Cargando…

Differences in femur geometry and bone markers in atypical femur fractures and the general population

This study aimed to identify differences in femur geometry between patients with subtrochanteric/shaft atypical femur fractures (AFFs) and the general population, and to evaluate the biomechanical factors related to femoral bowing in AFFs. We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients. Data on age, and hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Ik Jae, Kim, Ji Wan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8683396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34921200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03603-2
_version_ 1784617408932085760
author Jung, Ik Jae
Kim, Ji Wan
author_facet Jung, Ik Jae
Kim, Ji Wan
author_sort Jung, Ik Jae
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to identify differences in femur geometry between patients with subtrochanteric/shaft atypical femur fractures (AFFs) and the general population, and to evaluate the biomechanical factors related to femoral bowing in AFFs. We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients. Data on age, and history and duration of bisphosphonate use were evaluated. Femur computed tomography images were reconstructed into a 3D model, which was analyzed with a geometry analysis program to obtain the femur length, femur width and length, and femoral bowing. Patients were divided into two groups according to fracture location: the subtrochanteric and shaft AFF groups. We compared all parameters between groups, and also between each group and a general population of 300 women ≥ 60 years. Thirty-five patients had a history of bisphosphonate use (average duration, 6.1 years; range, 0.8–20 years). There was no statistical difference in bone turnover markers between the two groups. The shaft AFF group had a lower radius of curvature (ROC) (P = 0.001), lower bone mineral density (BMD, T score) (P = 0.020), and lower calcium (P = 0.016). However, other parameters and rate of bisphosphonate use were not significantly different. There were no significant differences in the parameters of the subtrochanter AFF group and the general population, but the shaft AFF group demonstrated a wider femur width (P < 0.001), longer anteroposterior length (P = 0.001), and lower ROC (P < 0.001) than the general population. Femoral bowing and width increased in shaft AFFs, but similar to subtrochanter AFFs compared to the general population. Our results highlight the biomechanical factors of femur geometry in AFFs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8683396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86833962021-12-20 Differences in femur geometry and bone markers in atypical femur fractures and the general population Jung, Ik Jae Kim, Ji Wan Sci Rep Article This study aimed to identify differences in femur geometry between patients with subtrochanteric/shaft atypical femur fractures (AFFs) and the general population, and to evaluate the biomechanical factors related to femoral bowing in AFFs. We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients. Data on age, and history and duration of bisphosphonate use were evaluated. Femur computed tomography images were reconstructed into a 3D model, which was analyzed with a geometry analysis program to obtain the femur length, femur width and length, and femoral bowing. Patients were divided into two groups according to fracture location: the subtrochanteric and shaft AFF groups. We compared all parameters between groups, and also between each group and a general population of 300 women ≥ 60 years. Thirty-five patients had a history of bisphosphonate use (average duration, 6.1 years; range, 0.8–20 years). There was no statistical difference in bone turnover markers between the two groups. The shaft AFF group had a lower radius of curvature (ROC) (P = 0.001), lower bone mineral density (BMD, T score) (P = 0.020), and lower calcium (P = 0.016). However, other parameters and rate of bisphosphonate use were not significantly different. There were no significant differences in the parameters of the subtrochanter AFF group and the general population, but the shaft AFF group demonstrated a wider femur width (P < 0.001), longer anteroposterior length (P = 0.001), and lower ROC (P < 0.001) than the general population. Femoral bowing and width increased in shaft AFFs, but similar to subtrochanter AFFs compared to the general population. Our results highlight the biomechanical factors of femur geometry in AFFs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8683396/ /pubmed/34921200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03603-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Jung, Ik Jae
Kim, Ji Wan
Differences in femur geometry and bone markers in atypical femur fractures and the general population
title Differences in femur geometry and bone markers in atypical femur fractures and the general population
title_full Differences in femur geometry and bone markers in atypical femur fractures and the general population
title_fullStr Differences in femur geometry and bone markers in atypical femur fractures and the general population
title_full_unstemmed Differences in femur geometry and bone markers in atypical femur fractures and the general population
title_short Differences in femur geometry and bone markers in atypical femur fractures and the general population
title_sort differences in femur geometry and bone markers in atypical femur fractures and the general population
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8683396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34921200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03603-2
work_keys_str_mv AT jungikjae differencesinfemurgeometryandbonemarkersinatypicalfemurfracturesandthegeneralpopulation
AT kimjiwan differencesinfemurgeometryandbonemarkersinatypicalfemurfracturesandthegeneralpopulation