Cargando…
Comparison of novel rapid diagnostic of blood culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Accelerate Pheno system and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panels
BACKGROUND: Conventional turnaround time (TAT) for positive blood culture (PBC) identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is 2–3 days. We evaluated the TAT and ID/AST performance using clinical and seeded samples directly from PBC bottles with different commercial approaches...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34922463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02403-y |
_version_ | 1784617581863239680 |
---|---|
author | Sze, Dorothy T. T. Lau, Candy C. Y. Chan, Tsz-Ming Ma, Edmond S. K. Tang, Bone S. F. |
author_facet | Sze, Dorothy T. T. Lau, Candy C. Y. Chan, Tsz-Ming Ma, Edmond S. K. Tang, Bone S. F. |
author_sort | Sze, Dorothy T. T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Conventional turnaround time (TAT) for positive blood culture (PBC) identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is 2–3 days. We evaluated the TAT and ID/AST performance using clinical and seeded samples directly from PBC bottles with different commercial approaches: (1) Accelerate Pheno® system (Pheno) for ID/AST; (2) BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel and/ or BCID2 for ID; (3) direct AST by VITEK® 2 (direct AST); and (4) overnight culture using VITEK® 2 colony AST. RESULTS: A total of 141 PBC samples were included in this evaluation. Using MALDI-TOF (Bruker MALDI Biotyper) as the reference method for ID, the overall monomicrobial ID sensitivity/specificity are as follows: Pheno 97.9/99.9%; BCID 100/100%; and BCID2 100/100%, respectively. For AST performance, broth microdilution (BMD) was used as the reference method. For gram-negatives, overall categorical and essential agreements (CA/EA) for each method were: Pheno 90.3/93.2%; direct AST 92.6/88.5%; colony AST 94.4/89.5%, respectively. For gram-positives, the overall CA/EAs were as follows: Pheno 97.2/98.89%; direct AST 97.2/100%; colony AST 97.2/100%, respectively. The BCID/BCID2 and direct AST TATs were around 9–20 h (1/9-19 h for ID with resistance markers/AST), with 15 min/sample hands-on time. In comparison, Pheno TATs were around 8–10 h (1.5/7 h for ID/AST) with 2 min/sample hands-on time, maintains a clinically relevant fast report of antibiotic minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and allows for less TAT and hands-on time. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study conducted as such in Asia; all studied approaches achieved satisfactory performance, factors such as TAT, panel of antibiotics choices and hands-on time should be considered for the selection of appropriate rapid ID and AST of PBC methods in different laboratory settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-021-02403-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8684256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86842562021-12-20 Comparison of novel rapid diagnostic of blood culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Accelerate Pheno system and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panels Sze, Dorothy T. T. Lau, Candy C. Y. Chan, Tsz-Ming Ma, Edmond S. K. Tang, Bone S. F. BMC Microbiol Research BACKGROUND: Conventional turnaround time (TAT) for positive blood culture (PBC) identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is 2–3 days. We evaluated the TAT and ID/AST performance using clinical and seeded samples directly from PBC bottles with different commercial approaches: (1) Accelerate Pheno® system (Pheno) for ID/AST; (2) BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel and/ or BCID2 for ID; (3) direct AST by VITEK® 2 (direct AST); and (4) overnight culture using VITEK® 2 colony AST. RESULTS: A total of 141 PBC samples were included in this evaluation. Using MALDI-TOF (Bruker MALDI Biotyper) as the reference method for ID, the overall monomicrobial ID sensitivity/specificity are as follows: Pheno 97.9/99.9%; BCID 100/100%; and BCID2 100/100%, respectively. For AST performance, broth microdilution (BMD) was used as the reference method. For gram-negatives, overall categorical and essential agreements (CA/EA) for each method were: Pheno 90.3/93.2%; direct AST 92.6/88.5%; colony AST 94.4/89.5%, respectively. For gram-positives, the overall CA/EAs were as follows: Pheno 97.2/98.89%; direct AST 97.2/100%; colony AST 97.2/100%, respectively. The BCID/BCID2 and direct AST TATs were around 9–20 h (1/9-19 h for ID with resistance markers/AST), with 15 min/sample hands-on time. In comparison, Pheno TATs were around 8–10 h (1.5/7 h for ID/AST) with 2 min/sample hands-on time, maintains a clinically relevant fast report of antibiotic minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and allows for less TAT and hands-on time. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study conducted as such in Asia; all studied approaches achieved satisfactory performance, factors such as TAT, panel of antibiotics choices and hands-on time should be considered for the selection of appropriate rapid ID and AST of PBC methods in different laboratory settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-021-02403-y. BioMed Central 2021-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8684256/ /pubmed/34922463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02403-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sze, Dorothy T. T. Lau, Candy C. Y. Chan, Tsz-Ming Ma, Edmond S. K. Tang, Bone S. F. Comparison of novel rapid diagnostic of blood culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Accelerate Pheno system and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panels |
title | Comparison of novel rapid diagnostic of blood culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Accelerate Pheno system and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panels |
title_full | Comparison of novel rapid diagnostic of blood culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Accelerate Pheno system and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panels |
title_fullStr | Comparison of novel rapid diagnostic of blood culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Accelerate Pheno system and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panels |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of novel rapid diagnostic of blood culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Accelerate Pheno system and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panels |
title_short | Comparison of novel rapid diagnostic of blood culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Accelerate Pheno system and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panels |
title_sort | comparison of novel rapid diagnostic of blood culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by accelerate pheno system and biofire filmarray blood culture identification and biofire filmarray blood culture identification 2 panels |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34922463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02403-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szedorothytt comparisonofnovelrapiddiagnosticofbloodcultureidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingbyacceleratephenosystemandbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentificationandbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panels AT laucandycy comparisonofnovelrapiddiagnosticofbloodcultureidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingbyacceleratephenosystemandbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentificationandbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panels AT chantszming comparisonofnovelrapiddiagnosticofbloodcultureidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingbyacceleratephenosystemandbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentificationandbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panels AT maedmondsk comparisonofnovelrapiddiagnosticofbloodcultureidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingbyacceleratephenosystemandbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentificationandbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panels AT tangbonesf comparisonofnovelrapiddiagnosticofbloodcultureidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingbyacceleratephenosystemandbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentificationandbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panels |