Cargando…

Treatment of Postoperative New Onset Atrial Fibrillation with Repolarization Delaying Agents after Heart Surgery

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the multichannel-blocker dronedarone for postoperative new onset atrial fibrillation (POAF) as compared to amiodarone. Methods: Out of 990 patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery between March 2011 and March 2012, 166 patients who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sipahi, Firat Nihat, Sugimura, Yukiharu, Boeken, Udo, Yilmaz, Esma, Makimoto, Hisaki, Lichtenberg, Artur, Dalyanoĝlu, Hannan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34276001
http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00070
_version_ 1784617703786414080
author Sipahi, Firat Nihat
Sugimura, Yukiharu
Boeken, Udo
Yilmaz, Esma
Makimoto, Hisaki
Lichtenberg, Artur
Dalyanoĝlu, Hannan
author_facet Sipahi, Firat Nihat
Sugimura, Yukiharu
Boeken, Udo
Yilmaz, Esma
Makimoto, Hisaki
Lichtenberg, Artur
Dalyanoĝlu, Hannan
author_sort Sipahi, Firat Nihat
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the multichannel-blocker dronedarone for postoperative new onset atrial fibrillation (POAF) as compared to amiodarone. Methods: Out of 990 patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery between March 2011 and March 2012, 166 patients who developed POAF and treated with amiodarone or dronedarone were enrolled in this study. Results: Eighty-nine patients were treated with amiodarone and 77 patients were treated with dronedarone at discharge. Seventy-five percent of patients with dronedarone were treated initially with intravenous amiodarone but quickly converted to oral dronedarone as soon as the mechanical ventilation was weaned off. The rate of conversion in sinus rhythm was not influenced by the resulting amiodarone-to-dronedarone crossover as compared to oral dronedarone only (p <0.247 at the ICU and p <0.640 at the normal care unit). At hospital discharge sinus rhythm was documented in 44% of the amiodarone patients and 99% of the dronedarone patients (p <0.001). The maintenance of sinus rhythm was demonstrated in 82% of the amiodarone patients versus 81% of the dronedarone patients at 6-month follow-up (p <0.804). Conclusions: Our data demonstrated the higher conversion rate to sinus rhythm in the early phase in the dronedarone group despite a comparable conversion rate in the mid-term phase compared to amiodarone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8684844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86848442021-12-30 Treatment of Postoperative New Onset Atrial Fibrillation with Repolarization Delaying Agents after Heart Surgery Sipahi, Firat Nihat Sugimura, Yukiharu Boeken, Udo Yilmaz, Esma Makimoto, Hisaki Lichtenberg, Artur Dalyanoĝlu, Hannan Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Original Article Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the multichannel-blocker dronedarone for postoperative new onset atrial fibrillation (POAF) as compared to amiodarone. Methods: Out of 990 patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery between March 2011 and March 2012, 166 patients who developed POAF and treated with amiodarone or dronedarone were enrolled in this study. Results: Eighty-nine patients were treated with amiodarone and 77 patients were treated with dronedarone at discharge. Seventy-five percent of patients with dronedarone were treated initially with intravenous amiodarone but quickly converted to oral dronedarone as soon as the mechanical ventilation was weaned off. The rate of conversion in sinus rhythm was not influenced by the resulting amiodarone-to-dronedarone crossover as compared to oral dronedarone only (p <0.247 at the ICU and p <0.640 at the normal care unit). At hospital discharge sinus rhythm was documented in 44% of the amiodarone patients and 99% of the dronedarone patients (p <0.001). The maintenance of sinus rhythm was demonstrated in 82% of the amiodarone patients versus 81% of the dronedarone patients at 6-month follow-up (p <0.804). Conclusions: Our data demonstrated the higher conversion rate to sinus rhythm in the early phase in the dronedarone group despite a comparable conversion rate in the mid-term phase compared to amiodarone. The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2021-07-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8684844/ /pubmed/34276001 http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00070 Text en ©2021 Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NonDerivatives International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Sipahi, Firat Nihat
Sugimura, Yukiharu
Boeken, Udo
Yilmaz, Esma
Makimoto, Hisaki
Lichtenberg, Artur
Dalyanoĝlu, Hannan
Treatment of Postoperative New Onset Atrial Fibrillation with Repolarization Delaying Agents after Heart Surgery
title Treatment of Postoperative New Onset Atrial Fibrillation with Repolarization Delaying Agents after Heart Surgery
title_full Treatment of Postoperative New Onset Atrial Fibrillation with Repolarization Delaying Agents after Heart Surgery
title_fullStr Treatment of Postoperative New Onset Atrial Fibrillation with Repolarization Delaying Agents after Heart Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Postoperative New Onset Atrial Fibrillation with Repolarization Delaying Agents after Heart Surgery
title_short Treatment of Postoperative New Onset Atrial Fibrillation with Repolarization Delaying Agents after Heart Surgery
title_sort treatment of postoperative new onset atrial fibrillation with repolarization delaying agents after heart surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34276001
http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00070
work_keys_str_mv AT sipahifiratnihat treatmentofpostoperativenewonsetatrialfibrillationwithrepolarizationdelayingagentsafterheartsurgery
AT sugimurayukiharu treatmentofpostoperativenewonsetatrialfibrillationwithrepolarizationdelayingagentsafterheartsurgery
AT boekenudo treatmentofpostoperativenewonsetatrialfibrillationwithrepolarizationdelayingagentsafterheartsurgery
AT yilmazesma treatmentofpostoperativenewonsetatrialfibrillationwithrepolarizationdelayingagentsafterheartsurgery
AT makimotohisaki treatmentofpostoperativenewonsetatrialfibrillationwithrepolarizationdelayingagentsafterheartsurgery
AT lichtenbergartur treatmentofpostoperativenewonsetatrialfibrillationwithrepolarizationdelayingagentsafterheartsurgery
AT dalyanogluhannan treatmentofpostoperativenewonsetatrialfibrillationwithrepolarizationdelayingagentsafterheartsurgery