Cargando…

Current status of neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated demyelination and consequent degeneration of oligodendrocytes and axons are hallmark features of multiple sclerosis (MS). Remyelination declines in progressive MS, causing permanent axonal loss and irreversible disabilities. Strategies aimed at enhancing remyelination are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allanach, Jessica R, Farrell, John W., Mésidor, Miceline, Karimi-Abdolrezaee, Soheila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8688986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33870797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585211008760
_version_ 1784618464838680576
author Allanach, Jessica R
Farrell, John W.
Mésidor, Miceline
Karimi-Abdolrezaee, Soheila
author_facet Allanach, Jessica R
Farrell, John W.
Mésidor, Miceline
Karimi-Abdolrezaee, Soheila
author_sort Allanach, Jessica R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated demyelination and consequent degeneration of oligodendrocytes and axons are hallmark features of multiple sclerosis (MS). Remyelination declines in progressive MS, causing permanent axonal loss and irreversible disabilities. Strategies aimed at enhancing remyelination are critical to attenuate disease progression. OBJECTIVE: We systematically reviewed recent advances in neuroprotective and regenerative therapies for MS, covering preclinical and clinical studies. METHODS: We searched three biomedical databases using defined keywords. Two authors independently reviewed articles for inclusion based on pre-specified criteria. The data were extracted from each study and assessed for risk of bias. RESULTS: Our search identified 7351 studies from 2014 to 2020, of which 221 met the defined criteria. These studies reported 262 interventions, wherein 92% were evaluated in animal models. These interventions comprised protein, RNA, lipid and cellular biologics, small molecules, inorganic compounds, and dietary and physiological interventions. Small molecules were the most highly represented strategy, followed by antibody therapies and stem cell transplantation. CONCLUSION: While significant strides have been made to develop regenerative treatments for MS, the current evidence illustrates a skewed representation of the types of strategies that advance to clinical trials. Further examination is thus required to address current barriers to implementing experimental treatments in clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8688986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86889862021-12-22 Current status of neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review Allanach, Jessica R Farrell, John W. Mésidor, Miceline Karimi-Abdolrezaee, Soheila Mult Scler Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated demyelination and consequent degeneration of oligodendrocytes and axons are hallmark features of multiple sclerosis (MS). Remyelination declines in progressive MS, causing permanent axonal loss and irreversible disabilities. Strategies aimed at enhancing remyelination are critical to attenuate disease progression. OBJECTIVE: We systematically reviewed recent advances in neuroprotective and regenerative therapies for MS, covering preclinical and clinical studies. METHODS: We searched three biomedical databases using defined keywords. Two authors independently reviewed articles for inclusion based on pre-specified criteria. The data were extracted from each study and assessed for risk of bias. RESULTS: Our search identified 7351 studies from 2014 to 2020, of which 221 met the defined criteria. These studies reported 262 interventions, wherein 92% were evaluated in animal models. These interventions comprised protein, RNA, lipid and cellular biologics, small molecules, inorganic compounds, and dietary and physiological interventions. Small molecules were the most highly represented strategy, followed by antibody therapies and stem cell transplantation. CONCLUSION: While significant strides have been made to develop regenerative treatments for MS, the current evidence illustrates a skewed representation of the types of strategies that advance to clinical trials. Further examination is thus required to address current barriers to implementing experimental treatments in clinical settings. SAGE Publications 2021-04-19 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8688986/ /pubmed/33870797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585211008760 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Allanach, Jessica R
Farrell, John W.
Mésidor, Miceline
Karimi-Abdolrezaee, Soheila
Current status of neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
title Current status of neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
title_full Current status of neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
title_fullStr Current status of neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Current status of neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
title_short Current status of neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
title_sort current status of neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8688986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33870797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585211008760
work_keys_str_mv AT allanachjessicar currentstatusofneuroprotectiveandneuroregenerativestrategiesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT farrelljohnw currentstatusofneuroprotectiveandneuroregenerativestrategiesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT mesidormiceline currentstatusofneuroprotectiveandneuroregenerativestrategiesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT karimiabdolrezaeesoheila currentstatusofneuroprotectiveandneuroregenerativestrategiesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview