Cargando…

Finite Element Analysis of Horizontal Screw-Screw Crosslink Used in C1–C2 Pedicle Screw-Rod Fixation

BACKGROUND: In the craniocervical junction, a C1–C2 pedicle screw-rod (PSR) fixation is applied to provide stability. The horizontal rod-rod crosslink (hR-R CL) is often used to enhance segmental posterior instrumentation. However, the biomechanics of the alternative horizontal screw-screw crosslink...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouyang, Beiping, Zou, Xiaobao, Luo, Chunshan, Lu, Tingsheng, Xia, Hong, Ma, Xiangyang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34903706
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.932026
_version_ 1784617578950295552
author Ouyang, Beiping
Zou, Xiaobao
Luo, Chunshan
Lu, Tingsheng
Xia, Hong
Ma, Xiangyang
author_facet Ouyang, Beiping
Zou, Xiaobao
Luo, Chunshan
Lu, Tingsheng
Xia, Hong
Ma, Xiangyang
author_sort Ouyang, Beiping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the craniocervical junction, a C1–C2 pedicle screw-rod (PSR) fixation is applied to provide stability. The horizontal rod-rod crosslink (hR-R CL) is often used to enhance segmental posterior instrumentation. However, the biomechanics of the alternative horizontal screw-screw crosslink (hS-S CL) in the craniocervical junction are unclear. MATERIAL/METHODS: A nonlinear atlantoaxial instability 3-dimensional C1–C2 finite element model was constructed using computed tomography images. On this basis, 2 fixation models were established with C1–C2 PSR fixation using (1) a rod-rod crosslink (R-R CL), and (2) a screw-screw crosslink (S-S CL). Range of motion (ROM) of the atlantoaxial joint, stress distribution of the implants, and maximum stress value of the vertebral bodies were calculated and compared under 4 loading conditions, including flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. RESULTS: Atlantoaxial joint ROM was reduced by 90.19% to 98.5% with the hR-R CL, and by 90.1% to 98.7% with the hS-S CL, compared with the instability model. During axial rotation, the total stress peak of the PSR fixation was smaller with hS-S CL than with hR-R CL. The peak stress values of the vertebral bodies were comparable between the 2 fixation models. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 tested crosslink models provided comparable stability. However, during axial rotation, the total stress peak of hS-S CL fixation was smaller than that of hR-R CL fixation. Since the atlantoaxial joint primarily functions as a rotational joint, our results suggested that the use of hS-S CL can provide a more stable environment for the implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8684241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86842412022-01-06 Finite Element Analysis of Horizontal Screw-Screw Crosslink Used in C1–C2 Pedicle Screw-Rod Fixation Ouyang, Beiping Zou, Xiaobao Luo, Chunshan Lu, Tingsheng Xia, Hong Ma, Xiangyang Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: In the craniocervical junction, a C1–C2 pedicle screw-rod (PSR) fixation is applied to provide stability. The horizontal rod-rod crosslink (hR-R CL) is often used to enhance segmental posterior instrumentation. However, the biomechanics of the alternative horizontal screw-screw crosslink (hS-S CL) in the craniocervical junction are unclear. MATERIAL/METHODS: A nonlinear atlantoaxial instability 3-dimensional C1–C2 finite element model was constructed using computed tomography images. On this basis, 2 fixation models were established with C1–C2 PSR fixation using (1) a rod-rod crosslink (R-R CL), and (2) a screw-screw crosslink (S-S CL). Range of motion (ROM) of the atlantoaxial joint, stress distribution of the implants, and maximum stress value of the vertebral bodies were calculated and compared under 4 loading conditions, including flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. RESULTS: Atlantoaxial joint ROM was reduced by 90.19% to 98.5% with the hR-R CL, and by 90.1% to 98.7% with the hS-S CL, compared with the instability model. During axial rotation, the total stress peak of the PSR fixation was smaller with hS-S CL than with hR-R CL. The peak stress values of the vertebral bodies were comparable between the 2 fixation models. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 tested crosslink models provided comparable stability. However, during axial rotation, the total stress peak of hS-S CL fixation was smaller than that of hR-R CL fixation. Since the atlantoaxial joint primarily functions as a rotational joint, our results suggested that the use of hS-S CL can provide a more stable environment for the implants. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8684241/ /pubmed/34903706 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.932026 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Ouyang, Beiping
Zou, Xiaobao
Luo, Chunshan
Lu, Tingsheng
Xia, Hong
Ma, Xiangyang
Finite Element Analysis of Horizontal Screw-Screw Crosslink Used in C1–C2 Pedicle Screw-Rod Fixation
title Finite Element Analysis of Horizontal Screw-Screw Crosslink Used in C1–C2 Pedicle Screw-Rod Fixation
title_full Finite Element Analysis of Horizontal Screw-Screw Crosslink Used in C1–C2 Pedicle Screw-Rod Fixation
title_fullStr Finite Element Analysis of Horizontal Screw-Screw Crosslink Used in C1–C2 Pedicle Screw-Rod Fixation
title_full_unstemmed Finite Element Analysis of Horizontal Screw-Screw Crosslink Used in C1–C2 Pedicle Screw-Rod Fixation
title_short Finite Element Analysis of Horizontal Screw-Screw Crosslink Used in C1–C2 Pedicle Screw-Rod Fixation
title_sort finite element analysis of horizontal screw-screw crosslink used in c1–c2 pedicle screw-rod fixation
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34903706
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.932026
work_keys_str_mv AT ouyangbeiping finiteelementanalysisofhorizontalscrewscrewcrosslinkusedinc1c2pediclescrewrodfixation
AT zouxiaobao finiteelementanalysisofhorizontalscrewscrewcrosslinkusedinc1c2pediclescrewrodfixation
AT luochunshan finiteelementanalysisofhorizontalscrewscrewcrosslinkusedinc1c2pediclescrewrodfixation
AT lutingsheng finiteelementanalysisofhorizontalscrewscrewcrosslinkusedinc1c2pediclescrewrodfixation
AT xiahong finiteelementanalysisofhorizontalscrewscrewcrosslinkusedinc1c2pediclescrewrodfixation
AT maxiangyang finiteelementanalysisofhorizontalscrewscrewcrosslinkusedinc1c2pediclescrewrodfixation