Cargando…

Predictors of positive or negative reactions to learning Alzheimer’s biomarker results

With improved detection of Alzheimer’s disease and biomarker accessibility, more adults with no or mild symptoms may learn their AD biomarker results. Yet, potential psychosocial impact of learning AD biomarkers is not well understood. In a phone survey, we assessed potential reactions after learnin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erickson, Claire, Chin, Nate, Jonaitis, Erin, Ketchum, Fred, Gleason, Carey, Clark, Lindsay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8682254/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.3426
_version_ 1784617171779846144
author Erickson, Claire
Chin, Nate
Jonaitis, Erin
Ketchum, Fred
Gleason, Carey
Clark, Lindsay
author_facet Erickson, Claire
Chin, Nate
Jonaitis, Erin
Ketchum, Fred
Gleason, Carey
Clark, Lindsay
author_sort Erickson, Claire
collection PubMed
description With improved detection of Alzheimer’s disease and biomarker accessibility, more adults with no or mild symptoms may learn their AD biomarker results. Yet, potential psychosocial impact of learning AD biomarkers is not well understood. In a phone survey, we assessed potential reactions after learning about a hypothetical positive AD biomarker result. Data were collected from cognitively healthy participants (n=334, mean age=64.8±7.7) enrolled in longitudinal AD studies. Exploratory factor analysis identified five latent factors following a hypothetical positive biomarker result: advanced care planning, lifestyle changes to reduce dementia risk factors, psychological distress, subjective cognitive complaints, and stigma. Using linear regression, we found that predictors of potential pessimistic reactions (distress, cognitive complaints, stigma) included higher trust in research (Distress:b:0.04, p:0.04), no dementia family history (Stigma:b:-0.30,p:0.04), poorer memory self-rating (Cognitive complaints:b:-0.19,p:0.02), and Black racial identity (Cognitive complaints:b:0.30,p:0.02, Stigma:b:0.40,p:0.003). Predictors of potential optimistic reactions (advanced care planning, lifestyle changes) included more trust in research (Planning:b:0.07,p<0.0001) and Black racial identity (Planning:b:0.38,p:0.003), as well as younger age (Lifestyle:b:-0.02,p:0.02) and belief in AD controllability (Planning:b:0.22,p:0.003, Lifestyle:b:0.23,p:0.002). Concern about developing AD was associated with increased likelihood of all potential reactions. While AD concern associates with optimistic and pessimistic potential reactions, specific factors of family history, racial identity, trust, belief in AD controllability, and memory rating differentially predict each of the potential outcomes of learning AD biomarker results. These findings may help target education efforts to prepare and reduce risk of negative reactions for cognitively healthy adults who learn their AD biomarker results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8682254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86822542021-12-20 Predictors of positive or negative reactions to learning Alzheimer’s biomarker results Erickson, Claire Chin, Nate Jonaitis, Erin Ketchum, Fred Gleason, Carey Clark, Lindsay Innov Aging Abstracts With improved detection of Alzheimer’s disease and biomarker accessibility, more adults with no or mild symptoms may learn their AD biomarker results. Yet, potential psychosocial impact of learning AD biomarkers is not well understood. In a phone survey, we assessed potential reactions after learning about a hypothetical positive AD biomarker result. Data were collected from cognitively healthy participants (n=334, mean age=64.8±7.7) enrolled in longitudinal AD studies. Exploratory factor analysis identified five latent factors following a hypothetical positive biomarker result: advanced care planning, lifestyle changes to reduce dementia risk factors, psychological distress, subjective cognitive complaints, and stigma. Using linear regression, we found that predictors of potential pessimistic reactions (distress, cognitive complaints, stigma) included higher trust in research (Distress:b:0.04, p:0.04), no dementia family history (Stigma:b:-0.30,p:0.04), poorer memory self-rating (Cognitive complaints:b:-0.19,p:0.02), and Black racial identity (Cognitive complaints:b:0.30,p:0.02, Stigma:b:0.40,p:0.003). Predictors of potential optimistic reactions (advanced care planning, lifestyle changes) included more trust in research (Planning:b:0.07,p<0.0001) and Black racial identity (Planning:b:0.38,p:0.003), as well as younger age (Lifestyle:b:-0.02,p:0.02) and belief in AD controllability (Planning:b:0.22,p:0.003, Lifestyle:b:0.23,p:0.002). Concern about developing AD was associated with increased likelihood of all potential reactions. While AD concern associates with optimistic and pessimistic potential reactions, specific factors of family history, racial identity, trust, belief in AD controllability, and memory rating differentially predict each of the potential outcomes of learning AD biomarker results. These findings may help target education efforts to prepare and reduce risk of negative reactions for cognitively healthy adults who learn their AD biomarker results. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8682254/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.3426 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Erickson, Claire
Chin, Nate
Jonaitis, Erin
Ketchum, Fred
Gleason, Carey
Clark, Lindsay
Predictors of positive or negative reactions to learning Alzheimer’s biomarker results
title Predictors of positive or negative reactions to learning Alzheimer’s biomarker results
title_full Predictors of positive or negative reactions to learning Alzheimer’s biomarker results
title_fullStr Predictors of positive or negative reactions to learning Alzheimer’s biomarker results
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of positive or negative reactions to learning Alzheimer’s biomarker results
title_short Predictors of positive or negative reactions to learning Alzheimer’s biomarker results
title_sort predictors of positive or negative reactions to learning alzheimer’s biomarker results
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8682254/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.3426
work_keys_str_mv AT ericksonclaire predictorsofpositiveornegativereactionstolearningalzheimersbiomarkerresults
AT chinnate predictorsofpositiveornegativereactionstolearningalzheimersbiomarkerresults
AT jonaitiserin predictorsofpositiveornegativereactionstolearningalzheimersbiomarkerresults
AT ketchumfred predictorsofpositiveornegativereactionstolearningalzheimersbiomarkerresults
AT gleasoncarey predictorsofpositiveornegativereactionstolearningalzheimersbiomarkerresults
AT clarklindsay predictorsofpositiveornegativereactionstolearningalzheimersbiomarkerresults