Cargando…

Retrospective Analysis and Comparison of 48 Intracranial Meningioma Cases As Two Groups According to Their Size

Objective This study aims to examine the possible demographic, clinical, and surgical differences between giant and smaller meningiomas. Materials and Methods Forty-eight meningioma patients who were operated on in our clinic between 2016-2020 were included in our study. Fourteen meningiomas larger...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gündüz, Hasan Burak, Esen Aydın, Ayşegül, Karataş Okumuş, Seda Yağmur, Çevik, Orhun Mete, Sofuoğlu, Özden Erhan, Uysal, Mustafa Levent, Asiltürk, Murad, Güneş, Müslüm, Ovalıoğlu, Talat Cem, Emel, Erhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934575
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19709
_version_ 1784617602116485120
author Gündüz, Hasan Burak
Esen Aydın, Ayşegül
Karataş Okumuş, Seda Yağmur
Çevik, Orhun Mete
Sofuoğlu, Özden Erhan
Uysal, Mustafa Levent
Asiltürk, Murad
Güneş, Müslüm
Ovalıoğlu, Talat Cem
Emel, Erhan
author_facet Gündüz, Hasan Burak
Esen Aydın, Ayşegül
Karataş Okumuş, Seda Yağmur
Çevik, Orhun Mete
Sofuoğlu, Özden Erhan
Uysal, Mustafa Levent
Asiltürk, Murad
Güneş, Müslüm
Ovalıoğlu, Talat Cem
Emel, Erhan
author_sort Gündüz, Hasan Burak
collection PubMed
description Objective This study aims to examine the possible demographic, clinical, and surgical differences between giant and smaller meningiomas. Materials and Methods Forty-eight meningioma patients who were operated on in our clinic between 2016-2020 were included in our study. Fourteen meningiomas larger than 5 cm in diameter were defined as giant meningiomas and placed in group 1. Thirty-four remaining meningiomas, with sizes less than 5 cm, were placed in group 2. These patients were evaluated regarding age, sex, localization, symptoms and neurological findings, surgical results, histopathology, and postoperative results. Results The most common localization in group 1 was falcine-parasagittal, whereas in group 2 it was convexity. Simpson’s grade I resection rate in group 1 was 35.71%, while in group 2 this rate was 67.65%. In histopathological examination, transitional type meningiomas (35.71%) were the most common in group 1, whereas fibrous type meningiomas (32.35%) were seen the most in group 2. Group 1 Karnofsky Performance Scale score average was 75.71 preoperatively and 85.71 postoperatively. In group 2, the preoperative and postoperative average was 97.35 and 96.76, respectively. The comparative statistical analysis reflects that: A) Resection rates were significantly lower in the giant meningioma group. B) Similarly, Karnofsky Performance Scale scores were also lower than group 2. C) When statistical comparisons were made according to sex, age, localization, histopathological results, postoperative complications, and recurrence rates, no significant differences were observed. Conclusion The term “Giant Meningioma” is a type of distinction that is frequently made in the literature. However, the single major difference we see in our study was the surgical results. The general condition of patients before and after surgery may be more critical than others in giant meningiomas. Although surgical resection is the main form of treatment in giant meningiomas, the risks arising from the size of the tumor should be taken into account, and necessary plans should be made for a successful surgical intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8684358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86843582021-12-20 Retrospective Analysis and Comparison of 48 Intracranial Meningioma Cases As Two Groups According to Their Size Gündüz, Hasan Burak Esen Aydın, Ayşegül Karataş Okumuş, Seda Yağmur Çevik, Orhun Mete Sofuoğlu, Özden Erhan Uysal, Mustafa Levent Asiltürk, Murad Güneş, Müslüm Ovalıoğlu, Talat Cem Emel, Erhan Cureus Neurosurgery Objective This study aims to examine the possible demographic, clinical, and surgical differences between giant and smaller meningiomas. Materials and Methods Forty-eight meningioma patients who were operated on in our clinic between 2016-2020 were included in our study. Fourteen meningiomas larger than 5 cm in diameter were defined as giant meningiomas and placed in group 1. Thirty-four remaining meningiomas, with sizes less than 5 cm, were placed in group 2. These patients were evaluated regarding age, sex, localization, symptoms and neurological findings, surgical results, histopathology, and postoperative results. Results The most common localization in group 1 was falcine-parasagittal, whereas in group 2 it was convexity. Simpson’s grade I resection rate in group 1 was 35.71%, while in group 2 this rate was 67.65%. In histopathological examination, transitional type meningiomas (35.71%) were the most common in group 1, whereas fibrous type meningiomas (32.35%) were seen the most in group 2. Group 1 Karnofsky Performance Scale score average was 75.71 preoperatively and 85.71 postoperatively. In group 2, the preoperative and postoperative average was 97.35 and 96.76, respectively. The comparative statistical analysis reflects that: A) Resection rates were significantly lower in the giant meningioma group. B) Similarly, Karnofsky Performance Scale scores were also lower than group 2. C) When statistical comparisons were made according to sex, age, localization, histopathological results, postoperative complications, and recurrence rates, no significant differences were observed. Conclusion The term “Giant Meningioma” is a type of distinction that is frequently made in the literature. However, the single major difference we see in our study was the surgical results. The general condition of patients before and after surgery may be more critical than others in giant meningiomas. Although surgical resection is the main form of treatment in giant meningiomas, the risks arising from the size of the tumor should be taken into account, and necessary plans should be made for a successful surgical intervention. Cureus 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8684358/ /pubmed/34934575 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19709 Text en Copyright © 2021, Gündüz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurosurgery
Gündüz, Hasan Burak
Esen Aydın, Ayşegül
Karataş Okumuş, Seda Yağmur
Çevik, Orhun Mete
Sofuoğlu, Özden Erhan
Uysal, Mustafa Levent
Asiltürk, Murad
Güneş, Müslüm
Ovalıoğlu, Talat Cem
Emel, Erhan
Retrospective Analysis and Comparison of 48 Intracranial Meningioma Cases As Two Groups According to Their Size
title Retrospective Analysis and Comparison of 48 Intracranial Meningioma Cases As Two Groups According to Their Size
title_full Retrospective Analysis and Comparison of 48 Intracranial Meningioma Cases As Two Groups According to Their Size
title_fullStr Retrospective Analysis and Comparison of 48 Intracranial Meningioma Cases As Two Groups According to Their Size
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Analysis and Comparison of 48 Intracranial Meningioma Cases As Two Groups According to Their Size
title_short Retrospective Analysis and Comparison of 48 Intracranial Meningioma Cases As Two Groups According to Their Size
title_sort retrospective analysis and comparison of 48 intracranial meningioma cases as two groups according to their size
topic Neurosurgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934575
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19709
work_keys_str_mv AT gunduzhasanburak retrospectiveanalysisandcomparisonof48intracranialmeningiomacasesastwogroupsaccordingtotheirsize
AT esenaydınaysegul retrospectiveanalysisandcomparisonof48intracranialmeningiomacasesastwogroupsaccordingtotheirsize
AT karatasokumussedayagmur retrospectiveanalysisandcomparisonof48intracranialmeningiomacasesastwogroupsaccordingtotheirsize
AT cevikorhunmete retrospectiveanalysisandcomparisonof48intracranialmeningiomacasesastwogroupsaccordingtotheirsize
AT sofuogluozdenerhan retrospectiveanalysisandcomparisonof48intracranialmeningiomacasesastwogroupsaccordingtotheirsize
AT uysalmustafalevent retrospectiveanalysisandcomparisonof48intracranialmeningiomacasesastwogroupsaccordingtotheirsize
AT asilturkmurad retrospectiveanalysisandcomparisonof48intracranialmeningiomacasesastwogroupsaccordingtotheirsize
AT gunesmuslum retrospectiveanalysisandcomparisonof48intracranialmeningiomacasesastwogroupsaccordingtotheirsize
AT ovalıoglutalatcem retrospectiveanalysisandcomparisonof48intracranialmeningiomacasesastwogroupsaccordingtotheirsize
AT emelerhan retrospectiveanalysisandcomparisonof48intracranialmeningiomacasesastwogroupsaccordingtotheirsize