Cargando…

The association of Step-based metrics and adiposity in the Hispanic community Health Study/Study of Latinos

OBJECTIVE: Examine cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of accelerometer measured step volume (steps/day) and cadence with adiposity and six-year changes in adiposity in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). METHODS: HCHS/SOL’s target population was 60% female wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schilsky, Samantha, Sotres-Alvarez, Daniela, Rosamond, Wayne D., Heiss, Gerardo, Stevens, June, Butera, Nicole, Cai, Jianwen, Carlson, Jordan A, Cuthbertson, Carmen, Daviglus, Martha, LeCroy, Madison N., Pirzada, Amber, Evenson, Kelly R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101655
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Examine cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of accelerometer measured step volume (steps/day) and cadence with adiposity and six-year changes in adiposity in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). METHODS: HCHS/SOL’s target population was 60% female with a mean age of 41 years. Cross-sectional (n = 12,353) and longitudinal analyses (n = 9,077) leveraged adjusted complex survey regression models to examine associations between steps/day, and cadence with weight (kg), waist circumference (cm) and body mass index (kg/m(2)). Effect measure modification by covariates was examined. RESULTS: Lower steps/day and intensity was associated with higher adiposity at baseline. Compared to those in the highest quartile of steps/day those in the lowest quartile have 1.42 95% CI (1.19, 1.70) times the odds of obesity. Compared to those in the highest categories of cadence step-based metrics, those in the lowest categories had a 1.62 95% CI (1.36, 1.93), 2.12 95% CI (1.63, 2.75) and 1.41 95% CI (1.16, 1.70) odds of obesity for peak 30-minute cadence, brisk walking and faster ambulation and bouts of purposeful steps and faster ambulation, respectively. Compared to those with the highest stepping cadences, those with the slowest peak 30-minute cadence and fewest minutes in bouts of purposeful steps and faster ambulation had 0.72 95% CI (0.57, 0.89) and 0.82 95% CI (0.60, 1.14) times the odds of gaining weight, respectively. CONCLUSION: Inverse cross-sectional relationships were found for steps/day and cadence and adiposity. Over a six-year period, higher step intensity but not volume was associated with higher odds of gaining weight.