Cargando…
Blunt duct adenosis: a separate entity from columnar cell lesions?
Blunt duct adenosis (BDA) is a breast lesion first described by Foote and Stewart in 1945 as a proliferative benign lesion of the terminal duct lobular unit. Throughout recent decades, further literature descriptions of BDA have been confusing. Some consider BDA to be a separate entity, some a growt...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8685639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33858936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-207359 |
_version_ | 1784617872377511936 |
---|---|
author | de Boer, Mirthe van Diest, Paul J |
author_facet | de Boer, Mirthe van Diest, Paul J |
author_sort | de Boer, Mirthe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Blunt duct adenosis (BDA) is a breast lesion first described by Foote and Stewart in 1945 as a proliferative benign lesion of the terminal duct lobular unit. Throughout recent decades, further literature descriptions of BDA have been confusing. Some consider BDA to be a separate entity, some a growth pattern of columnar cell changes. The WHO 2012 considered BDA and columnar cell changes to be synonyms, while columnar cell lesions, especially those with atypia, are part of a spectrum of early precursors of the low nuclear grade breast neoplasia family. In the updated WHO 2019 version, BDA is mentioned as ‘not recommended’ terminology for columnar cell lesions without further discussing it, leaving the question open if BDA should be considered a separate entity. Good diagnostic criteria for BDA have however largely been lacking, and its biological background has not yet been unravelled. In this paper, we point out that BDA is mainly associated with benign breast lesions and not with other recognised precursor lesions. Further, 16q loss, which is the hallmark molecular event in the low nuclear grade breast neoplasia family, is lacking in BDA. We therefore hypothesise that BDA may not be a true precursor lesion but a benign polyclonal lesion, and propose morphological diagnostic criteria to better differentiate it from columnar cell lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8685639 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86856392022-01-04 Blunt duct adenosis: a separate entity from columnar cell lesions? de Boer, Mirthe van Diest, Paul J J Clin Pathol Review Blunt duct adenosis (BDA) is a breast lesion first described by Foote and Stewart in 1945 as a proliferative benign lesion of the terminal duct lobular unit. Throughout recent decades, further literature descriptions of BDA have been confusing. Some consider BDA to be a separate entity, some a growth pattern of columnar cell changes. The WHO 2012 considered BDA and columnar cell changes to be synonyms, while columnar cell lesions, especially those with atypia, are part of a spectrum of early precursors of the low nuclear grade breast neoplasia family. In the updated WHO 2019 version, BDA is mentioned as ‘not recommended’ terminology for columnar cell lesions without further discussing it, leaving the question open if BDA should be considered a separate entity. Good diagnostic criteria for BDA have however largely been lacking, and its biological background has not yet been unravelled. In this paper, we point out that BDA is mainly associated with benign breast lesions and not with other recognised precursor lesions. Further, 16q loss, which is the hallmark molecular event in the low nuclear grade breast neoplasia family, is lacking in BDA. We therefore hypothesise that BDA may not be a true precursor lesion but a benign polyclonal lesion, and propose morphological diagnostic criteria to better differentiate it from columnar cell lesions. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01 2021-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8685639/ /pubmed/33858936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-207359 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review de Boer, Mirthe van Diest, Paul J Blunt duct adenosis: a separate entity from columnar cell lesions? |
title | Blunt duct adenosis: a separate entity from columnar cell lesions? |
title_full | Blunt duct adenosis: a separate entity from columnar cell lesions? |
title_fullStr | Blunt duct adenosis: a separate entity from columnar cell lesions? |
title_full_unstemmed | Blunt duct adenosis: a separate entity from columnar cell lesions? |
title_short | Blunt duct adenosis: a separate entity from columnar cell lesions? |
title_sort | blunt duct adenosis: a separate entity from columnar cell lesions? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8685639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33858936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-207359 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deboermirthe bluntductadenosisaseparateentityfromcolumnarcelllesions AT vandiestpaulj bluntductadenosisaseparateentityfromcolumnarcelllesions |