Cargando…

Real‐world prognostic factors for survival among treated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: Many real‐world studies of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) are restricted to single centers, limiting the generalizability of their insights. This study aimed to identify important population‐based predictors for survival in patients diagnosed with mPDAC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Kenneth H., Ozer, Muhammet, Cockrum, Paul, Surinach, Andy, Wang, Shu, Chu, Bong Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8683530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34811961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4415
_version_ 1784617440548749312
author Yu, Kenneth H.
Ozer, Muhammet
Cockrum, Paul
Surinach, Andy
Wang, Shu
Chu, Bong Chul
author_facet Yu, Kenneth H.
Ozer, Muhammet
Cockrum, Paul
Surinach, Andy
Wang, Shu
Chu, Bong Chul
author_sort Yu, Kenneth H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many real‐world studies of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) are restricted to single centers, limiting the generalizability of their insights. This study aimed to identify important population‐based predictors for survival in patients diagnosed with mPDAC in a broader setting. METHODS: Data between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019 were extracted from the Flatiron Health EHR database. Treatment‐specific predictive models were generated for patients treated with first‐line gemcitabine+nab­paclitaxel (GNP), FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine monotherapy (gem‐mono), and second‐line liposomal irinotecan‐based regimens. The holdout method was used for cross‐validation. Age at diagnosis, sex, BMI, smoking status, and ECOG performance score were included in all models with additional demographic, clinical characteristics, and hematological function assessed for inclusion. RESULTS: Of the 3625 patients, 43% received GNP, 26% received FOLFIRINOX, 7% received gem‐mono, and 23% received other regimens; 40% (n = 1448) advanced to the second line. Among all first‐line patients, the following were included in the final model: prior surgery, white blood cell (WBC) counts, serum albumin (SA), liver function tests (LFTs), serum bilirubin, serum carbohydrate antigen 19–9, and ascites. Models for patients receiving specific therapies differed from the overall model, GNP (ascites removed), FOLFIRINOX (stage at initial diagnosis added), and gem‐mono (LFTs omitted). Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), SA, and WBC counts were important predictors of survival among patients treated with second‐line liposomal irinotecan. Across all regimens, the strongest predictors of survival were ECOG score, SA, and ALP. CONCLUSIONS: In this real‐world study of patients with mPDAC, important population prognostic factors of survival were identified in a large cohort of patients receiving systemic treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8683530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86835302021-12-30 Real‐world prognostic factors for survival among treated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Yu, Kenneth H. Ozer, Muhammet Cockrum, Paul Surinach, Andy Wang, Shu Chu, Bong Chul Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Many real‐world studies of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) are restricted to single centers, limiting the generalizability of their insights. This study aimed to identify important population‐based predictors for survival in patients diagnosed with mPDAC in a broader setting. METHODS: Data between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019 were extracted from the Flatiron Health EHR database. Treatment‐specific predictive models were generated for patients treated with first‐line gemcitabine+nab­paclitaxel (GNP), FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine monotherapy (gem‐mono), and second‐line liposomal irinotecan‐based regimens. The holdout method was used for cross‐validation. Age at diagnosis, sex, BMI, smoking status, and ECOG performance score were included in all models with additional demographic, clinical characteristics, and hematological function assessed for inclusion. RESULTS: Of the 3625 patients, 43% received GNP, 26% received FOLFIRINOX, 7% received gem‐mono, and 23% received other regimens; 40% (n = 1448) advanced to the second line. Among all first‐line patients, the following were included in the final model: prior surgery, white blood cell (WBC) counts, serum albumin (SA), liver function tests (LFTs), serum bilirubin, serum carbohydrate antigen 19–9, and ascites. Models for patients receiving specific therapies differed from the overall model, GNP (ascites removed), FOLFIRINOX (stage at initial diagnosis added), and gem‐mono (LFTs omitted). Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), SA, and WBC counts were important predictors of survival among patients treated with second‐line liposomal irinotecan. Across all regimens, the strongest predictors of survival were ECOG score, SA, and ALP. CONCLUSIONS: In this real‐world study of patients with mPDAC, important population prognostic factors of survival were identified in a large cohort of patients receiving systemic treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8683530/ /pubmed/34811961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4415 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Yu, Kenneth H.
Ozer, Muhammet
Cockrum, Paul
Surinach, Andy
Wang, Shu
Chu, Bong Chul
Real‐world prognostic factors for survival among treated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title Real‐world prognostic factors for survival among treated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_full Real‐world prognostic factors for survival among treated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Real‐world prognostic factors for survival among treated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Real‐world prognostic factors for survival among treated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_short Real‐world prognostic factors for survival among treated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_sort real‐world prognostic factors for survival among treated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8683530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34811961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4415
work_keys_str_mv AT yukennethh realworldprognosticfactorsforsurvivalamongtreatedpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT ozermuhammet realworldprognosticfactorsforsurvivalamongtreatedpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT cockrumpaul realworldprognosticfactorsforsurvivalamongtreatedpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT surinachandy realworldprognosticfactorsforsurvivalamongtreatedpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT wangshu realworldprognosticfactorsforsurvivalamongtreatedpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT chubongchul realworldprognosticfactorsforsurvivalamongtreatedpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma