Cargando…

Effects of Donepezil and Medroxyprogesterone Versus Placebo on Weaning in Adult Patients With Non-Pulmonary Etiologies Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A triple‐blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Medroxyprogesterone and donepezil could be used as respiratory stimulants in ventilated patients. However, no randomized placebo-controlled trial is available to confirm this approach and compare these drugs. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of donepezil or medrox...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alizadeh, Zahra, Sahebnasagh, Adeleh, Hadadzadegan, Navid, Mohammadi, Farhad, Saghafi, Fatemeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8685376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.735594
_version_ 1784617821477535744
author Alizadeh, Zahra
Sahebnasagh, Adeleh
Hadadzadegan, Navid
Mohammadi, Farhad
Saghafi, Fatemeh
author_facet Alizadeh, Zahra
Sahebnasagh, Adeleh
Hadadzadegan, Navid
Mohammadi, Farhad
Saghafi, Fatemeh
author_sort Alizadeh, Zahra
collection PubMed
description Background: Medroxyprogesterone and donepezil could be used as respiratory stimulants in ventilated patients. However, no randomized placebo-controlled trial is available to confirm this approach and compare these drugs. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of donepezil or medroxyprogesterone compared to the placebo in improvement in respiratory status and weaning facilitation in critically ill adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Material and Methods: This randomized, triple-blind trial was conducted on 78 ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICU). Patients who were intubated due to pulmonary disorders were ruled out. Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 5 mg donepezil (n = 23) or 5 mg medroxyprogesterone (n = 26), or placebo (n = 24) twice a day until weaning (maximum 10 days). The primary endpoints were weaning duration, and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation. Secondary endpoints included rate of successful weaning, changes in arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters, GCS and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, hemoglobin (Hgb), ICU-mortality, and duration of ICU stay, were measured before and after the intervention and if successful weaning was recorded. Results: Of 78 studied patients who were randomized, 59 weaned successfully. 87% patients in donepezil and 88.5% patients in medroxyprogesterone groups were successfully weaned compared to 66.7% patients in the placebo group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p-Value = 0.111). Changes in pH, mean duration of intubation, and weaning duration were statistically different in donepezil compared with the control group (p-Value < 0.05). No significant difference in ABG, Hgb, GCS and SOFA score, and duration of intubation were seen in the medroxyprogesterone group, but weaning duration was significantly reduced to 1.429 days compared with the control group (p-Value = 0.038). Conclusion: The results of this clinical trial have demonstrated that the administered dose of medroxyprogesterone and donepezil can expedite the weaning process by reducing the weaning duration compared to placebo. Furthermore, the total duration of invasive ventilation was significantly lower in the donepezil group compared to the control group. Future clinical trials with a larger sample size will determine the exact role of medroxyprogesterone and donepezil in mechanically ventilated patients. Clinical Trial Registration: https://irct.ir/IRCT20190810044500N2 (April 1, 2020).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8685376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86853762021-12-21 Effects of Donepezil and Medroxyprogesterone Versus Placebo on Weaning in Adult Patients With Non-Pulmonary Etiologies Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A triple‐blind Randomized Clinical Trial Alizadeh, Zahra Sahebnasagh, Adeleh Hadadzadegan, Navid Mohammadi, Farhad Saghafi, Fatemeh Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Medroxyprogesterone and donepezil could be used as respiratory stimulants in ventilated patients. However, no randomized placebo-controlled trial is available to confirm this approach and compare these drugs. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of donepezil or medroxyprogesterone compared to the placebo in improvement in respiratory status and weaning facilitation in critically ill adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Material and Methods: This randomized, triple-blind trial was conducted on 78 ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICU). Patients who were intubated due to pulmonary disorders were ruled out. Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 5 mg donepezil (n = 23) or 5 mg medroxyprogesterone (n = 26), or placebo (n = 24) twice a day until weaning (maximum 10 days). The primary endpoints were weaning duration, and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation. Secondary endpoints included rate of successful weaning, changes in arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters, GCS and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, hemoglobin (Hgb), ICU-mortality, and duration of ICU stay, were measured before and after the intervention and if successful weaning was recorded. Results: Of 78 studied patients who were randomized, 59 weaned successfully. 87% patients in donepezil and 88.5% patients in medroxyprogesterone groups were successfully weaned compared to 66.7% patients in the placebo group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p-Value = 0.111). Changes in pH, mean duration of intubation, and weaning duration were statistically different in donepezil compared with the control group (p-Value < 0.05). No significant difference in ABG, Hgb, GCS and SOFA score, and duration of intubation were seen in the medroxyprogesterone group, but weaning duration was significantly reduced to 1.429 days compared with the control group (p-Value = 0.038). Conclusion: The results of this clinical trial have demonstrated that the administered dose of medroxyprogesterone and donepezil can expedite the weaning process by reducing the weaning duration compared to placebo. Furthermore, the total duration of invasive ventilation was significantly lower in the donepezil group compared to the control group. Future clinical trials with a larger sample size will determine the exact role of medroxyprogesterone and donepezil in mechanically ventilated patients. Clinical Trial Registration: https://irct.ir/IRCT20190810044500N2 (April 1, 2020). Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8685376/ /pubmed/34938176 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.735594 Text en Copyright © 2021 Alizadeh, Sahebnasagh, Hadadzadegan, Mohammadi and Saghafi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Alizadeh, Zahra
Sahebnasagh, Adeleh
Hadadzadegan, Navid
Mohammadi, Farhad
Saghafi, Fatemeh
Effects of Donepezil and Medroxyprogesterone Versus Placebo on Weaning in Adult Patients With Non-Pulmonary Etiologies Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A triple‐blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title Effects of Donepezil and Medroxyprogesterone Versus Placebo on Weaning in Adult Patients With Non-Pulmonary Etiologies Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A triple‐blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Effects of Donepezil and Medroxyprogesterone Versus Placebo on Weaning in Adult Patients With Non-Pulmonary Etiologies Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A triple‐blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Effects of Donepezil and Medroxyprogesterone Versus Placebo on Weaning in Adult Patients With Non-Pulmonary Etiologies Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A triple‐blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Donepezil and Medroxyprogesterone Versus Placebo on Weaning in Adult Patients With Non-Pulmonary Etiologies Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A triple‐blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Effects of Donepezil and Medroxyprogesterone Versus Placebo on Weaning in Adult Patients With Non-Pulmonary Etiologies Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A triple‐blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort effects of donepezil and medroxyprogesterone versus placebo on weaning in adult patients with non-pulmonary etiologies receiving invasive mechanical ventilation: a triple‐blind randomized clinical trial
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8685376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.735594
work_keys_str_mv AT alizadehzahra effectsofdonepezilandmedroxyprogesteroneversusplaceboonweaninginadultpatientswithnonpulmonaryetiologiesreceivinginvasivemechanicalventilationatripleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sahebnasaghadeleh effectsofdonepezilandmedroxyprogesteroneversusplaceboonweaninginadultpatientswithnonpulmonaryetiologiesreceivinginvasivemechanicalventilationatripleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hadadzadegannavid effectsofdonepezilandmedroxyprogesteroneversusplaceboonweaninginadultpatientswithnonpulmonaryetiologiesreceivinginvasivemechanicalventilationatripleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mohammadifarhad effectsofdonepezilandmedroxyprogesteroneversusplaceboonweaninginadultpatientswithnonpulmonaryetiologiesreceivinginvasivemechanicalventilationatripleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT saghafifatemeh effectsofdonepezilandmedroxyprogesteroneversusplaceboonweaninginadultpatientswithnonpulmonaryetiologiesreceivinginvasivemechanicalventilationatripleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial