Cargando…

An artificial neural-network approach to identify motor hotspot for upper-limb based on electroencephalography: a proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND: To apply transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) to the motor cortex, motor hotspots are generally identified using motor evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The objective of this study is to validate the feasibility of a novel electroencephalography (EEG)-bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Ga-Young, Han, Chang-Hee, Lee, Hyung-Tak, Paik, Nam-Jong, Kim, Won-Seok, Hwang, Han-Jeong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8686235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00972-7
_version_ 1784617975374938112
author Choi, Ga-Young
Han, Chang-Hee
Lee, Hyung-Tak
Paik, Nam-Jong
Kim, Won-Seok
Hwang, Han-Jeong
author_facet Choi, Ga-Young
Han, Chang-Hee
Lee, Hyung-Tak
Paik, Nam-Jong
Kim, Won-Seok
Hwang, Han-Jeong
author_sort Choi, Ga-Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To apply transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) to the motor cortex, motor hotspots are generally identified using motor evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The objective of this study is to validate the feasibility of a novel electroencephalography (EEG)-based motor-hotspot-identification approach using a machine learning technique as a potential alternative to TMS. METHODS: EEG data were measured using 63 channels from thirty subjects as they performed a simple finger tapping task. Power spectral densities of the EEG data were extracted from six frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma, and full) and were independently used to train and test an artificial neural network for motor hotspot identification. The 3D coordinate information of individual motor hotspots identified by TMS were quantitatively compared with those estimated by our EEG-based motor-hotspot-identification approach to assess its feasibility. RESULTS: The minimum mean error distance between the motor hotspot locations identified by TMS and our proposed motor-hotspot-identification approach was 0.22 ± 0.03 cm, demonstrating the proof-of-concept of our proposed EEG-based approach. A mean error distance of 1.32 ± 0.15 cm was measured when using only nine channels attached to the middle of the motor cortex, showing the possibility of practically using the proposed motor-hotspot-identification approach based on a relatively small number of EEG channels. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of our novel EEG-based motor-hotspot-identification method. It is expected that our approach can be used as an alternative to TMS for motor hotspot identification. In particular, its usability would significantly increase when using a recently developed portable tES device integrated with an EEG device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8686235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86862352021-12-20 An artificial neural-network approach to identify motor hotspot for upper-limb based on electroencephalography: a proof-of-concept study Choi, Ga-Young Han, Chang-Hee Lee, Hyung-Tak Paik, Nam-Jong Kim, Won-Seok Hwang, Han-Jeong J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: To apply transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) to the motor cortex, motor hotspots are generally identified using motor evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The objective of this study is to validate the feasibility of a novel electroencephalography (EEG)-based motor-hotspot-identification approach using a machine learning technique as a potential alternative to TMS. METHODS: EEG data were measured using 63 channels from thirty subjects as they performed a simple finger tapping task. Power spectral densities of the EEG data were extracted from six frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma, and full) and were independently used to train and test an artificial neural network for motor hotspot identification. The 3D coordinate information of individual motor hotspots identified by TMS were quantitatively compared with those estimated by our EEG-based motor-hotspot-identification approach to assess its feasibility. RESULTS: The minimum mean error distance between the motor hotspot locations identified by TMS and our proposed motor-hotspot-identification approach was 0.22 ± 0.03 cm, demonstrating the proof-of-concept of our proposed EEG-based approach. A mean error distance of 1.32 ± 0.15 cm was measured when using only nine channels attached to the middle of the motor cortex, showing the possibility of practically using the proposed motor-hotspot-identification approach based on a relatively small number of EEG channels. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of our novel EEG-based motor-hotspot-identification method. It is expected that our approach can be used as an alternative to TMS for motor hotspot identification. In particular, its usability would significantly increase when using a recently developed portable tES device integrated with an EEG device. BioMed Central 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8686235/ /pubmed/34930380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00972-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Choi, Ga-Young
Han, Chang-Hee
Lee, Hyung-Tak
Paik, Nam-Jong
Kim, Won-Seok
Hwang, Han-Jeong
An artificial neural-network approach to identify motor hotspot for upper-limb based on electroencephalography: a proof-of-concept study
title An artificial neural-network approach to identify motor hotspot for upper-limb based on electroencephalography: a proof-of-concept study
title_full An artificial neural-network approach to identify motor hotspot for upper-limb based on electroencephalography: a proof-of-concept study
title_fullStr An artificial neural-network approach to identify motor hotspot for upper-limb based on electroencephalography: a proof-of-concept study
title_full_unstemmed An artificial neural-network approach to identify motor hotspot for upper-limb based on electroencephalography: a proof-of-concept study
title_short An artificial neural-network approach to identify motor hotspot for upper-limb based on electroencephalography: a proof-of-concept study
title_sort artificial neural-network approach to identify motor hotspot for upper-limb based on electroencephalography: a proof-of-concept study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8686235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00972-7
work_keys_str_mv AT choigayoung anartificialneuralnetworkapproachtoidentifymotorhotspotforupperlimbbasedonelectroencephalographyaproofofconceptstudy
AT hanchanghee anartificialneuralnetworkapproachtoidentifymotorhotspotforupperlimbbasedonelectroencephalographyaproofofconceptstudy
AT leehyungtak anartificialneuralnetworkapproachtoidentifymotorhotspotforupperlimbbasedonelectroencephalographyaproofofconceptstudy
AT paiknamjong anartificialneuralnetworkapproachtoidentifymotorhotspotforupperlimbbasedonelectroencephalographyaproofofconceptstudy
AT kimwonseok anartificialneuralnetworkapproachtoidentifymotorhotspotforupperlimbbasedonelectroencephalographyaproofofconceptstudy
AT hwanghanjeong anartificialneuralnetworkapproachtoidentifymotorhotspotforupperlimbbasedonelectroencephalographyaproofofconceptstudy
AT choigayoung artificialneuralnetworkapproachtoidentifymotorhotspotforupperlimbbasedonelectroencephalographyaproofofconceptstudy
AT hanchanghee artificialneuralnetworkapproachtoidentifymotorhotspotforupperlimbbasedonelectroencephalographyaproofofconceptstudy
AT leehyungtak artificialneuralnetworkapproachtoidentifymotorhotspotforupperlimbbasedonelectroencephalographyaproofofconceptstudy
AT paiknamjong artificialneuralnetworkapproachtoidentifymotorhotspotforupperlimbbasedonelectroencephalographyaproofofconceptstudy
AT kimwonseok artificialneuralnetworkapproachtoidentifymotorhotspotforupperlimbbasedonelectroencephalographyaproofofconceptstudy
AT hwanghanjeong artificialneuralnetworkapproachtoidentifymotorhotspotforupperlimbbasedonelectroencephalographyaproofofconceptstudy