Cargando…

Methodologies for energy evaluation of pig and poultry feeds: A review

The cost of feed represents an important part of the total cost in swine and poultry production (>60%) with energy accounting for at least 70% of feed cost. The energy value of ingredients or compound feeds can be estimated as digestible (DE), metabolisable (ME) and net energy (NE) in pigs and ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noblet, Jean, Wu, Shu-Biao, Choct, Mingan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: KeAi Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8685914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.06.015
_version_ 1784617916890611712
author Noblet, Jean
Wu, Shu-Biao
Choct, Mingan
author_facet Noblet, Jean
Wu, Shu-Biao
Choct, Mingan
author_sort Noblet, Jean
collection PubMed
description The cost of feed represents an important part of the total cost in swine and poultry production (>60%) with energy accounting for at least 70% of feed cost. The energy value of ingredients or compound feeds can be estimated as digestible (DE), metabolisable (ME) and net energy (NE) in pigs and ME and NE in poultry. The current paper reviews the different methods for evaluating DE, ME and NE of feeds for monogastric animals and their difficulties and limits, with a focus on NE. In pigs and poultry, energy digestibility depends on the chemical characteristics of the feed, but also on technology (pelleting, for instance) and animal factors such as their health and body weight. The ME value includes the energy losses in urine that are directly dependent on the proportion of dietary N excreted in urine resulting in the concept of ME adjusted for a zero N balance (MEn) in poultry. For poultry, the concept of true ME (TME, TMEn), which excludes the endogenous fecal and urinary energy losses from the excreta energy, was also developed. The measurement of dietary NE is more complex, and NE values of a given feed depend on the animal and environmental factors and also measurement and calculation methods. The combination of NE values of diets obtained under standardised conditions allows calculating NE prediction equations that are applicable to both ingredients and compound feeds. The abundance of energy concepts, especially for poultry, and the numerous feed and animal factors of variation related to energy digestibility or ME utilisation for NE suggest that attention must be paid to the experimental conditions for evaluating DE, ME or NE content. This also suggests the necessity of standardisations, one of them being, as implemented in pigs, an adjustment of ME values in poultry for an N retention representative of modern production conditions (MEs). In conclusion, this review illustrates that, in addition to numerous technical difficulties for evaluating energy in pigs and poultry, the absolute energy values depend on feed and animal factors, the environment, and the methods and concepts. Finally, as implemented in pigs, the use of NE values should be the objective of a more reliable energy system for poultry feeds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8685914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher KeAi Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86859142021-12-30 Methodologies for energy evaluation of pig and poultry feeds: A review Noblet, Jean Wu, Shu-Biao Choct, Mingan Anim Nutr Review Article The cost of feed represents an important part of the total cost in swine and poultry production (>60%) with energy accounting for at least 70% of feed cost. The energy value of ingredients or compound feeds can be estimated as digestible (DE), metabolisable (ME) and net energy (NE) in pigs and ME and NE in poultry. The current paper reviews the different methods for evaluating DE, ME and NE of feeds for monogastric animals and their difficulties and limits, with a focus on NE. In pigs and poultry, energy digestibility depends on the chemical characteristics of the feed, but also on technology (pelleting, for instance) and animal factors such as their health and body weight. The ME value includes the energy losses in urine that are directly dependent on the proportion of dietary N excreted in urine resulting in the concept of ME adjusted for a zero N balance (MEn) in poultry. For poultry, the concept of true ME (TME, TMEn), which excludes the endogenous fecal and urinary energy losses from the excreta energy, was also developed. The measurement of dietary NE is more complex, and NE values of a given feed depend on the animal and environmental factors and also measurement and calculation methods. The combination of NE values of diets obtained under standardised conditions allows calculating NE prediction equations that are applicable to both ingredients and compound feeds. The abundance of energy concepts, especially for poultry, and the numerous feed and animal factors of variation related to energy digestibility or ME utilisation for NE suggest that attention must be paid to the experimental conditions for evaluating DE, ME or NE content. This also suggests the necessity of standardisations, one of them being, as implemented in pigs, an adjustment of ME values in poultry for an N retention representative of modern production conditions (MEs). In conclusion, this review illustrates that, in addition to numerous technical difficulties for evaluating energy in pigs and poultry, the absolute energy values depend on feed and animal factors, the environment, and the methods and concepts. Finally, as implemented in pigs, the use of NE values should be the objective of a more reliable energy system for poultry feeds. KeAi Publishing 2021-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8685914/ /pubmed/34977388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.06.015 Text en © 2021 Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Noblet, Jean
Wu, Shu-Biao
Choct, Mingan
Methodologies for energy evaluation of pig and poultry feeds: A review
title Methodologies for energy evaluation of pig and poultry feeds: A review
title_full Methodologies for energy evaluation of pig and poultry feeds: A review
title_fullStr Methodologies for energy evaluation of pig and poultry feeds: A review
title_full_unstemmed Methodologies for energy evaluation of pig and poultry feeds: A review
title_short Methodologies for energy evaluation of pig and poultry feeds: A review
title_sort methodologies for energy evaluation of pig and poultry feeds: a review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8685914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.06.015
work_keys_str_mv AT nobletjean methodologiesforenergyevaluationofpigandpoultryfeedsareview
AT wushubiao methodologiesforenergyevaluationofpigandpoultryfeedsareview
AT choctmingan methodologiesforenergyevaluationofpigandpoultryfeedsareview