Cargando…

Identifying Neurobiological Underpinnings of Two Suicidal Subtypes

Despite substantial suicide prevention efforts, US suicide rates continue to climb, currently reaching about 14 per 100,000 individuals. Suicidal behavior has been linked to neurobiological, neurocognitive and behavioral factors; however, integrative, multi-modal studies are rare. Furthermore, prosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stanley, Barbara, Itzhaky, Liat, Oquendo, Maria A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8681698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926832
http://dx.doi.org/10.20900/jpbs.20210016
_version_ 1784617039506178048
author Stanley, Barbara
Itzhaky, Liat
Oquendo, Maria A.
author_facet Stanley, Barbara
Itzhaky, Liat
Oquendo, Maria A.
author_sort Stanley, Barbara
collection PubMed
description Despite substantial suicide prevention efforts, US suicide rates continue to climb, currently reaching about 14 per 100,000 individuals. Suicidal behavior has been linked to neurobiological, neurocognitive and behavioral factors; however, integrative, multi-modal studies are rare. Furthermore, prospective studies, crucial to understanding future risk factors, have focused on a single predictor and a single outcome, implying that suicidal behavior is homogeneous. But recent research shows suicidal behavior is complex and heterogeneous, with the possible existence of subtypes. The present report describes a project testing a model that posits two putative subtypes, using a prospective, multi-model design. The subtypes differ in regard to the patterns of suicidal ideation and underlying mechanisms. One hundred subjects diagnosed with a Major Depressive episode, half of whom have attempted suicide in the past, are enrolled and followed for two years, notably the highest risk period for suicidal behavior. Baseline assessments include a clinical assessment, neurocognitive and behavioral tasks, Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA), PET imaging, and a cognitive emotion regulation task in the MRI scanner. The follow-up assessment includes a clinical assessment and EMA. The study findings have the potential to pave the way for a clearer understanding of suicidal ideation and behaviors and to improve our ability to treat those at risk for suicide by developing tailored approaches that will allow for more accurate pharmacological and psychosocial interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8681698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86816982021-12-17 Identifying Neurobiological Underpinnings of Two Suicidal Subtypes Stanley, Barbara Itzhaky, Liat Oquendo, Maria A. J Psychiatr Brain Sci Article Despite substantial suicide prevention efforts, US suicide rates continue to climb, currently reaching about 14 per 100,000 individuals. Suicidal behavior has been linked to neurobiological, neurocognitive and behavioral factors; however, integrative, multi-modal studies are rare. Furthermore, prospective studies, crucial to understanding future risk factors, have focused on a single predictor and a single outcome, implying that suicidal behavior is homogeneous. But recent research shows suicidal behavior is complex and heterogeneous, with the possible existence of subtypes. The present report describes a project testing a model that posits two putative subtypes, using a prospective, multi-model design. The subtypes differ in regard to the patterns of suicidal ideation and underlying mechanisms. One hundred subjects diagnosed with a Major Depressive episode, half of whom have attempted suicide in the past, are enrolled and followed for two years, notably the highest risk period for suicidal behavior. Baseline assessments include a clinical assessment, neurocognitive and behavioral tasks, Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA), PET imaging, and a cognitive emotion regulation task in the MRI scanner. The follow-up assessment includes a clinical assessment and EMA. The study findings have the potential to pave the way for a clearer understanding of suicidal ideation and behaviors and to improve our ability to treat those at risk for suicide by developing tailored approaches that will allow for more accurate pharmacological and psychosocial interventions. 2021-08-31 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8681698/ /pubmed/34926832 http://dx.doi.org/10.20900/jpbs.20210016 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Stanley, Barbara
Itzhaky, Liat
Oquendo, Maria A.
Identifying Neurobiological Underpinnings of Two Suicidal Subtypes
title Identifying Neurobiological Underpinnings of Two Suicidal Subtypes
title_full Identifying Neurobiological Underpinnings of Two Suicidal Subtypes
title_fullStr Identifying Neurobiological Underpinnings of Two Suicidal Subtypes
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Neurobiological Underpinnings of Two Suicidal Subtypes
title_short Identifying Neurobiological Underpinnings of Two Suicidal Subtypes
title_sort identifying neurobiological underpinnings of two suicidal subtypes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8681698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926832
http://dx.doi.org/10.20900/jpbs.20210016
work_keys_str_mv AT stanleybarbara identifyingneurobiologicalunderpinningsoftwosuicidalsubtypes
AT itzhakyliat identifyingneurobiologicalunderpinningsoftwosuicidalsubtypes
AT oquendomariaa identifyingneurobiologicalunderpinningsoftwosuicidalsubtypes