Cargando…
Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status
Using Medicare data 2015-2017, we conducted 5 sequential 1-to-1 propensity score-matched analyses of ARNI initiators and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) initiators, mimicking the accrual of new data every 6 months. Primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of heart failure hospitalization o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8682281/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.802 |
_version_ | 1784617177908772864 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Dae Patorno, Elisabetta Gopalakrishnan, Chandrasekar |
author_facet | Kim, Dae Patorno, Elisabetta Gopalakrishnan, Chandrasekar |
author_sort | Kim, Dae |
collection | PubMed |
description | Using Medicare data 2015-2017, we conducted 5 sequential 1-to-1 propensity score-matched analyses of ARNI initiators and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) initiators, mimicking the accrual of new data every 6 months. Primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality and primary safety endpoint was a composite of hospitalization or emergency department visits for hypotension, acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and angioedema. Among non-frail patients (n=5,014), the rates (per 100 person-years) for ARNI vs ARB were 12.7 and 9.2 (rate difference: 3.4, 95% CI: 0.8 to 6.1), respectively, for the effectiveness endpoint and 5.2 and 3.6 (rate difference: 1.5, 95% CI: -0.1 to 3.2), respectively, for the safety endpoint. Among frail patients (n=2,694), the corresponding rates were 19.8 and 21.6 (rate difference: -1.8, 95% CI: -7.0 to 3.4) for the effectiveness endpoint and 10.9 and 8.0 (rate difference: 2.9, 95% CI: -0.6 to 6.4) for the safety endpoint. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8682281 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86822812021-12-17 Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status Kim, Dae Patorno, Elisabetta Gopalakrishnan, Chandrasekar Innov Aging Abstracts Using Medicare data 2015-2017, we conducted 5 sequential 1-to-1 propensity score-matched analyses of ARNI initiators and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) initiators, mimicking the accrual of new data every 6 months. Primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality and primary safety endpoint was a composite of hospitalization or emergency department visits for hypotension, acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and angioedema. Among non-frail patients (n=5,014), the rates (per 100 person-years) for ARNI vs ARB were 12.7 and 9.2 (rate difference: 3.4, 95% CI: 0.8 to 6.1), respectively, for the effectiveness endpoint and 5.2 and 3.6 (rate difference: 1.5, 95% CI: -0.1 to 3.2), respectively, for the safety endpoint. Among frail patients (n=2,694), the corresponding rates were 19.8 and 21.6 (rate difference: -1.8, 95% CI: -7.0 to 3.4) for the effectiveness endpoint and 10.9 and 8.0 (rate difference: 2.9, 95% CI: -0.6 to 6.4) for the safety endpoint. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8682281/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.802 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Kim, Dae Patorno, Elisabetta Gopalakrishnan, Chandrasekar Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status |
title | Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status |
title_full | Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status |
title_fullStr | Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status |
title_short | Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status |
title_sort | monitoring the effectiveness and safety of arni vs. angiotensin receptor blocker by frailty status |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8682281/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.802 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimdae monitoringtheeffectivenessandsafetyofarnivsangiotensinreceptorblockerbyfrailtystatus AT patornoelisabetta monitoringtheeffectivenessandsafetyofarnivsangiotensinreceptorblockerbyfrailtystatus AT gopalakrishnanchandrasekar monitoringtheeffectivenessandsafetyofarnivsangiotensinreceptorblockerbyfrailtystatus |