Cargando…
COVID-19 incidence in border regions: spatiotemporal patterns and border control measures
OBJECTIVES: Among the few studies examining patterns of COVID-19 spread in border regions, findings are highly varied and partially contradictory. This study presents empirical results on the spatial and temporal dynamics of incidence in 10 European border regions. We identify geographical differenc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal Society for Public Health.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8683116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34923347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.11.006 |
_version_ | 1784617344050397184 |
---|---|
author | Chilla, Tobias Große, Tim Hippe, Stefan Walker, Blake Byron |
author_facet | Chilla, Tobias Große, Tim Hippe, Stefan Walker, Blake Byron |
author_sort | Chilla, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Among the few studies examining patterns of COVID-19 spread in border regions, findings are highly varied and partially contradictory. This study presents empirical results on the spatial and temporal dynamics of incidence in 10 European border regions. We identify geographical differences in incidence between border regions and inland regions, and we provide a heuristic to characterise spillover effects. STUDY DESIGN: Observational spatiotemporal analysis. METHODS: Using 14-day incidence rates (04/2020 to 25/2021) for border regions around Germany, we delineate three pandemic ‘waves’ by the dates with the lowest recorded rates between peak incidence. We mapped COVID-19 incidence data at the finest spatial scale available and compared border regions’ incidence rates and trends to their nationwide values. The observed spatial and temporal patterns are then compared to the time and duration of border controls in the study area. RESULTS: We observed both symmetry and asymmetry of incidence rates within border pairs, varying by country. Several asymmetrical border pairs feature temporal convergence, which is a plausible indicator for spillover dynamics. We thus derived a border incidence typology to characterise (1) symmetric border pairs, (2) asymmetric border pairs without spillover effects, and (3) asymmetric with spillover effects. In all groups, border control measures were enacted but appear to have been effective only in certain cases. CONCLUSIONS: The heuristic of border pairs provides a useful typology for highlighting combinations of spillover effects and border controls. We conclude that border control measures may only be effective if the timing and the combination with other non-pharmaceutical measures is appropriate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8683116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal Society for Public Health. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86831162021-12-20 COVID-19 incidence in border regions: spatiotemporal patterns and border control measures Chilla, Tobias Große, Tim Hippe, Stefan Walker, Blake Byron Public Health Short Communication OBJECTIVES: Among the few studies examining patterns of COVID-19 spread in border regions, findings are highly varied and partially contradictory. This study presents empirical results on the spatial and temporal dynamics of incidence in 10 European border regions. We identify geographical differences in incidence between border regions and inland regions, and we provide a heuristic to characterise spillover effects. STUDY DESIGN: Observational spatiotemporal analysis. METHODS: Using 14-day incidence rates (04/2020 to 25/2021) for border regions around Germany, we delineate three pandemic ‘waves’ by the dates with the lowest recorded rates between peak incidence. We mapped COVID-19 incidence data at the finest spatial scale available and compared border regions’ incidence rates and trends to their nationwide values. The observed spatial and temporal patterns are then compared to the time and duration of border controls in the study area. RESULTS: We observed both symmetry and asymmetry of incidence rates within border pairs, varying by country. Several asymmetrical border pairs feature temporal convergence, which is a plausible indicator for spillover dynamics. We thus derived a border incidence typology to characterise (1) symmetric border pairs, (2) asymmetric border pairs without spillover effects, and (3) asymmetric with spillover effects. In all groups, border control measures were enacted but appear to have been effective only in certain cases. CONCLUSIONS: The heuristic of border pairs provides a useful typology for highlighting combinations of spillover effects and border controls. We conclude that border control measures may only be effective if the timing and the combination with other non-pharmaceutical measures is appropriate. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal Society for Public Health. 2022-01 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8683116/ /pubmed/34923347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.11.006 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Chilla, Tobias Große, Tim Hippe, Stefan Walker, Blake Byron COVID-19 incidence in border regions: spatiotemporal patterns and border control measures |
title | COVID-19 incidence in border regions: spatiotemporal patterns and border control measures |
title_full | COVID-19 incidence in border regions: spatiotemporal patterns and border control measures |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 incidence in border regions: spatiotemporal patterns and border control measures |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 incidence in border regions: spatiotemporal patterns and border control measures |
title_short | COVID-19 incidence in border regions: spatiotemporal patterns and border control measures |
title_sort | covid-19 incidence in border regions: spatiotemporal patterns and border control measures |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8683116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34923347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.11.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chillatobias covid19incidenceinborderregionsspatiotemporalpatternsandbordercontrolmeasures AT großetim covid19incidenceinborderregionsspatiotemporalpatternsandbordercontrolmeasures AT hippestefan covid19incidenceinborderregionsspatiotemporalpatternsandbordercontrolmeasures AT walkerblakebyron covid19incidenceinborderregionsspatiotemporalpatternsandbordercontrolmeasures |