Cargando…
Application of community – engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity
Community engagement is critical to accelerate and improve implementation of evidence-based interventions to reduce health inequities. Community-engaged dissemination and implementation research (CEDI) emphasizes engaging stakeholders (e.g., community members, practitioners, community organizations,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101620 |
_version_ | 1784617530522861568 |
---|---|
author | Schlechter, Chelsey R. Del Fiol, Guilherme Lam, Cho Y. Fernandez, Maria E. Greene, Tom Yack, Melissa Schulthies, Sandra Nelson, Marci Bohner, Claudia Pruhs, Alan Siaperas, Tracey Kawamoto, Kensaku Gibson, Bryan Nahum-Shani, Inbal Walker, Timothy J. Wetter, David W. |
author_facet | Schlechter, Chelsey R. Del Fiol, Guilherme Lam, Cho Y. Fernandez, Maria E. Greene, Tom Yack, Melissa Schulthies, Sandra Nelson, Marci Bohner, Claudia Pruhs, Alan Siaperas, Tracey Kawamoto, Kensaku Gibson, Bryan Nahum-Shani, Inbal Walker, Timothy J. Wetter, David W. |
author_sort | Schlechter, Chelsey R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Community engagement is critical to accelerate and improve implementation of evidence-based interventions to reduce health inequities. Community-engaged dissemination and implementation research (CEDI) emphasizes engaging stakeholders (e.g., community members, practitioners, community organizations, etc.) with diverse perspectives, experience, and expertise to provide tacit community knowledge regarding the local context, priorities, needs, and assets. Importantly, CEDI can help improve health inequities through incorporating unique perspectives from communities experiencing health inequities that have historically been left out of the research process. The community-engagement process that exists in practice can be highly variable, and characteristics of the process are often underreported, making it difficult to discern how engagement of community partners was used to improve implementation. This paper describes the community-engagement process for a multilevel, pragmatic randomized trial to increase the reach and impact of evidence-based tobacco cessation treatment among Community Health Center patients; describes how engagement activities and the resulting partnership informed the development of implementation strategies and improved the research process; and presents lessons learned to inform future CEDI research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8684008 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86840082021-12-30 Application of community – engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity Schlechter, Chelsey R. Del Fiol, Guilherme Lam, Cho Y. Fernandez, Maria E. Greene, Tom Yack, Melissa Schulthies, Sandra Nelson, Marci Bohner, Claudia Pruhs, Alan Siaperas, Tracey Kawamoto, Kensaku Gibson, Bryan Nahum-Shani, Inbal Walker, Timothy J. Wetter, David W. Prev Med Rep Regular Article Community engagement is critical to accelerate and improve implementation of evidence-based interventions to reduce health inequities. Community-engaged dissemination and implementation research (CEDI) emphasizes engaging stakeholders (e.g., community members, practitioners, community organizations, etc.) with diverse perspectives, experience, and expertise to provide tacit community knowledge regarding the local context, priorities, needs, and assets. Importantly, CEDI can help improve health inequities through incorporating unique perspectives from communities experiencing health inequities that have historically been left out of the research process. The community-engagement process that exists in practice can be highly variable, and characteristics of the process are often underreported, making it difficult to discern how engagement of community partners was used to improve implementation. This paper describes the community-engagement process for a multilevel, pragmatic randomized trial to increase the reach and impact of evidence-based tobacco cessation treatment among Community Health Center patients; describes how engagement activities and the resulting partnership informed the development of implementation strategies and improved the research process; and presents lessons learned to inform future CEDI research. 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8684008/ /pubmed/34976676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101620 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Schlechter, Chelsey R. Del Fiol, Guilherme Lam, Cho Y. Fernandez, Maria E. Greene, Tom Yack, Melissa Schulthies, Sandra Nelson, Marci Bohner, Claudia Pruhs, Alan Siaperas, Tracey Kawamoto, Kensaku Gibson, Bryan Nahum-Shani, Inbal Walker, Timothy J. Wetter, David W. Application of community – engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity |
title | Application of community – engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity |
title_full | Application of community – engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity |
title_fullStr | Application of community – engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of community – engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity |
title_short | Application of community – engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity |
title_sort | application of community – engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101620 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schlechterchelseyr applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT delfiolguilherme applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT lamchoy applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT fernandezmariae applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT greenetom applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT yackmelissa applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT schulthiessandra applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT nelsonmarci applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT bohnerclaudia applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT pruhsalan applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT siaperastracey applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT kawamotokensaku applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT gibsonbryan applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT nahumshaniinbal applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT walkertimothyj applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity AT wetterdavidw applicationofcommunityengageddisseminationandimplementationsciencetoimprovehealthequity |