Cargando…

Randomized clinical trial to evaluate two methods of caries risk assessment in schoolchildren: the CARDEC-PEL 04 study protocol

BACKGROUND: Caries risk assessment is an essential element for managing and preventing dental caries in children. Individual caries risk assessment can be conducted to evaluate the presence or absence of single factors, or using multivariate models, a combination of factors. The subject has been ext...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menegaz, Aryane Marques, Oliveira, Thays Torres do Vale, Braga, Mariana Minatel, Raggio, Daniela Prócida, Cenci, Maximiliano Sergio, Mendes, Fausto Medeiros, Azevedo, Marina Sousa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34922527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02010-3
_version_ 1784617599079809024
author Menegaz, Aryane Marques
Oliveira, Thays Torres do Vale
Braga, Mariana Minatel
Raggio, Daniela Prócida
Cenci, Maximiliano Sergio
Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
Azevedo, Marina Sousa
author_facet Menegaz, Aryane Marques
Oliveira, Thays Torres do Vale
Braga, Mariana Minatel
Raggio, Daniela Prócida
Cenci, Maximiliano Sergio
Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
Azevedo, Marina Sousa
author_sort Menegaz, Aryane Marques
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caries risk assessment is an essential element for managing and preventing dental caries in children. Individual caries risk assessment can be conducted to evaluate the presence or absence of single factors, or using multivariate models, a combination of factors. The subject has been extensively studied, but no previous research has compared whether a more elaborate and individualized method of caries risk benefits the patient than more straightforward strategies. Thus, this protocol evaluates the efficacy of two risk assessment methods for caries control in children, a simplified method based on caries experience evaluation and a multivariate method described in the literature. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-treatment trial protocol. Two groups will be tested for two forms of caries risk assessment: an individualized and detailed multivariate method based on the guidelines of the Caries Care International 4D and another simplified process, based only on caries experience in primary and/or permanent dentition, considering the presence of decayed, missing and filled teeth using the DMFT/dmft index. Participants will be children aged 8 to 11 years, followed up at 12 and 24 months. The primary outcome will be a composite outcome representing the number of tooth surfaces requiring operative intervention (account variable). In addition, the Shapiro–Wilk normality test and Student's t-test will be performed. A multivariate analysis using negative binomial regression will compare groups in the intention-to-treat population, considering a two-tailed significance level of 5%. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized clinical trial aiming to compare dental caries-related treatment and follow-up based on a detailed, multivariate and individualized assessment of caries risk in school-age children to a simpler risk assessment strategy based on caries experience. This study will define whether there are essential benefits to the patient that justify the choice of one method over the other. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT03969628. Registered on May 31th, 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-021-02010-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8684335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86843352021-12-20 Randomized clinical trial to evaluate two methods of caries risk assessment in schoolchildren: the CARDEC-PEL 04 study protocol Menegaz, Aryane Marques Oliveira, Thays Torres do Vale Braga, Mariana Minatel Raggio, Daniela Prócida Cenci, Maximiliano Sergio Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Azevedo, Marina Sousa BMC Oral Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Caries risk assessment is an essential element for managing and preventing dental caries in children. Individual caries risk assessment can be conducted to evaluate the presence or absence of single factors, or using multivariate models, a combination of factors. The subject has been extensively studied, but no previous research has compared whether a more elaborate and individualized method of caries risk benefits the patient than more straightforward strategies. Thus, this protocol evaluates the efficacy of two risk assessment methods for caries control in children, a simplified method based on caries experience evaluation and a multivariate method described in the literature. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-treatment trial protocol. Two groups will be tested for two forms of caries risk assessment: an individualized and detailed multivariate method based on the guidelines of the Caries Care International 4D and another simplified process, based only on caries experience in primary and/or permanent dentition, considering the presence of decayed, missing and filled teeth using the DMFT/dmft index. Participants will be children aged 8 to 11 years, followed up at 12 and 24 months. The primary outcome will be a composite outcome representing the number of tooth surfaces requiring operative intervention (account variable). In addition, the Shapiro–Wilk normality test and Student's t-test will be performed. A multivariate analysis using negative binomial regression will compare groups in the intention-to-treat population, considering a two-tailed significance level of 5%. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized clinical trial aiming to compare dental caries-related treatment and follow-up based on a detailed, multivariate and individualized assessment of caries risk in school-age children to a simpler risk assessment strategy based on caries experience. This study will define whether there are essential benefits to the patient that justify the choice of one method over the other. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT03969628. Registered on May 31th, 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-021-02010-3. BioMed Central 2021-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8684335/ /pubmed/34922527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02010-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Menegaz, Aryane Marques
Oliveira, Thays Torres do Vale
Braga, Mariana Minatel
Raggio, Daniela Prócida
Cenci, Maximiliano Sergio
Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
Azevedo, Marina Sousa
Randomized clinical trial to evaluate two methods of caries risk assessment in schoolchildren: the CARDEC-PEL 04 study protocol
title Randomized clinical trial to evaluate two methods of caries risk assessment in schoolchildren: the CARDEC-PEL 04 study protocol
title_full Randomized clinical trial to evaluate two methods of caries risk assessment in schoolchildren: the CARDEC-PEL 04 study protocol
title_fullStr Randomized clinical trial to evaluate two methods of caries risk assessment in schoolchildren: the CARDEC-PEL 04 study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Randomized clinical trial to evaluate two methods of caries risk assessment in schoolchildren: the CARDEC-PEL 04 study protocol
title_short Randomized clinical trial to evaluate two methods of caries risk assessment in schoolchildren: the CARDEC-PEL 04 study protocol
title_sort randomized clinical trial to evaluate two methods of caries risk assessment in schoolchildren: the cardec-pel 04 study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34922527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02010-3
work_keys_str_mv AT menegazaryanemarques randomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetwomethodsofcariesriskassessmentinschoolchildrenthecardecpel04studyprotocol
AT oliveirathaystorresdovale randomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetwomethodsofcariesriskassessmentinschoolchildrenthecardecpel04studyprotocol
AT bragamarianaminatel randomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetwomethodsofcariesriskassessmentinschoolchildrenthecardecpel04studyprotocol
AT raggiodanielaprocida randomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetwomethodsofcariesriskassessmentinschoolchildrenthecardecpel04studyprotocol
AT cencimaximilianosergio randomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetwomethodsofcariesriskassessmentinschoolchildrenthecardecpel04studyprotocol
AT mendesfaustomedeiros randomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetwomethodsofcariesriskassessmentinschoolchildrenthecardecpel04studyprotocol
AT azevedomarinasousa randomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetwomethodsofcariesriskassessmentinschoolchildrenthecardecpel04studyprotocol