Cargando…

Three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: safety propensity score analysis on 166 head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Radio-chemotherapy with CDDP is the standard for H&N squamous cell cancer. CDDP 100 mg/m(2)/q3 is the standard; alternative schedules are used to reduce toxicity, mostly 40 mg/m(2)/q1. METHODS: Patients were treated from 1/2010 to 1/2017 in two Radiation Oncology Centres. Propensity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buglione, Michela, Alterio, Daniela, Maddalo, Marta, Greco, Diana, Gerardi, Marianna Alessandra, Tomasini, Davide, Pegurri, Ludovica, Augugliaro, Matteo, Marvaso, Giulia, Turturici, Irene, Guerini, Andrea, Ansarin, Mohssen, Spiazzi, Luigi, Costa, Loredana, Cossu Rocca, Maria, Magrini, Stefano Maria, Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8686550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01966-4
_version_ 1784618038294740992
author Buglione, Michela
Alterio, Daniela
Maddalo, Marta
Greco, Diana
Gerardi, Marianna Alessandra
Tomasini, Davide
Pegurri, Ludovica
Augugliaro, Matteo
Marvaso, Giulia
Turturici, Irene
Guerini, Andrea
Ansarin, Mohssen
Spiazzi, Luigi
Costa, Loredana
Cossu Rocca, Maria
Magrini, Stefano Maria
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
author_facet Buglione, Michela
Alterio, Daniela
Maddalo, Marta
Greco, Diana
Gerardi, Marianna Alessandra
Tomasini, Davide
Pegurri, Ludovica
Augugliaro, Matteo
Marvaso, Giulia
Turturici, Irene
Guerini, Andrea
Ansarin, Mohssen
Spiazzi, Luigi
Costa, Loredana
Cossu Rocca, Maria
Magrini, Stefano Maria
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
author_sort Buglione, Michela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radio-chemotherapy with CDDP is the standard for H&N squamous cell cancer. CDDP 100 mg/m(2)/q3 is the standard; alternative schedules are used to reduce toxicity, mostly 40 mg/m(2)/q1. METHODS: Patients were treated from 1/2010 to 1/2017 in two Radiation Oncology Centres. Propensity score analysis (PS) was retrospectively used to compare these two schedules. RESULTS: Patients analyzed were 166. Most (114/166) had 1w-CDDP while 52 had 3w-CDDP. In the 3w-CDDP group, patients were younger, with better performance status, smaller disease extent and a more common nodal involvement than in the 1w-CDDP. Acute toxicity was similar in the groups. Treatment compliance was lower in the w-CCDP. Overall survival before PS was better for female, for oropharyngeal disease and for 3w-CDDP group. After PS, survival was not related to the CDDP schedule. CONCLUSIONS: 3w-CDDP remains the standard for fit patients, weekly schedule could be safely used in selected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8686550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86865502021-12-20 Three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: safety propensity score analysis on 166 head and neck cancer patients Buglione, Michela Alterio, Daniela Maddalo, Marta Greco, Diana Gerardi, Marianna Alessandra Tomasini, Davide Pegurri, Ludovica Augugliaro, Matteo Marvaso, Giulia Turturici, Irene Guerini, Andrea Ansarin, Mohssen Spiazzi, Luigi Costa, Loredana Cossu Rocca, Maria Magrini, Stefano Maria Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Radio-chemotherapy with CDDP is the standard for H&N squamous cell cancer. CDDP 100 mg/m(2)/q3 is the standard; alternative schedules are used to reduce toxicity, mostly 40 mg/m(2)/q1. METHODS: Patients were treated from 1/2010 to 1/2017 in two Radiation Oncology Centres. Propensity score analysis (PS) was retrospectively used to compare these two schedules. RESULTS: Patients analyzed were 166. Most (114/166) had 1w-CDDP while 52 had 3w-CDDP. In the 3w-CDDP group, patients were younger, with better performance status, smaller disease extent and a more common nodal involvement than in the 1w-CDDP. Acute toxicity was similar in the groups. Treatment compliance was lower in the w-CCDP. Overall survival before PS was better for female, for oropharyngeal disease and for 3w-CDDP group. After PS, survival was not related to the CDDP schedule. CONCLUSIONS: 3w-CDDP remains the standard for fit patients, weekly schedule could be safely used in selected patients. BioMed Central 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8686550/ /pubmed/34930353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01966-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Buglione, Michela
Alterio, Daniela
Maddalo, Marta
Greco, Diana
Gerardi, Marianna Alessandra
Tomasini, Davide
Pegurri, Ludovica
Augugliaro, Matteo
Marvaso, Giulia
Turturici, Irene
Guerini, Andrea
Ansarin, Mohssen
Spiazzi, Luigi
Costa, Loredana
Cossu Rocca, Maria
Magrini, Stefano Maria
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
Three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: safety propensity score analysis on 166 head and neck cancer patients
title Three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: safety propensity score analysis on 166 head and neck cancer patients
title_full Three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: safety propensity score analysis on 166 head and neck cancer patients
title_fullStr Three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: safety propensity score analysis on 166 head and neck cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: safety propensity score analysis on 166 head and neck cancer patients
title_short Three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: safety propensity score analysis on 166 head and neck cancer patients
title_sort three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: safety propensity score analysis on 166 head and neck cancer patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8686550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01966-4
work_keys_str_mv AT buglionemichela threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT alteriodaniela threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT maddalomarta threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT grecodiana threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT gerardimariannaalessandra threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT tomasinidavide threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT pegurriludovica threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT augugliaromatteo threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT marvasogiulia threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT turturiciirene threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT gueriniandrea threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT ansarinmohssen threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT spiazziluigi threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT costaloredana threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT cossuroccamaria threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT magrinistefanomaria threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients
AT jereczekfossabarbaraalicja threeweeklyversusweeklyconcurrentcisplatinsafetypropensityscoreanalysison166headandneckcancerpatients