Cargando…
Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status
Using Medicare data 2015-2017, we conducted 5 sequential 1-to-1 propensity score-matched analyses of ARNI initiators and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) initiators, mimicking the accrual of new data every 6 months. Primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of heart failure hospitalization o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8682281/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.802 |
Sumario: | Using Medicare data 2015-2017, we conducted 5 sequential 1-to-1 propensity score-matched analyses of ARNI initiators and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) initiators, mimicking the accrual of new data every 6 months. Primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality and primary safety endpoint was a composite of hospitalization or emergency department visits for hypotension, acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and angioedema. Among non-frail patients (n=5,014), the rates (per 100 person-years) for ARNI vs ARB were 12.7 and 9.2 (rate difference: 3.4, 95% CI: 0.8 to 6.1), respectively, for the effectiveness endpoint and 5.2 and 3.6 (rate difference: 1.5, 95% CI: -0.1 to 3.2), respectively, for the safety endpoint. Among frail patients (n=2,694), the corresponding rates were 19.8 and 21.6 (rate difference: -1.8, 95% CI: -7.0 to 3.4) for the effectiveness endpoint and 10.9 and 8.0 (rate difference: 2.9, 95% CI: -0.6 to 6.4) for the safety endpoint. |
---|