Cargando…

Surface EMG-based quantification of inspiratory effort: a quantitative comparison with P(es)

BACKGROUND: Inspiratory patient effort under assisted mechanical ventilation is an important quantity for assessing patient–ventilator interaction and recognizing over and under assistance. An established clinical standard is respiratory muscle pressure [Formula: see text] , derived from esophageal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graßhoff, Jan, Petersen, Eike, Farquharson, Franziska, Kustermann, Max, Kabitz, Hans-Joachim, Rostalski, Philipp, Walterspacher, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8686581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03833-w
_version_ 1784618044444639232
author Graßhoff, Jan
Petersen, Eike
Farquharson, Franziska
Kustermann, Max
Kabitz, Hans-Joachim
Rostalski, Philipp
Walterspacher, Stephan
author_facet Graßhoff, Jan
Petersen, Eike
Farquharson, Franziska
Kustermann, Max
Kabitz, Hans-Joachim
Rostalski, Philipp
Walterspacher, Stephan
author_sort Graßhoff, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inspiratory patient effort under assisted mechanical ventilation is an important quantity for assessing patient–ventilator interaction and recognizing over and under assistance. An established clinical standard is respiratory muscle pressure [Formula: see text] , derived from esophageal pressure ([Formula: see text] ), which requires the correct placement and calibration of an esophageal balloon catheter. Surface electromyography (sEMG) of the respiratory muscles represents a promising and straightforward alternative technique, enabling non-invasive monitoring of patient activity. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted with patients under assisted mechanical ventilation, who were scheduled for elective bronchoscopy. Airway flow and pressure, esophageal/gastric pressures and sEMG of the diaphragm and intercostal muscles were recorded at four levels of pressure support ventilation. Patient efforts were quantified via the [Formula: see text] -time product ([Formula: see text] ), the transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product ([Formula: see text] ) and the EMG-time products (ETP) of the two sEMG channels. To improve the signal-to-noise ratio, a method for automatically selecting the more informative of the sEMG channels was investigated. Correlation between ETP and [Formula: see text] was assessed by determining a neuromechanical conversion factor [Formula: see text] between the two quantities. Moreover, it was investigated whether this scalar can be reliably determined from airway pressure during occlusion maneuvers, thus allowing to quantify inspiratory effort based solely on sEMG measurements. RESULTS: In total, 62 patients with heterogeneous pulmonary diseases were enrolled in the study, 43 of which were included in the data analysis. The ETP of the two sEMG channels was well correlated with [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for diaphragm and intercostal recordings, respectively). The proposed automatic channel selection method improved correlation with [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] ). The neuromechanical conversion factor obtained by fitting ETP to [Formula: see text] varied widely between patients ([Formula: see text] ) and was highly correlated with the scalar determined during occlusions ([Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] ). The occlusion-based method for deriving [Formula: see text] from ETP showed a breath-wise deviation to [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] across all datasets. CONCLUSION: These results support the use of surface electromyography as a non-invasive alternative for monitoring breath-by-breath inspiratory effort of patients under assisted mechanical ventilation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03833-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8686581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86865812021-12-20 Surface EMG-based quantification of inspiratory effort: a quantitative comparison with P(es) Graßhoff, Jan Petersen, Eike Farquharson, Franziska Kustermann, Max Kabitz, Hans-Joachim Rostalski, Philipp Walterspacher, Stephan Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Inspiratory patient effort under assisted mechanical ventilation is an important quantity for assessing patient–ventilator interaction and recognizing over and under assistance. An established clinical standard is respiratory muscle pressure [Formula: see text] , derived from esophageal pressure ([Formula: see text] ), which requires the correct placement and calibration of an esophageal balloon catheter. Surface electromyography (sEMG) of the respiratory muscles represents a promising and straightforward alternative technique, enabling non-invasive monitoring of patient activity. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted with patients under assisted mechanical ventilation, who were scheduled for elective bronchoscopy. Airway flow and pressure, esophageal/gastric pressures and sEMG of the diaphragm and intercostal muscles were recorded at four levels of pressure support ventilation. Patient efforts were quantified via the [Formula: see text] -time product ([Formula: see text] ), the transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product ([Formula: see text] ) and the EMG-time products (ETP) of the two sEMG channels. To improve the signal-to-noise ratio, a method for automatically selecting the more informative of the sEMG channels was investigated. Correlation between ETP and [Formula: see text] was assessed by determining a neuromechanical conversion factor [Formula: see text] between the two quantities. Moreover, it was investigated whether this scalar can be reliably determined from airway pressure during occlusion maneuvers, thus allowing to quantify inspiratory effort based solely on sEMG measurements. RESULTS: In total, 62 patients with heterogeneous pulmonary diseases were enrolled in the study, 43 of which were included in the data analysis. The ETP of the two sEMG channels was well correlated with [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for diaphragm and intercostal recordings, respectively). The proposed automatic channel selection method improved correlation with [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] ). The neuromechanical conversion factor obtained by fitting ETP to [Formula: see text] varied widely between patients ([Formula: see text] ) and was highly correlated with the scalar determined during occlusions ([Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] ). The occlusion-based method for deriving [Formula: see text] from ETP showed a breath-wise deviation to [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] across all datasets. CONCLUSION: These results support the use of surface electromyography as a non-invasive alternative for monitoring breath-by-breath inspiratory effort of patients under assisted mechanical ventilation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03833-w. BioMed Central 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8686581/ /pubmed/34930396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03833-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Graßhoff, Jan
Petersen, Eike
Farquharson, Franziska
Kustermann, Max
Kabitz, Hans-Joachim
Rostalski, Philipp
Walterspacher, Stephan
Surface EMG-based quantification of inspiratory effort: a quantitative comparison with P(es)
title Surface EMG-based quantification of inspiratory effort: a quantitative comparison with P(es)
title_full Surface EMG-based quantification of inspiratory effort: a quantitative comparison with P(es)
title_fullStr Surface EMG-based quantification of inspiratory effort: a quantitative comparison with P(es)
title_full_unstemmed Surface EMG-based quantification of inspiratory effort: a quantitative comparison with P(es)
title_short Surface EMG-based quantification of inspiratory effort: a quantitative comparison with P(es)
title_sort surface emg-based quantification of inspiratory effort: a quantitative comparison with p(es)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8686581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03833-w
work_keys_str_mv AT graßhoffjan surfaceemgbasedquantificationofinspiratoryeffortaquantitativecomparisonwithpes
AT peterseneike surfaceemgbasedquantificationofinspiratoryeffortaquantitativecomparisonwithpes
AT farquharsonfranziska surfaceemgbasedquantificationofinspiratoryeffortaquantitativecomparisonwithpes
AT kustermannmax surfaceemgbasedquantificationofinspiratoryeffortaquantitativecomparisonwithpes
AT kabitzhansjoachim surfaceemgbasedquantificationofinspiratoryeffortaquantitativecomparisonwithpes
AT rostalskiphilipp surfaceemgbasedquantificationofinspiratoryeffortaquantitativecomparisonwithpes
AT walterspacherstephan surfaceemgbasedquantificationofinspiratoryeffortaquantitativecomparisonwithpes