Cargando…
A Hybrid Deep Learning Construct for Detecting Keratoconus From Corneal Maps
PURPOSE: To develop and assess the accuracy of a hybrid deep learning construct for detecting keratoconus (KCN) based on corneal topographic maps. METHODS: We collected 3794 corneal images from 542 eyes of 280 subjects and developed seven deep learning models based on anterior and posterior eccentri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34913952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.14.16 |
_version_ | 1784617593938640896 |
---|---|
author | Al-Timemy, Ali H. Mosa, Zahraa M. Alyasseri, Zaid Lavric, Alexandru Lui, Marcelo M. Hazarbassanov, Rossen M. Yousefi, Siamak |
author_facet | Al-Timemy, Ali H. Mosa, Zahraa M. Alyasseri, Zaid Lavric, Alexandru Lui, Marcelo M. Hazarbassanov, Rossen M. Yousefi, Siamak |
author_sort | Al-Timemy, Ali H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To develop and assess the accuracy of a hybrid deep learning construct for detecting keratoconus (KCN) based on corneal topographic maps. METHODS: We collected 3794 corneal images from 542 eyes of 280 subjects and developed seven deep learning models based on anterior and posterior eccentricity, anterior and posterior elevation, anterior and posterior sagittal curvature, and corneal thickness maps to extract deep corneal features. An independent subset with 1050 images collected from 150 eyes of 85 subjects from a separate center was used to validate models. We developed a hybrid deep learning model to detect KCN. We visualized deep features of corneal parameters to assess the quality of learning subjectively and computed area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrices, accuracy, and F1 score to evaluate models objectively. RESULTS: In the development dataset, 204 eyes were normal, 123 eyes were suspected KCN, and 215 eyes had KCN. In the independent validation dataset, 50 eyes were normal, 50 eyes were suspected KCN, and 50 eyes were KCN. Images were annotated by three corneal specialists. The AUC of the models for the two-class and three-class problems based on the development set were 0.99 and 0.93, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid deep learning model achieved high accuracy in identifying KCN based on corneal maps and provided a time-efficient framework with low computational complexity. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Deep learning can detect KCN from non-invasive corneal images with high accuracy, suggesting potential application in research and clinical practice to identify KCN. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8684312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86843122022-01-06 A Hybrid Deep Learning Construct for Detecting Keratoconus From Corneal Maps Al-Timemy, Ali H. Mosa, Zahraa M. Alyasseri, Zaid Lavric, Alexandru Lui, Marcelo M. Hazarbassanov, Rossen M. Yousefi, Siamak Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To develop and assess the accuracy of a hybrid deep learning construct for detecting keratoconus (KCN) based on corneal topographic maps. METHODS: We collected 3794 corneal images from 542 eyes of 280 subjects and developed seven deep learning models based on anterior and posterior eccentricity, anterior and posterior elevation, anterior and posterior sagittal curvature, and corneal thickness maps to extract deep corneal features. An independent subset with 1050 images collected from 150 eyes of 85 subjects from a separate center was used to validate models. We developed a hybrid deep learning model to detect KCN. We visualized deep features of corneal parameters to assess the quality of learning subjectively and computed area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrices, accuracy, and F1 score to evaluate models objectively. RESULTS: In the development dataset, 204 eyes were normal, 123 eyes were suspected KCN, and 215 eyes had KCN. In the independent validation dataset, 50 eyes were normal, 50 eyes were suspected KCN, and 50 eyes were KCN. Images were annotated by three corneal specialists. The AUC of the models for the two-class and three-class problems based on the development set were 0.99 and 0.93, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid deep learning model achieved high accuracy in identifying KCN based on corneal maps and provided a time-efficient framework with low computational complexity. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Deep learning can detect KCN from non-invasive corneal images with high accuracy, suggesting potential application in research and clinical practice to identify KCN. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8684312/ /pubmed/34913952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.14.16 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Al-Timemy, Ali H. Mosa, Zahraa M. Alyasseri, Zaid Lavric, Alexandru Lui, Marcelo M. Hazarbassanov, Rossen M. Yousefi, Siamak A Hybrid Deep Learning Construct for Detecting Keratoconus From Corneal Maps |
title | A Hybrid Deep Learning Construct for Detecting Keratoconus From Corneal Maps |
title_full | A Hybrid Deep Learning Construct for Detecting Keratoconus From Corneal Maps |
title_fullStr | A Hybrid Deep Learning Construct for Detecting Keratoconus From Corneal Maps |
title_full_unstemmed | A Hybrid Deep Learning Construct for Detecting Keratoconus From Corneal Maps |
title_short | A Hybrid Deep Learning Construct for Detecting Keratoconus From Corneal Maps |
title_sort | hybrid deep learning construct for detecting keratoconus from corneal maps |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34913952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.14.16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT altimemyalih ahybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps AT mosazahraam ahybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps AT alyasserizaid ahybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps AT lavricalexandru ahybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps AT luimarcelom ahybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps AT hazarbassanovrossenm ahybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps AT yousefisiamak ahybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps AT altimemyalih hybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps AT mosazahraam hybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps AT alyasserizaid hybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps AT lavricalexandru hybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps AT luimarcelom hybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps AT hazarbassanovrossenm hybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps AT yousefisiamak hybriddeeplearningconstructfordetectingkeratoconusfromcornealmaps |