Cargando…

Association between somatic RET mutations and clinical and genetic characteristics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Rearranged during transfection (RET) is a targetable oncogene. RET fusions have been reported in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, RET mutations in mCRC are less studied. Here, we aimed to characterize the clinical, pathological, and molecular landscape of RET‐m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Yuan‐Zhong, Hu, Wan‐Ming, Xia, Liang‐Ping, He, Wen‐Zhuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8683541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34741450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4400
_version_ 1784617442944745472
author Yang, Yuan‐Zhong
Hu, Wan‐Ming
Xia, Liang‐Ping
He, Wen‐Zhuo
author_facet Yang, Yuan‐Zhong
Hu, Wan‐Ming
Xia, Liang‐Ping
He, Wen‐Zhuo
author_sort Yang, Yuan‐Zhong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rearranged during transfection (RET) is a targetable oncogene. RET fusions have been reported in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, RET mutations in mCRC are less studied. Here, we aimed to characterize the clinical, pathological, and molecular landscape of RET‐mutated mCRC. METHODS: Five hundred and eighty‐two patients were included in this study. Next‐generation sequencing was performed to detect RET mutations and calculate tumor mutation burden (TMB). We compared the clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics of mCRC cases with tumors that harbored somatic RET mutations (N = 16, 2.7%) or had wild‐type RET (N = 566, 97.3%). RESULTS: Males comprised the absolute majority of cases with RET mutations (15/16 [93.8%]) compared to their fraction among cases with wild‐type RET (339/566 [59.9%]). Furthermore, all patients with RET mutations were younger than 60 years (16/16 [100%]), whereas such patients were less predominant in the group with wild‐type RET (379/566 [67.0%]). Individuals with tumors positive for RET mutations more frequently exhibited mucinous histology (5/16 [31.2%] vs. 55/566 [9.7%]), exhibited a lower incidence of liver metastasis (4/16 [25.0%] vs. 335/566 [59.2%]), and higher incidence of peritoneal metastasis (9/16 [56.2%] vs.161/566 [28.4%]), expressed wild‐type TP53 (8/16 [50.0%] vs.120/566 [21.2%]), and showed an increased frequency of MSI‐high (6/16 [37.5%] vs. 18/566 [3.2%]). In those with microsatellite‐stable mCRC, patients with RET mutations had a higher median TMB than patients with wild‐type RET (9.4 vs. 6.7 mutations/Mb, respectively, p = 0.001). The median progression‐free survival was similar in individuals with mutated and wild‐type RET on the oxaliplatin‐based regimen (7.1 vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.516). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that cases with RET mutations represent a separate mCRC subtype. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of RET inhibitors in mCRC patients with RET mutations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8683541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86835412021-12-30 Association between somatic RET mutations and clinical and genetic characteristics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer Yang, Yuan‐Zhong Hu, Wan‐Ming Xia, Liang‐Ping He, Wen‐Zhuo Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Rearranged during transfection (RET) is a targetable oncogene. RET fusions have been reported in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, RET mutations in mCRC are less studied. Here, we aimed to characterize the clinical, pathological, and molecular landscape of RET‐mutated mCRC. METHODS: Five hundred and eighty‐two patients were included in this study. Next‐generation sequencing was performed to detect RET mutations and calculate tumor mutation burden (TMB). We compared the clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics of mCRC cases with tumors that harbored somatic RET mutations (N = 16, 2.7%) or had wild‐type RET (N = 566, 97.3%). RESULTS: Males comprised the absolute majority of cases with RET mutations (15/16 [93.8%]) compared to their fraction among cases with wild‐type RET (339/566 [59.9%]). Furthermore, all patients with RET mutations were younger than 60 years (16/16 [100%]), whereas such patients were less predominant in the group with wild‐type RET (379/566 [67.0%]). Individuals with tumors positive for RET mutations more frequently exhibited mucinous histology (5/16 [31.2%] vs. 55/566 [9.7%]), exhibited a lower incidence of liver metastasis (4/16 [25.0%] vs. 335/566 [59.2%]), and higher incidence of peritoneal metastasis (9/16 [56.2%] vs.161/566 [28.4%]), expressed wild‐type TP53 (8/16 [50.0%] vs.120/566 [21.2%]), and showed an increased frequency of MSI‐high (6/16 [37.5%] vs. 18/566 [3.2%]). In those with microsatellite‐stable mCRC, patients with RET mutations had a higher median TMB than patients with wild‐type RET (9.4 vs. 6.7 mutations/Mb, respectively, p = 0.001). The median progression‐free survival was similar in individuals with mutated and wild‐type RET on the oxaliplatin‐based regimen (7.1 vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.516). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that cases with RET mutations represent a separate mCRC subtype. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of RET inhibitors in mCRC patients with RET mutations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8683541/ /pubmed/34741450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4400 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Yang, Yuan‐Zhong
Hu, Wan‐Ming
Xia, Liang‐Ping
He, Wen‐Zhuo
Association between somatic RET mutations and clinical and genetic characteristics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title Association between somatic RET mutations and clinical and genetic characteristics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full Association between somatic RET mutations and clinical and genetic characteristics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Association between somatic RET mutations and clinical and genetic characteristics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Association between somatic RET mutations and clinical and genetic characteristics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_short Association between somatic RET mutations and clinical and genetic characteristics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_sort association between somatic ret mutations and clinical and genetic characteristics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8683541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34741450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4400
work_keys_str_mv AT yangyuanzhong associationbetweensomaticretmutationsandclinicalandgeneticcharacteristicsinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT huwanming associationbetweensomaticretmutationsandclinicalandgeneticcharacteristicsinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT xialiangping associationbetweensomaticretmutationsandclinicalandgeneticcharacteristicsinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT hewenzhuo associationbetweensomaticretmutationsandclinicalandgeneticcharacteristicsinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer