Cargando…

Global infectious disease risks associated with occupational exposure among non-healthcare workers: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVES: Employees in non-healthcare occupations may be in several ways exposed to infectious agents. Improved knowledge about the risks is needed to identify opportunities to prevent work-related infectious diseases. The objective of the current study was to provide an updated overview of the pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Acke, Sofie, Couvreur, Simon, Bramer, Wichor M, Schmickler, Marie-Noëlle, De Schryver, Antoon, Haagsma, Juanita A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8685622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-107164
_version_ 1784617868576423936
author Acke, Sofie
Couvreur, Simon
Bramer, Wichor M
Schmickler, Marie-Noëlle
De Schryver, Antoon
Haagsma, Juanita A
author_facet Acke, Sofie
Couvreur, Simon
Bramer, Wichor M
Schmickler, Marie-Noëlle
De Schryver, Antoon
Haagsma, Juanita A
author_sort Acke, Sofie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Employees in non-healthcare occupations may be in several ways exposed to infectious agents. Improved knowledge about the risks is needed to identify opportunities to prevent work-related infectious diseases. The objective of the current study was to provide an updated overview of the published evidence on the exposure to pathogens among non-healthcare workers. Because of the recent SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, we also aimed to gain more evidence about exposure to several respiratory tract pathogens. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified in MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane between 2009 and 8 December 2020. The protocol was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42019107265). An additional quality assessment was applied according to the Equator network guidelines. RESULTS: The systematic literature search yielded 4620 papers of which 270 met the selection and quality criteria. Infectious disease risks were described in 37 occupational groups; 18 of them were not mentioned before. Armed forces (n=36 pathogens), livestock farm labourers (n=31), livestock/dairy producers (n=26), abattoir workers (n=22); animal carers and forestry workers (both n=16) seemed to have the highest risk. In total, 111 pathogen exposures were found. Many of these occupational groups (81.1%) were exposed to respiratory tract pathogens. CONCLUSION: Many of these respiratory tract pathogens were readily transmitted where employees congregate (workplace risk factors), while worker risk factors seemed to be of increasing importance. By analysing existing knowledge of these risk factors, identifying new risks and susceptible risk groups, this review aimed to raise awareness of the issue and provide reliable information to establish more effective preventive measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8685622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86856222022-01-04 Global infectious disease risks associated with occupational exposure among non-healthcare workers: a systematic review of the literature Acke, Sofie Couvreur, Simon Bramer, Wichor M Schmickler, Marie-Noëlle De Schryver, Antoon Haagsma, Juanita A Occup Environ Med Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: Employees in non-healthcare occupations may be in several ways exposed to infectious agents. Improved knowledge about the risks is needed to identify opportunities to prevent work-related infectious diseases. The objective of the current study was to provide an updated overview of the published evidence on the exposure to pathogens among non-healthcare workers. Because of the recent SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, we also aimed to gain more evidence about exposure to several respiratory tract pathogens. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified in MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane between 2009 and 8 December 2020. The protocol was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42019107265). An additional quality assessment was applied according to the Equator network guidelines. RESULTS: The systematic literature search yielded 4620 papers of which 270 met the selection and quality criteria. Infectious disease risks were described in 37 occupational groups; 18 of them were not mentioned before. Armed forces (n=36 pathogens), livestock farm labourers (n=31), livestock/dairy producers (n=26), abattoir workers (n=22); animal carers and forestry workers (both n=16) seemed to have the highest risk. In total, 111 pathogen exposures were found. Many of these occupational groups (81.1%) were exposed to respiratory tract pathogens. CONCLUSION: Many of these respiratory tract pathogens were readily transmitted where employees congregate (workplace risk factors), while worker risk factors seemed to be of increasing importance. By analysing existing knowledge of these risk factors, identifying new risks and susceptible risk groups, this review aimed to raise awareness of the issue and provide reliable information to establish more effective preventive measures. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8685622/ /pubmed/34035182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-107164 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Acke, Sofie
Couvreur, Simon
Bramer, Wichor M
Schmickler, Marie-Noëlle
De Schryver, Antoon
Haagsma, Juanita A
Global infectious disease risks associated with occupational exposure among non-healthcare workers: a systematic review of the literature
title Global infectious disease risks associated with occupational exposure among non-healthcare workers: a systematic review of the literature
title_full Global infectious disease risks associated with occupational exposure among non-healthcare workers: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Global infectious disease risks associated with occupational exposure among non-healthcare workers: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Global infectious disease risks associated with occupational exposure among non-healthcare workers: a systematic review of the literature
title_short Global infectious disease risks associated with occupational exposure among non-healthcare workers: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort global infectious disease risks associated with occupational exposure among non-healthcare workers: a systematic review of the literature
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8685622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-107164
work_keys_str_mv AT ackesofie globalinfectiousdiseaserisksassociatedwithoccupationalexposureamongnonhealthcareworkersasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT couvreursimon globalinfectiousdiseaserisksassociatedwithoccupationalexposureamongnonhealthcareworkersasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT bramerwichorm globalinfectiousdiseaserisksassociatedwithoccupationalexposureamongnonhealthcareworkersasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT schmicklermarienoelle globalinfectiousdiseaserisksassociatedwithoccupationalexposureamongnonhealthcareworkersasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT deschryverantoon globalinfectiousdiseaserisksassociatedwithoccupationalexposureamongnonhealthcareworkersasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT haagsmajuanitaa globalinfectiousdiseaserisksassociatedwithoccupationalexposureamongnonhealthcareworkersasystematicreviewoftheliterature