Cargando…
Sensitivity and specificity of anti-double-stranded RNA immunofluorescence for universal detection of viral infection in respiratory specimens
BACKGROUND: Emerging viruses could be detected before reaching pandemic level if universal viral detection screening was routinely used. Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is the only common antigen across most viral families. Anti-dsRNA immunofluorescence has shown promising results in vitro; however, its...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08471 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Emerging viruses could be detected before reaching pandemic level if universal viral detection screening was routinely used. Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is the only common antigen across most viral families. Anti-dsRNA immunofluorescence has shown promising results in vitro; however, its diagnostic value in respiratory specimens has not been evaluated. METHODS: Consecutive inpatient cases of suspected respiratory viral infections were prospectively enrolled. Respiratory samples were collected and divided for anti-dsRNA immunofluorescence (index test) and 19-subtypes respiratory virus microarray (reference standard). Using fluorescence microscopy, positive or negative anti-dsRNA IF results were determined independently by two raters. RESULTS: By microarray, 108 and 87 samples were positive and negative for viruses, respectively. The anti-dsRNA IF sensitivity was 83.3% (95%CI 76.1%–90.2%), while specificity was 87.4% (95%CI 80.8%–93.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-dsRNA IF is simple to perform, with acceptable accuracy, and suitable for point-of-care respiratory virus screening. Unlike most molecular techniques, known viral genome sequences are not required. |
---|