Cargando…

Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab Versus Placebo Plus Rituximab for Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III iNNOVATE Study

PURPOSE: The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III iNNOVATE study showed sustained efficacy of ibrutinib-rituximab in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). Here, we present the final analysis from iNNOVATE. METHODS: Patients had confirmed symptomatic WM, either previously untre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buske, Christian, Tedeschi, Alessandra, Trotman, Judith, García-Sanz, Ramón, MacDonald, David, Leblond, Veronique, Mahe, Beatrice, Herbaux, Charles, Matous, Jeffrey V., Tam, Constantine S., Heffner, Leonard T., Varettoni, Marzia, Palomba, M. Lia, Shustik, Chaim, Kastritis, Efstathios, Treon, Steven P., Ping, Jerry, Hauns, Bernhard, Arango-Hisijara, Israel, Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8683240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34606378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.00838
_version_ 1784617371697152000
author Buske, Christian
Tedeschi, Alessandra
Trotman, Judith
García-Sanz, Ramón
MacDonald, David
Leblond, Veronique
Mahe, Beatrice
Herbaux, Charles
Matous, Jeffrey V.
Tam, Constantine S.
Heffner, Leonard T.
Varettoni, Marzia
Palomba, M. Lia
Shustik, Chaim
Kastritis, Efstathios
Treon, Steven P.
Ping, Jerry
Hauns, Bernhard
Arango-Hisijara, Israel
Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
author_facet Buske, Christian
Tedeschi, Alessandra
Trotman, Judith
García-Sanz, Ramón
MacDonald, David
Leblond, Veronique
Mahe, Beatrice
Herbaux, Charles
Matous, Jeffrey V.
Tam, Constantine S.
Heffner, Leonard T.
Varettoni, Marzia
Palomba, M. Lia
Shustik, Chaim
Kastritis, Efstathios
Treon, Steven P.
Ping, Jerry
Hauns, Bernhard
Arango-Hisijara, Israel
Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
author_sort Buske, Christian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III iNNOVATE study showed sustained efficacy of ibrutinib-rituximab in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). Here, we present the final analysis from iNNOVATE. METHODS: Patients had confirmed symptomatic WM, either previously untreated or previously treated; patients with prior rituximab had at least a minor response to their last rituximab-based regimen. Patients were randomly assigned to once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg plus rituximab or placebo plus rituximab (n = 75 per arm). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included response rate, time to next treatment, hemoglobin improvement, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 50 (range, 0.5-63) months, median (95% CI) PFS was not reached (57.7 months to not evaluable) with ibrutinib-rituximab versus 20.3 months (13.0 to 27.6) with placebo-rituximab (hazard ratio, 0.250; P < .0001). PFS benefit was regardless of prior treatment status, MYD88 and CXCR4 mutation status, or key patient characteristics. Higher response rates (partial response or better) were observed with ibrutinib-rituximab (76% v 31% with placebo-rituximab; P < .0001) and were sustained over time. Median time to next treatment was not reached with ibrutinib-rituximab versus 18 months with placebo-rituximab. More patients receiving ibrutinib-rituximab versus placebo-rituximab had sustained hemoglobin improvement (77% v 43%; P < .0001). Median overall survival was not reached in either arm. Ibrutinib-rituximab maintained a manageable safety profile; the prevalence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events of clinical interest generally decreased over time. CONCLUSION: In the final analysis of iNNOVATE with a median follow-up of 50 months, ibrutinib-rituximab showed ongoing superiority across clinical outcomes in patients with WM regardless of MYD88 or CXCR4 mutation status, prior treatment, and key patient characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8683240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86832402023-01-01 Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab Versus Placebo Plus Rituximab for Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III iNNOVATE Study Buske, Christian Tedeschi, Alessandra Trotman, Judith García-Sanz, Ramón MacDonald, David Leblond, Veronique Mahe, Beatrice Herbaux, Charles Matous, Jeffrey V. Tam, Constantine S. Heffner, Leonard T. Varettoni, Marzia Palomba, M. Lia Shustik, Chaim Kastritis, Efstathios Treon, Steven P. Ping, Jerry Hauns, Bernhard Arango-Hisijara, Israel Dimopoulos, Meletios A. J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III iNNOVATE study showed sustained efficacy of ibrutinib-rituximab in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). Here, we present the final analysis from iNNOVATE. METHODS: Patients had confirmed symptomatic WM, either previously untreated or previously treated; patients with prior rituximab had at least a minor response to their last rituximab-based regimen. Patients were randomly assigned to once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg plus rituximab or placebo plus rituximab (n = 75 per arm). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included response rate, time to next treatment, hemoglobin improvement, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 50 (range, 0.5-63) months, median (95% CI) PFS was not reached (57.7 months to not evaluable) with ibrutinib-rituximab versus 20.3 months (13.0 to 27.6) with placebo-rituximab (hazard ratio, 0.250; P < .0001). PFS benefit was regardless of prior treatment status, MYD88 and CXCR4 mutation status, or key patient characteristics. Higher response rates (partial response or better) were observed with ibrutinib-rituximab (76% v 31% with placebo-rituximab; P < .0001) and were sustained over time. Median time to next treatment was not reached with ibrutinib-rituximab versus 18 months with placebo-rituximab. More patients receiving ibrutinib-rituximab versus placebo-rituximab had sustained hemoglobin improvement (77% v 43%; P < .0001). Median overall survival was not reached in either arm. Ibrutinib-rituximab maintained a manageable safety profile; the prevalence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events of clinical interest generally decreased over time. CONCLUSION: In the final analysis of iNNOVATE with a median follow-up of 50 months, ibrutinib-rituximab showed ongoing superiority across clinical outcomes in patients with WM regardless of MYD88 or CXCR4 mutation status, prior treatment, and key patient characteristics. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-01-01 2021-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8683240/ /pubmed/34606378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.00838 Text en © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Buske, Christian
Tedeschi, Alessandra
Trotman, Judith
García-Sanz, Ramón
MacDonald, David
Leblond, Veronique
Mahe, Beatrice
Herbaux, Charles
Matous, Jeffrey V.
Tam, Constantine S.
Heffner, Leonard T.
Varettoni, Marzia
Palomba, M. Lia
Shustik, Chaim
Kastritis, Efstathios
Treon, Steven P.
Ping, Jerry
Hauns, Bernhard
Arango-Hisijara, Israel
Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab Versus Placebo Plus Rituximab for Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III iNNOVATE Study
title Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab Versus Placebo Plus Rituximab for Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III iNNOVATE Study
title_full Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab Versus Placebo Plus Rituximab for Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III iNNOVATE Study
title_fullStr Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab Versus Placebo Plus Rituximab for Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III iNNOVATE Study
title_full_unstemmed Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab Versus Placebo Plus Rituximab for Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III iNNOVATE Study
title_short Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab Versus Placebo Plus Rituximab for Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III iNNOVATE Study
title_sort ibrutinib plus rituximab versus placebo plus rituximab for waldenström's macroglobulinemia: final analysis from the randomized phase iii innovate study
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8683240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34606378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.00838
work_keys_str_mv AT buskechristian ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT tedeschialessandra ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT trotmanjudith ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT garciasanzramon ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT macdonalddavid ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT leblondveronique ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT mahebeatrice ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT herbauxcharles ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT matousjeffreyv ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT tamconstantines ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT heffnerleonardt ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT varettonimarzia ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT palombamlia ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT shustikchaim ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT kastritisefstathios ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT treonstevenp ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT pingjerry ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT haunsbernhard ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT arangohisijaraisrael ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy
AT dimopoulosmeletiosa ibrutinibplusrituximabversusplaceboplusrituximabforwaldenstromsmacroglobulinemiafinalanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiiinnovatestudy