The study sheds light on the importance of actively promoting positive caregiver functioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8681634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86816342021-12-17 Self-efficacy in Thought Control , not Positive Gains, Mediates Effect of Benefit-Finding Intervention for Carers Cheng, Sheung-Tak Innov Aging Abstracts This study examines the therapeutic mechanism of the benefit-finding therapeutic (BFT) intervention that used cognitive reappraisal and alternative thinking to construct positive aspects of caregiving (PAC), in a cluster-randomized controlled trial for Alzheimer caregivers. 42 caregivers received BFT whereas 87 received psychoeducation as control. Both interventions were held in groups. Depressive symptoms and global burden were outcomes measured at baseline, postintervention, and 4- and 10-month follow-up. Mediators considered included PAC and three self-efficacies—controlling upsetting thoughts (SE-CUT), responding to disruptive behaviors, and obtaining respite. Using mixed-effects regression, we demonstrated that benefit-finding increased caregivers’ PAC and SE-CUT, but that only SE-CUT uniquely predicted depressive symptoms and global burden longitudinally. Path analyses with bootstrapped confidence intervals showed that SE-CUT change from baseline to postintervention mediated intervention effects on depressive symptoms, but not global burden, at both follow-ups. No mediation effects were found for PAC and the other self-efficacies. As a conclusion, The BFT effect on depressive symptoms was partly accounted for by improvement in SE-CUT. The therapeutic mechanism for the effect on burden remained unknown. The study sheds light on the importance of actively promoting positive caregiver functioning. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8681634/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2970 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Cheng, Sheung-Tak
Self-efficacy in Thought Control , not Positive Gains, Mediates Effect of Benefit-Finding Intervention for Carers
title Self-efficacy in Thought Control , not Positive Gains, Mediates Effect of Benefit-Finding Intervention for Carers
title_full Self-efficacy in Thought Control , not Positive Gains, Mediates Effect of Benefit-Finding Intervention for Carers
title_fullStr Self-efficacy in Thought Control , not Positive Gains, Mediates Effect of Benefit-Finding Intervention for Carers
title_full_unstemmed Self-efficacy in Thought Control , not Positive Gains, Mediates Effect of Benefit-Finding Intervention for Carers
title_short Self-efficacy in Thought Control , not Positive Gains, Mediates Effect of Benefit-Finding Intervention for Carers
title_sort self-efficacy in thought control , not positive gains, mediates effect of benefit-finding intervention for carers
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8681634/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2970
work_keys_str_mv AT chengsheungtak selfefficacyinthoughtcontrolnotpositivegainsmediateseffectofbenefitfindinginterventionforcarers