Cargando…

Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST v2 Assay for Respiratory Viral Infections

PURPOSE: Acute respiratory viral infections pose significant morbidity and mortality, making it essential to diagnose respiratory viral infections rapidly. In this study, the diagnostic efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP) FAST v2 test was evaluated on respiratory viral infecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Li-Min, Yin, Xin, Xie, Tian-Ao, Su, Jian-Wen, Huang, Qin, Zhang, Jing-Hao, Huang, Yin-Fei, Guo, Xu-Guang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8688366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34913289
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.1.95
_version_ 1784618334618124288
author Xie, Li-Min
Yin, Xin
Xie, Tian-Ao
Su, Jian-Wen
Huang, Qin
Zhang, Jing-Hao
Huang, Yin-Fei
Guo, Xu-Guang
author_facet Xie, Li-Min
Yin, Xin
Xie, Tian-Ao
Su, Jian-Wen
Huang, Qin
Zhang, Jing-Hao
Huang, Yin-Fei
Guo, Xu-Guang
author_sort Xie, Li-Min
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Acute respiratory viral infections pose significant morbidity and mortality, making it essential to diagnose respiratory viral infections rapidly. In this study, the diagnostic efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP) FAST v2 test was evaluated on respiratory viral infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Information was retrieved from electronic databases, including Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library, for systematic review. Studies that fulfilled predefined inclusion criteria were included. After the extraction of information, statistical software was utilized for quality evaluation, data analysis, and assessment of publication bias. RESULTS: Eighty groups in fourfold tables from nine articles were included to perform statistical analyses. Therein, the mean specificity and mean sensitivity of Luminex xTAG RVP FAST v2 test for the detection of respiratory viral infections were 0.99 (0.98–0.99) and 0.88 (0.87–0.90), respectively. Additionally, the negative and positive likelihood ratios were 0.14 (0.11–0.19) and 87.42 (61.88–123.50), respectively. Moreover, the diagnostic odds ratio and area under the curve of summary receiver operating characteristic were 714.80 and 0.9886, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Luminex xTAG RVP FAST v2 test could be a reliable and rapid diagnostic method for multiple respiratory viral infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8688366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86883662022-01-05 Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST v2 Assay for Respiratory Viral Infections Xie, Li-Min Yin, Xin Xie, Tian-Ao Su, Jian-Wen Huang, Qin Zhang, Jing-Hao Huang, Yin-Fei Guo, Xu-Guang Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: Acute respiratory viral infections pose significant morbidity and mortality, making it essential to diagnose respiratory viral infections rapidly. In this study, the diagnostic efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP) FAST v2 test was evaluated on respiratory viral infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Information was retrieved from electronic databases, including Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library, for systematic review. Studies that fulfilled predefined inclusion criteria were included. After the extraction of information, statistical software was utilized for quality evaluation, data analysis, and assessment of publication bias. RESULTS: Eighty groups in fourfold tables from nine articles were included to perform statistical analyses. Therein, the mean specificity and mean sensitivity of Luminex xTAG RVP FAST v2 test for the detection of respiratory viral infections were 0.99 (0.98–0.99) and 0.88 (0.87–0.90), respectively. Additionally, the negative and positive likelihood ratios were 0.14 (0.11–0.19) and 87.42 (61.88–123.50), respectively. Moreover, the diagnostic odds ratio and area under the curve of summary receiver operating characteristic were 714.80 and 0.9886, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Luminex xTAG RVP FAST v2 test could be a reliable and rapid diagnostic method for multiple respiratory viral infections. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022-01 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8688366/ /pubmed/34913289 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.1.95 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Xie, Li-Min
Yin, Xin
Xie, Tian-Ao
Su, Jian-Wen
Huang, Qin
Zhang, Jing-Hao
Huang, Yin-Fei
Guo, Xu-Guang
Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST v2 Assay for Respiratory Viral Infections
title Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST v2 Assay for Respiratory Viral Infections
title_full Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST v2 Assay for Respiratory Viral Infections
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST v2 Assay for Respiratory Viral Infections
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST v2 Assay for Respiratory Viral Infections
title_short Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST v2 Assay for Respiratory Viral Infections
title_sort meta-analysis of the diagnostic efficacy of the luminex xtag respiratory viral panel fast v2 assay for respiratory viral infections
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8688366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34913289
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.1.95
work_keys_str_mv AT xielimin metaanalysisofthediagnosticefficacyoftheluminexxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastv2assayforrespiratoryviralinfections
AT yinxin metaanalysisofthediagnosticefficacyoftheluminexxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastv2assayforrespiratoryviralinfections
AT xietianao metaanalysisofthediagnosticefficacyoftheluminexxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastv2assayforrespiratoryviralinfections
AT sujianwen metaanalysisofthediagnosticefficacyoftheluminexxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastv2assayforrespiratoryviralinfections
AT huangqin metaanalysisofthediagnosticefficacyoftheluminexxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastv2assayforrespiratoryviralinfections
AT zhangjinghao metaanalysisofthediagnosticefficacyoftheluminexxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastv2assayforrespiratoryviralinfections
AT huangyinfei metaanalysisofthediagnosticefficacyoftheluminexxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastv2assayforrespiratoryviralinfections
AT guoxuguang metaanalysisofthediagnosticefficacyoftheluminexxtagrespiratoryviralpanelfastv2assayforrespiratoryviralinfections