Cargando…

Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment – A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the priorities and preferences of people living with dementia (PwD) might help to individualize treatment, care, and support, which could improve patient-related outcomes. This study aimed to summarize preferences of PwD or people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wehrmann, Hannah, Michalowsky, Bernhard, Lepper, Simon, Mohr, Wiebke, Raedke, Anika, Hoffmann, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934309
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S333923
_version_ 1784617618779406336
author Wehrmann, Hannah
Michalowsky, Bernhard
Lepper, Simon
Mohr, Wiebke
Raedke, Anika
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
author_facet Wehrmann, Hannah
Michalowsky, Bernhard
Lepper, Simon
Mohr, Wiebke
Raedke, Anika
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
author_sort Wehrmann, Hannah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the priorities and preferences of people living with dementia (PwD) might help to individualize treatment, care, and support, which could improve patient-related outcomes. This study aimed to summarize preferences of PwD or people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), considering all relevant aspects of health care and everyday life. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review and included studies about patient preferences published in English between January 1, 1990 and October 28, 2019. The inclusion criteria were that preferences were elicited directly by PwD or patients with MCI. We used the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Management value set for dementia to categorize the preferences into the following topics: a) clinical status, b) symptoms, functioning, and quality of life, and c) sustainability of care. RESULTS: Of 578 initially identified studies, 45 met the inclusion criteria. Patients preferred to be informed about the diagnosis as early as possible, especially for anticipatory care planning. They ranked caregiver quality of life as their highest priority. They preferred not to be a burden to others more than their caregivers’ mood, their own functional status, or their own distressing behaviors. Furthermore, PwD are eager to participate in medical decisions, especially in those about creating an everyday life routine. PwD preferred their own quality of life, self-efficacy, and emotional well-being. Institutionalized PwD preferred individualized and person-centered care. According to the sustainability of care, PwD preferred to maintain close bonds with their family at the end of their life and wanted to be treated with empathy. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides essential insights into cognitively impaired patients’ preferences, which are rarely considered in treatment, care, and support services. Further studies should evaluate whether considering preferences in treatment and care or daily living can improve patient-reported outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8684431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86844312021-12-20 Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment – A Systematic Review Wehrmann, Hannah Michalowsky, Bernhard Lepper, Simon Mohr, Wiebke Raedke, Anika Hoffmann, Wolfgang Patient Prefer Adherence Review BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the priorities and preferences of people living with dementia (PwD) might help to individualize treatment, care, and support, which could improve patient-related outcomes. This study aimed to summarize preferences of PwD or people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), considering all relevant aspects of health care and everyday life. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review and included studies about patient preferences published in English between January 1, 1990 and October 28, 2019. The inclusion criteria were that preferences were elicited directly by PwD or patients with MCI. We used the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Management value set for dementia to categorize the preferences into the following topics: a) clinical status, b) symptoms, functioning, and quality of life, and c) sustainability of care. RESULTS: Of 578 initially identified studies, 45 met the inclusion criteria. Patients preferred to be informed about the diagnosis as early as possible, especially for anticipatory care planning. They ranked caregiver quality of life as their highest priority. They preferred not to be a burden to others more than their caregivers’ mood, their own functional status, or their own distressing behaviors. Furthermore, PwD are eager to participate in medical decisions, especially in those about creating an everyday life routine. PwD preferred their own quality of life, self-efficacy, and emotional well-being. Institutionalized PwD preferred individualized and person-centered care. According to the sustainability of care, PwD preferred to maintain close bonds with their family at the end of their life and wanted to be treated with empathy. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides essential insights into cognitively impaired patients’ preferences, which are rarely considered in treatment, care, and support services. Further studies should evaluate whether considering preferences in treatment and care or daily living can improve patient-reported outcomes. Dove 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8684431/ /pubmed/34934309 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S333923 Text en © 2021 Wehrmann et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Wehrmann, Hannah
Michalowsky, Bernhard
Lepper, Simon
Mohr, Wiebke
Raedke, Anika
Hoffmann, Wolfgang
Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment – A Systematic Review
title Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment – A Systematic Review
title_full Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment – A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment – A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment – A Systematic Review
title_short Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment – A Systematic Review
title_sort priorities and preferences of people living with dementia or cognitive impairment – a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934309
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S333923
work_keys_str_mv AT wehrmannhannah prioritiesandpreferencesofpeoplelivingwithdementiaorcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT michalowskybernhard prioritiesandpreferencesofpeoplelivingwithdementiaorcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT leppersimon prioritiesandpreferencesofpeoplelivingwithdementiaorcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT mohrwiebke prioritiesandpreferencesofpeoplelivingwithdementiaorcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT raedkeanika prioritiesandpreferencesofpeoplelivingwithdementiaorcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT hoffmannwolfgang prioritiesandpreferencesofpeoplelivingwithdementiaorcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview