Cargando…

Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status

Using Medicare data 2015-2017, we conducted 5 sequential 1-to-1 propensity score-matched analyses of ARNI initiators and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) initiators, mimicking the accrual of new data every 6 months. Primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of heart failure hospitalization o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Dae, Patorno, Elisabetta, Gopalakrishnan, Chandrasekar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8682281/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.802
_version_ 1784617177908772864
author Kim, Dae
Patorno, Elisabetta
Gopalakrishnan, Chandrasekar
author_facet Kim, Dae
Patorno, Elisabetta
Gopalakrishnan, Chandrasekar
author_sort Kim, Dae
collection PubMed
description Using Medicare data 2015-2017, we conducted 5 sequential 1-to-1 propensity score-matched analyses of ARNI initiators and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) initiators, mimicking the accrual of new data every 6 months. Primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality and primary safety endpoint was a composite of hospitalization or emergency department visits for hypotension, acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and angioedema. Among non-frail patients (n=5,014), the rates (per 100 person-years) for ARNI vs ARB were 12.7 and 9.2 (rate difference: 3.4, 95% CI: 0.8 to 6.1), respectively, for the effectiveness endpoint and 5.2 and 3.6 (rate difference: 1.5, 95% CI: -0.1 to 3.2), respectively, for the safety endpoint. Among frail patients (n=2,694), the corresponding rates were 19.8 and 21.6 (rate difference: -1.8, 95% CI: -7.0 to 3.4) for the effectiveness endpoint and 10.9 and 8.0 (rate difference: 2.9, 95% CI: -0.6 to 6.4) for the safety endpoint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8682281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86822812021-12-17 Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status Kim, Dae Patorno, Elisabetta Gopalakrishnan, Chandrasekar Innov Aging Abstracts Using Medicare data 2015-2017, we conducted 5 sequential 1-to-1 propensity score-matched analyses of ARNI initiators and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) initiators, mimicking the accrual of new data every 6 months. Primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality and primary safety endpoint was a composite of hospitalization or emergency department visits for hypotension, acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and angioedema. Among non-frail patients (n=5,014), the rates (per 100 person-years) for ARNI vs ARB were 12.7 and 9.2 (rate difference: 3.4, 95% CI: 0.8 to 6.1), respectively, for the effectiveness endpoint and 5.2 and 3.6 (rate difference: 1.5, 95% CI: -0.1 to 3.2), respectively, for the safety endpoint. Among frail patients (n=2,694), the corresponding rates were 19.8 and 21.6 (rate difference: -1.8, 95% CI: -7.0 to 3.4) for the effectiveness endpoint and 10.9 and 8.0 (rate difference: 2.9, 95% CI: -0.6 to 6.4) for the safety endpoint. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8682281/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.802 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Kim, Dae
Patorno, Elisabetta
Gopalakrishnan, Chandrasekar
Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status
title Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status
title_full Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status
title_fullStr Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status
title_short Monitoring the Effectiveness and Safety of ARNI vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker by Frailty Status
title_sort monitoring the effectiveness and safety of arni vs. angiotensin receptor blocker by frailty status
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8682281/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.802
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdae monitoringtheeffectivenessandsafetyofarnivsangiotensinreceptorblockerbyfrailtystatus
AT patornoelisabetta monitoringtheeffectivenessandsafetyofarnivsangiotensinreceptorblockerbyfrailtystatus
AT gopalakrishnanchandrasekar monitoringtheeffectivenessandsafetyofarnivsangiotensinreceptorblockerbyfrailtystatus