Cargando…
Rationale and design of the multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized trial APrepitant versus HYdroxyzine in association with cytoreductive treatments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasia suffering from Persistent Aquagenic Pruritus. Trial acronym: APHYPAP
BACKGROUND: Aquagenic pruritus (AP), an intense sensation of scratching induced after water contact, is the most troublesome aspect of BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Mostly described in polycythemia vera (PV, ~ 40%), it is also present in essential thrombocythemia (ET) and pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8686668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34923994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05864-8 |
_version_ | 1784618061337198592 |
---|---|
author | Le Gall-Ianotto, C. Verdet, R. Nowak, E. Le Roux, L. Gasse, A. Fiedler, A. Carlhant-Kowalski, D. Marcorelles, P. Misery, L. Ianotto, J. C. |
author_facet | Le Gall-Ianotto, C. Verdet, R. Nowak, E. Le Roux, L. Gasse, A. Fiedler, A. Carlhant-Kowalski, D. Marcorelles, P. Misery, L. Ianotto, J. C. |
author_sort | Le Gall-Ianotto, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Aquagenic pruritus (AP), an intense sensation of scratching induced after water contact, is the most troublesome aspect of BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Mostly described in polycythemia vera (PV, ~ 40%), it is also present in essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) (10%). Even if this symptom can decrease or disappear under cytoreductive treatments, 30% of treated MPN patients still persist with a real impact on the quality of life (QoL). Because its pathophysiology is poorly understood, efficient symptomatic treatments of AP are missing. The neuropeptide substance P (SP) plays a crucial role in the induction of pruritus. Several studies showed the efficacy of aprepitant, an antagonist of SP receptor (NK-1R), in the treatment of chronic pruritus but never evaluated in AP. The objectives of APHYPAP are twofold: a clinical aim with the evaluation of the efficacy of two drugs in the treatment of a persistent AP for MPN patients and a biological aim to find clues to elucidate AP pathophysiology. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized study will include 80 patients with MPN (PV or ET or PMF) treated since at least 6 months for their hemopathy but suffering from a persistent AP (VAS intensity ≥6/10). Patients will be randomized between aprepitant (80 mg daily) + placebo to match to hydroxyzine OR hydroxyzine (25 mg daily) + placebo to match to aprepitant for 14 days. At D0, baseline information will be collected and drugs dispense. Outcome measures will be assessed at D15, D30, D45, and D60. The primary study endpoint will be the reduction of pruritus intensity below (or equal) at 3/10 on VAS at D15. Secondary outcome measures will include the number of patients with a reduction or cessation of AP at D15 or D60; evaluation of QoL and AP characteristics at D0, D15, D30, D45, and D60 with MPN-SAF and AP questionnaires, respectively; modification of plasmatic concentrations of cytokines and neuropeptides at D0, D15, D30, and D60; and modification of epidermal innervation density and pruriceptor expression at D0 and D15. DISCUSSION: The APHYPAP trial will examine the efficacy of aprepitant vs hydroxyzine (reference treatment for AP) to treat persistent AP in MPN patients. The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of aprepitant vs hydroxyzine to treat persistent AP of MPN patients. The treatment received will be considered efficient if the AP intensity will be reduced at 3/10 or below on VAS after 14 days of treatment. The results of this study may provide a new treatment option for this troublesome symptom and also give us more insights in the pathophysiology understanding of AP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: APHYPAP. NCT03808805, first posted: January 18, 2019; last update posted: June 10, 2021. EudraCT 2018-090426-66 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8686668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86866682021-12-21 Rationale and design of the multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized trial APrepitant versus HYdroxyzine in association with cytoreductive treatments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasia suffering from Persistent Aquagenic Pruritus. Trial acronym: APHYPAP Le Gall-Ianotto, C. Verdet, R. Nowak, E. Le Roux, L. Gasse, A. Fiedler, A. Carlhant-Kowalski, D. Marcorelles, P. Misery, L. Ianotto, J. C. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Aquagenic pruritus (AP), an intense sensation of scratching induced after water contact, is the most troublesome aspect of BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Mostly described in polycythemia vera (PV, ~ 40%), it is also present in essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) (10%). Even if this symptom can decrease or disappear under cytoreductive treatments, 30% of treated MPN patients still persist with a real impact on the quality of life (QoL). Because its pathophysiology is poorly understood, efficient symptomatic treatments of AP are missing. The neuropeptide substance P (SP) plays a crucial role in the induction of pruritus. Several studies showed the efficacy of aprepitant, an antagonist of SP receptor (NK-1R), in the treatment of chronic pruritus but never evaluated in AP. The objectives of APHYPAP are twofold: a clinical aim with the evaluation of the efficacy of two drugs in the treatment of a persistent AP for MPN patients and a biological aim to find clues to elucidate AP pathophysiology. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized study will include 80 patients with MPN (PV or ET or PMF) treated since at least 6 months for their hemopathy but suffering from a persistent AP (VAS intensity ≥6/10). Patients will be randomized between aprepitant (80 mg daily) + placebo to match to hydroxyzine OR hydroxyzine (25 mg daily) + placebo to match to aprepitant for 14 days. At D0, baseline information will be collected and drugs dispense. Outcome measures will be assessed at D15, D30, D45, and D60. The primary study endpoint will be the reduction of pruritus intensity below (or equal) at 3/10 on VAS at D15. Secondary outcome measures will include the number of patients with a reduction or cessation of AP at D15 or D60; evaluation of QoL and AP characteristics at D0, D15, D30, D45, and D60 with MPN-SAF and AP questionnaires, respectively; modification of plasmatic concentrations of cytokines and neuropeptides at D0, D15, D30, and D60; and modification of epidermal innervation density and pruriceptor expression at D0 and D15. DISCUSSION: The APHYPAP trial will examine the efficacy of aprepitant vs hydroxyzine (reference treatment for AP) to treat persistent AP in MPN patients. The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of aprepitant vs hydroxyzine to treat persistent AP of MPN patients. The treatment received will be considered efficient if the AP intensity will be reduced at 3/10 or below on VAS after 14 days of treatment. The results of this study may provide a new treatment option for this troublesome symptom and also give us more insights in the pathophysiology understanding of AP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: APHYPAP. NCT03808805, first posted: January 18, 2019; last update posted: June 10, 2021. EudraCT 2018-090426-66 BioMed Central 2021-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8686668/ /pubmed/34923994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05864-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Le Gall-Ianotto, C. Verdet, R. Nowak, E. Le Roux, L. Gasse, A. Fiedler, A. Carlhant-Kowalski, D. Marcorelles, P. Misery, L. Ianotto, J. C. Rationale and design of the multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized trial APrepitant versus HYdroxyzine in association with cytoreductive treatments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasia suffering from Persistent Aquagenic Pruritus. Trial acronym: APHYPAP |
title | Rationale and design of the multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized trial APrepitant versus HYdroxyzine in association with cytoreductive treatments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasia suffering from Persistent Aquagenic Pruritus. Trial acronym: APHYPAP |
title_full | Rationale and design of the multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized trial APrepitant versus HYdroxyzine in association with cytoreductive treatments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasia suffering from Persistent Aquagenic Pruritus. Trial acronym: APHYPAP |
title_fullStr | Rationale and design of the multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized trial APrepitant versus HYdroxyzine in association with cytoreductive treatments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasia suffering from Persistent Aquagenic Pruritus. Trial acronym: APHYPAP |
title_full_unstemmed | Rationale and design of the multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized trial APrepitant versus HYdroxyzine in association with cytoreductive treatments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasia suffering from Persistent Aquagenic Pruritus. Trial acronym: APHYPAP |
title_short | Rationale and design of the multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized trial APrepitant versus HYdroxyzine in association with cytoreductive treatments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasia suffering from Persistent Aquagenic Pruritus. Trial acronym: APHYPAP |
title_sort | rationale and design of the multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized trial aprepitant versus hydroxyzine in association with cytoreductive treatments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasia suffering from persistent aquagenic pruritus. trial acronym: aphypap |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8686668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34923994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05864-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT legallianottoc rationaleanddesignofthemulticentricdoubleblinddoubleplaceborandomizedtrialaprepitantversushydroxyzineinassociationwithcytoreductivetreatmentsforpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasiasufferingfrompersistentaquagenicpruritustrialacronymaphypap AT verdetr rationaleanddesignofthemulticentricdoubleblinddoubleplaceborandomizedtrialaprepitantversushydroxyzineinassociationwithcytoreductivetreatmentsforpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasiasufferingfrompersistentaquagenicpruritustrialacronymaphypap AT nowake rationaleanddesignofthemulticentricdoubleblinddoubleplaceborandomizedtrialaprepitantversushydroxyzineinassociationwithcytoreductivetreatmentsforpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasiasufferingfrompersistentaquagenicpruritustrialacronymaphypap AT lerouxl rationaleanddesignofthemulticentricdoubleblinddoubleplaceborandomizedtrialaprepitantversushydroxyzineinassociationwithcytoreductivetreatmentsforpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasiasufferingfrompersistentaquagenicpruritustrialacronymaphypap AT gassea rationaleanddesignofthemulticentricdoubleblinddoubleplaceborandomizedtrialaprepitantversushydroxyzineinassociationwithcytoreductivetreatmentsforpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasiasufferingfrompersistentaquagenicpruritustrialacronymaphypap AT fiedlera rationaleanddesignofthemulticentricdoubleblinddoubleplaceborandomizedtrialaprepitantversushydroxyzineinassociationwithcytoreductivetreatmentsforpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasiasufferingfrompersistentaquagenicpruritustrialacronymaphypap AT carlhantkowalskid rationaleanddesignofthemulticentricdoubleblinddoubleplaceborandomizedtrialaprepitantversushydroxyzineinassociationwithcytoreductivetreatmentsforpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasiasufferingfrompersistentaquagenicpruritustrialacronymaphypap AT marcorellesp rationaleanddesignofthemulticentricdoubleblinddoubleplaceborandomizedtrialaprepitantversushydroxyzineinassociationwithcytoreductivetreatmentsforpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasiasufferingfrompersistentaquagenicpruritustrialacronymaphypap AT miseryl rationaleanddesignofthemulticentricdoubleblinddoubleplaceborandomizedtrialaprepitantversushydroxyzineinassociationwithcytoreductivetreatmentsforpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasiasufferingfrompersistentaquagenicpruritustrialacronymaphypap AT ianottojc rationaleanddesignofthemulticentricdoubleblinddoubleplaceborandomizedtrialaprepitantversushydroxyzineinassociationwithcytoreductivetreatmentsforpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasiasufferingfrompersistentaquagenicpruritustrialacronymaphypap |