Cargando…

Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?

BACKGROUND: Children who have been critically ill face long-term developmental impairments. Iatrogenic exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), a plasticizer leaching from plastic indwelling medical devices used in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), has been associated with the pronounce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanhorebeek, Ilse, Malarvannan, Govindan, Güiza, Fabian, Poma, Giulia, Derese, Inge, Wouters, Pieter J., Joosten, Koen, Verbruggen, Sascha, Jorens, Philippe G., Covaci, Adrian, Van den Berghe, Greet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8685605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34739923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106962
_version_ 1784617864700887040
author Vanhorebeek, Ilse
Malarvannan, Govindan
Güiza, Fabian
Poma, Giulia
Derese, Inge
Wouters, Pieter J.
Joosten, Koen
Verbruggen, Sascha
Jorens, Philippe G.
Covaci, Adrian
Van den Berghe, Greet
author_facet Vanhorebeek, Ilse
Malarvannan, Govindan
Güiza, Fabian
Poma, Giulia
Derese, Inge
Wouters, Pieter J.
Joosten, Koen
Verbruggen, Sascha
Jorens, Philippe G.
Covaci, Adrian
Van den Berghe, Greet
author_sort Vanhorebeek, Ilse
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Children who have been critically ill face long-term developmental impairments. Iatrogenic exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), a plasticizer leaching from plastic indwelling medical devices used in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), has been associated with the pronounced attention deficit observed in children 4 years after critical illness. As concerns about DEHP toxicity increased, governmental authorities urged the phase out of DEHP in indwelling medical devices and replacement with alternative plasticizers. We hypothesized that exposure to DEHP decreased over the years, attenuating the pronounced long-term attention deficit of these vulnerable children. METHODS: We compared plasma concentrations of 3 oxidative DEHP metabolites (5cx-MEPP, 5OH-MEHP, 5oxo-MEHP) on the last PICU day in 216 patients who participated in the Tight Glucose Control study (2004–2007) and 334 patients who participated in the PEPaNIC study (2012–2015) and survived PICU stay. Corresponding minimal exposures to these metabolites (plasma concentration multiplied with number of days in PICU) were also evaluated. In patients with 4-year follow-up data, we compared measures of attention (standardized reaction times and consistency). Comparisons were performed with univariable analyses and multivariable linear regression analyses adjusted for baseline risk factors. RESULTS: In the PEPaNIC patients, last PICU day plasma concentrations of 5cx-MEPP, 5OH-MEHP, 5oxo-MEHP and their sum, and corresponding minimal exposures, were reduced to 17–69% of those in the Tight Glucose Control study (p < 0.0001). Differences remained significant after multivariable adjustment (p ≤ 0.001). PEPaNIC patients did not show better attention than patients in the Tight Glucose Control study, also not after multivariable adjustment for risk factors. CONCLUSION: Exposure of critically ill children to DEHP in the PICU decreased over the years, but the lower exposure did not translate into improved attention 4 years later. Whether the residual exposure may still be toxic or whether the plasticizers replacing DEHP may not be safe for neurodevelopment needs further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8685605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86856052022-01-01 Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children? Vanhorebeek, Ilse Malarvannan, Govindan Güiza, Fabian Poma, Giulia Derese, Inge Wouters, Pieter J. Joosten, Koen Verbruggen, Sascha Jorens, Philippe G. Covaci, Adrian Van den Berghe, Greet Environ Int Article BACKGROUND: Children who have been critically ill face long-term developmental impairments. Iatrogenic exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), a plasticizer leaching from plastic indwelling medical devices used in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), has been associated with the pronounced attention deficit observed in children 4 years after critical illness. As concerns about DEHP toxicity increased, governmental authorities urged the phase out of DEHP in indwelling medical devices and replacement with alternative plasticizers. We hypothesized that exposure to DEHP decreased over the years, attenuating the pronounced long-term attention deficit of these vulnerable children. METHODS: We compared plasma concentrations of 3 oxidative DEHP metabolites (5cx-MEPP, 5OH-MEHP, 5oxo-MEHP) on the last PICU day in 216 patients who participated in the Tight Glucose Control study (2004–2007) and 334 patients who participated in the PEPaNIC study (2012–2015) and survived PICU stay. Corresponding minimal exposures to these metabolites (plasma concentration multiplied with number of days in PICU) were also evaluated. In patients with 4-year follow-up data, we compared measures of attention (standardized reaction times and consistency). Comparisons were performed with univariable analyses and multivariable linear regression analyses adjusted for baseline risk factors. RESULTS: In the PEPaNIC patients, last PICU day plasma concentrations of 5cx-MEPP, 5OH-MEHP, 5oxo-MEHP and their sum, and corresponding minimal exposures, were reduced to 17–69% of those in the Tight Glucose Control study (p < 0.0001). Differences remained significant after multivariable adjustment (p ≤ 0.001). PEPaNIC patients did not show better attention than patients in the Tight Glucose Control study, also not after multivariable adjustment for risk factors. CONCLUSION: Exposure of critically ill children to DEHP in the PICU decreased over the years, but the lower exposure did not translate into improved attention 4 years later. Whether the residual exposure may still be toxic or whether the plasticizers replacing DEHP may not be safe for neurodevelopment needs further investigation. Elsevier Science 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8685605/ /pubmed/34739923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106962 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vanhorebeek, Ilse
Malarvannan, Govindan
Güiza, Fabian
Poma, Giulia
Derese, Inge
Wouters, Pieter J.
Joosten, Koen
Verbruggen, Sascha
Jorens, Philippe G.
Covaci, Adrian
Van den Berghe, Greet
Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
title Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
title_full Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
title_fullStr Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
title_full_unstemmed Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
title_short Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
title_sort phasing out dehp from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8685605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34739923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106962
work_keys_str_mv AT vanhorebeekilse phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT malarvannangovindan phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT guizafabian phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT pomagiulia phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT dereseinge phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT wouterspieterj phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT joostenkoen phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT verbruggensascha phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT jorensphilippeg phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT covaciadrian phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT vandenberghegreet phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren