Cargando…

The effect of two different types of forces on possible root resorption in relation to dentin phosphoprotein levels: a single-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this 2-arm-parallel split-mouth trial was to evaluate and compare the extent of possible root resorption using dentin phosphoprotein levels in gingival crevicular fluid between controlled continuous and intermittent orthodontic force groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghaleb, Sherifa, Tamish, Nazla, ElKenany, Walid, Guindi, Myriam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8685187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34927213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00388-y
_version_ 1784617778881232896
author Ghaleb, Sherifa
Tamish, Nazla
ElKenany, Walid
Guindi, Myriam
author_facet Ghaleb, Sherifa
Tamish, Nazla
ElKenany, Walid
Guindi, Myriam
author_sort Ghaleb, Sherifa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this 2-arm-parallel split-mouth trial was to evaluate and compare the extent of possible root resorption using dentin phosphoprotein levels in gingival crevicular fluid between controlled continuous and intermittent orthodontic force groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 16 maxillary first premolars from 8 patients requiring bilateral extractions of the upper first premolars as part of their orthodontic treatment were recruited. A buccally directed continuous force of 150 g, reactivated after 28 days, was applied to the upper first premolar on one side for 8 weeks. On the contralateral first premolar, a buccally directed intermittent force (21 days on, 7 days off) of the same magnitude was applied for the same period. Gingival crevicular fluid samples were collected at the beginning of the study, 1st, 3rd, 4th and 5th week, and at the end of the study to quantify and compare dentin phosphoprotein levels in both groups. RESULTS: Dentin phosphoprotein levels showed a higher concentration in the continuous force group than the intermittent force group in week 4 and 8 of sample collection; where the differences were statistically significant (95% CI 0.007–0.14; P < .04) and (95% CI 0.02–0.17; P < .04) respectively. No harm was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Dentin phosphoprotein was found to be a useful early biomarker to detect and monitor root resorption, showing that the application of an intermittent orthodontic force caused less root resorption than a continuous force. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04825665 ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered 1 April 2021—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04825665.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8685187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86851872022-01-04 The effect of two different types of forces on possible root resorption in relation to dentin phosphoprotein levels: a single-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial Ghaleb, Sherifa Tamish, Nazla ElKenany, Walid Guindi, Myriam Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this 2-arm-parallel split-mouth trial was to evaluate and compare the extent of possible root resorption using dentin phosphoprotein levels in gingival crevicular fluid between controlled continuous and intermittent orthodontic force groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 16 maxillary first premolars from 8 patients requiring bilateral extractions of the upper first premolars as part of their orthodontic treatment were recruited. A buccally directed continuous force of 150 g, reactivated after 28 days, was applied to the upper first premolar on one side for 8 weeks. On the contralateral first premolar, a buccally directed intermittent force (21 days on, 7 days off) of the same magnitude was applied for the same period. Gingival crevicular fluid samples were collected at the beginning of the study, 1st, 3rd, 4th and 5th week, and at the end of the study to quantify and compare dentin phosphoprotein levels in both groups. RESULTS: Dentin phosphoprotein levels showed a higher concentration in the continuous force group than the intermittent force group in week 4 and 8 of sample collection; where the differences were statistically significant (95% CI 0.007–0.14; P < .04) and (95% CI 0.02–0.17; P < .04) respectively. No harm was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Dentin phosphoprotein was found to be a useful early biomarker to detect and monitor root resorption, showing that the application of an intermittent orthodontic force caused less root resorption than a continuous force. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04825665 ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered 1 April 2021—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04825665. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8685187/ /pubmed/34927213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00388-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Ghaleb, Sherifa
Tamish, Nazla
ElKenany, Walid
Guindi, Myriam
The effect of two different types of forces on possible root resorption in relation to dentin phosphoprotein levels: a single-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial
title The effect of two different types of forces on possible root resorption in relation to dentin phosphoprotein levels: a single-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial
title_full The effect of two different types of forces on possible root resorption in relation to dentin phosphoprotein levels: a single-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effect of two different types of forces on possible root resorption in relation to dentin phosphoprotein levels: a single-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of two different types of forces on possible root resorption in relation to dentin phosphoprotein levels: a single-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial
title_short The effect of two different types of forces on possible root resorption in relation to dentin phosphoprotein levels: a single-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of two different types of forces on possible root resorption in relation to dentin phosphoprotein levels: a single-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8685187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34927213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00388-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ghalebsherifa theeffectoftwodifferenttypesofforcesonpossiblerootresorptioninrelationtodentinphosphoproteinlevelsasingleblindsplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tamishnazla theeffectoftwodifferenttypesofforcesonpossiblerootresorptioninrelationtodentinphosphoproteinlevelsasingleblindsplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elkenanywalid theeffectoftwodifferenttypesofforcesonpossiblerootresorptioninrelationtodentinphosphoproteinlevelsasingleblindsplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guindimyriam theeffectoftwodifferenttypesofforcesonpossiblerootresorptioninrelationtodentinphosphoproteinlevelsasingleblindsplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ghalebsherifa effectoftwodifferenttypesofforcesonpossiblerootresorptioninrelationtodentinphosphoproteinlevelsasingleblindsplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tamishnazla effectoftwodifferenttypesofforcesonpossiblerootresorptioninrelationtodentinphosphoproteinlevelsasingleblindsplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elkenanywalid effectoftwodifferenttypesofforcesonpossiblerootresorptioninrelationtodentinphosphoproteinlevelsasingleblindsplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guindimyriam effectoftwodifferenttypesofforcesonpossiblerootresorptioninrelationtodentinphosphoproteinlevelsasingleblindsplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledtrial