Cargando…

A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical study to evaluate the use of silicone dressings for the treatment of skin tears

One of the most common types of skin breakdown in ageing populations is skin tears. The International Skin Tear Advisory Panel advocates for special attention to be paid to dressing selection related to skin tear management. The panel recommends choosing dressings that will promote the maintenance o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LeBlanc, Kimberly, Woo, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33960667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13604
_version_ 1784617705674899456
author LeBlanc, Kimberly
Woo, Kevin
author_facet LeBlanc, Kimberly
Woo, Kevin
author_sort LeBlanc, Kimberly
collection PubMed
description One of the most common types of skin breakdown in ageing populations is skin tears. The International Skin Tear Advisory Panel advocates for special attention to be paid to dressing selection related to skin tear management. The panel recommends choosing dressings that will promote the maintenance of moisture balance, suit the local wound environment, protect peri‐wound skin, control or manage exudate and infection, and optimise caregiver time. It is paramount that dressings protect the fragile nature of the skin associated with those who at heightened risk for skin tear development. To compare the effectiveness of soft silicone dressings (a contact layer and/or foam) for the healing of skin tears with local practices that do not include soft silicone dressings. The study was a pragmatic randomised controlled prospective study. One hundred and twenty‐six individuals from two long‐term care facilities in Ontario Canada who presented with skin tears were randomised into the treatment group using either soft silicone dressings (a contact layer and/or foam) or the control group using non‐adhesive dressings. The current study demonstrated that 96.9% (n = 63) of skin tears in the treatment group healed over a 3‐week period compared with 34.4% (n = 21) in the control group. The proportion of wound healing experienced at week 2 was 89.2% (n = 58) in the treatment group compared with 27.9% (n = 17) in the control group. There was a significantly greater reduction in wound surface area relative to baseline in the treatment group (2.9 cm(2)) compared with the control group (0.6 cm(2)) (χ (2) = 21.792 P < .0001) at week 1. Survival analysis data supported that skin tears healed 50% faster in the treatment group (11 days) compared with the control group (22 days) (χ (2) = 59.677 P < .0001). The expected healing trajectory of acute wounds, including skin tears, if proper wound bed preparation is realised and infection is controlled, is 7 to 21 days. Results of this study suggest the use of silicone dressings support wound healing and aid in wound closure within the expected healing trajectory, with faster complete wound closure and mean healing times compared with non‐silicone dressing for the treatment of STs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8684852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86848522021-12-30 A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical study to evaluate the use of silicone dressings for the treatment of skin tears LeBlanc, Kimberly Woo, Kevin Int Wound J Original Articles One of the most common types of skin breakdown in ageing populations is skin tears. The International Skin Tear Advisory Panel advocates for special attention to be paid to dressing selection related to skin tear management. The panel recommends choosing dressings that will promote the maintenance of moisture balance, suit the local wound environment, protect peri‐wound skin, control or manage exudate and infection, and optimise caregiver time. It is paramount that dressings protect the fragile nature of the skin associated with those who at heightened risk for skin tear development. To compare the effectiveness of soft silicone dressings (a contact layer and/or foam) for the healing of skin tears with local practices that do not include soft silicone dressings. The study was a pragmatic randomised controlled prospective study. One hundred and twenty‐six individuals from two long‐term care facilities in Ontario Canada who presented with skin tears were randomised into the treatment group using either soft silicone dressings (a contact layer and/or foam) or the control group using non‐adhesive dressings. The current study demonstrated that 96.9% (n = 63) of skin tears in the treatment group healed over a 3‐week period compared with 34.4% (n = 21) in the control group. The proportion of wound healing experienced at week 2 was 89.2% (n = 58) in the treatment group compared with 27.9% (n = 17) in the control group. There was a significantly greater reduction in wound surface area relative to baseline in the treatment group (2.9 cm(2)) compared with the control group (0.6 cm(2)) (χ (2) = 21.792 P < .0001) at week 1. Survival analysis data supported that skin tears healed 50% faster in the treatment group (11 days) compared with the control group (22 days) (χ (2) = 59.677 P < .0001). The expected healing trajectory of acute wounds, including skin tears, if proper wound bed preparation is realised and infection is controlled, is 7 to 21 days. Results of this study suggest the use of silicone dressings support wound healing and aid in wound closure within the expected healing trajectory, with faster complete wound closure and mean healing times compared with non‐silicone dressing for the treatment of STs. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8684852/ /pubmed/33960667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13604 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
LeBlanc, Kimberly
Woo, Kevin
A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical study to evaluate the use of silicone dressings for the treatment of skin tears
title A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical study to evaluate the use of silicone dressings for the treatment of skin tears
title_full A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical study to evaluate the use of silicone dressings for the treatment of skin tears
title_fullStr A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical study to evaluate the use of silicone dressings for the treatment of skin tears
title_full_unstemmed A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical study to evaluate the use of silicone dressings for the treatment of skin tears
title_short A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical study to evaluate the use of silicone dressings for the treatment of skin tears
title_sort pragmatic randomised controlled clinical study to evaluate the use of silicone dressings for the treatment of skin tears
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33960667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13604
work_keys_str_mv AT leblanckimberly apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledclinicalstudytoevaluatetheuseofsiliconedressingsforthetreatmentofskintears
AT wookevin apragmaticrandomisedcontrolledclinicalstudytoevaluatetheuseofsiliconedressingsforthetreatmentofskintears
AT leblanckimberly pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledclinicalstudytoevaluatetheuseofsiliconedressingsforthetreatmentofskintears
AT wookevin pragmaticrandomisedcontrolledclinicalstudytoevaluatetheuseofsiliconedressingsforthetreatmentofskintears