Cargando…
Assessment of the effect of a comprehensive chest radiograph deep learning model on radiologist reports and patient outcomes: a real-world observational study
OBJECTIVES: Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been developed to detect imaging features on chest X-ray (CXR) with a comprehensive AI model capable of detecting 124 CXR findings being recently developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world usefulness of the model as a diag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052902 |
_version_ | 1784618494016356352 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Catherine M Danaher, Luke Milne, Michael R Tang, Cyril Seah, Jarrel Oakden-Rayner, Luke Johnson, Andrew Buchlak, Quinlan D Esmaili, Nazanin |
author_facet | Jones, Catherine M Danaher, Luke Milne, Michael R Tang, Cyril Seah, Jarrel Oakden-Rayner, Luke Johnson, Andrew Buchlak, Quinlan D Esmaili, Nazanin |
author_sort | Jones, Catherine M |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been developed to detect imaging features on chest X-ray (CXR) with a comprehensive AI model capable of detecting 124 CXR findings being recently developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world usefulness of the model as a diagnostic assistance device for radiologists. DESIGN: This prospective real-world multicentre study involved a group of radiologists using the model in their daily reporting workflow to report consecutive CXRs and recording their feedback on level of agreement with the model findings and whether this significantly affected their reporting. SETTING: The study took place at radiology clinics and hospitals within a large radiology network in Australia between November and December 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven consultant diagnostic radiologists of varying levels of experience participated in this study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of CXR cases where use of the AI model led to significant material changes to the radiologist report, to patient management, or to imaging recommendations. Additionally, level of agreement between radiologists and the model findings, and radiologist attitudes towards the model were assessed. RESULTS: Of 2972 cases reviewed with the model, 92 cases (3.1%) had significant report changes, 43 cases (1.4%) had changed patient management and 29 cases (1.0%) had further imaging recommendations. In terms of agreement with the model, 2569 cases showed complete agreement (86.5%). 390 (13%) cases had one or more findings rejected by the radiologist. There were 16 findings across 13 cases (0.5%) deemed to be missed by the model. Nine out of 10 radiologists felt their accuracy was improved with the model and were more positive towards AI poststudy. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an AI model in a real-world reporting environment significantly improved radiologist reporting and showed good agreement with radiologists, highlighting the potential for AI diagnostic support to improve clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8689166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86891662022-01-05 Assessment of the effect of a comprehensive chest radiograph deep learning model on radiologist reports and patient outcomes: a real-world observational study Jones, Catherine M Danaher, Luke Milne, Michael R Tang, Cyril Seah, Jarrel Oakden-Rayner, Luke Johnson, Andrew Buchlak, Quinlan D Esmaili, Nazanin BMJ Open Radiology and Imaging OBJECTIVES: Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been developed to detect imaging features on chest X-ray (CXR) with a comprehensive AI model capable of detecting 124 CXR findings being recently developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world usefulness of the model as a diagnostic assistance device for radiologists. DESIGN: This prospective real-world multicentre study involved a group of radiologists using the model in their daily reporting workflow to report consecutive CXRs and recording their feedback on level of agreement with the model findings and whether this significantly affected their reporting. SETTING: The study took place at radiology clinics and hospitals within a large radiology network in Australia between November and December 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven consultant diagnostic radiologists of varying levels of experience participated in this study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of CXR cases where use of the AI model led to significant material changes to the radiologist report, to patient management, or to imaging recommendations. Additionally, level of agreement between radiologists and the model findings, and radiologist attitudes towards the model were assessed. RESULTS: Of 2972 cases reviewed with the model, 92 cases (3.1%) had significant report changes, 43 cases (1.4%) had changed patient management and 29 cases (1.0%) had further imaging recommendations. In terms of agreement with the model, 2569 cases showed complete agreement (86.5%). 390 (13%) cases had one or more findings rejected by the radiologist. There were 16 findings across 13 cases (0.5%) deemed to be missed by the model. Nine out of 10 radiologists felt their accuracy was improved with the model and were more positive towards AI poststudy. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an AI model in a real-world reporting environment significantly improved radiologist reporting and showed good agreement with radiologists, highlighting the potential for AI diagnostic support to improve clinical practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8689166/ /pubmed/34930738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052902 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Radiology and Imaging Jones, Catherine M Danaher, Luke Milne, Michael R Tang, Cyril Seah, Jarrel Oakden-Rayner, Luke Johnson, Andrew Buchlak, Quinlan D Esmaili, Nazanin Assessment of the effect of a comprehensive chest radiograph deep learning model on radiologist reports and patient outcomes: a real-world observational study |
title | Assessment of the effect of a comprehensive chest radiograph deep learning model on radiologist reports and patient outcomes: a real-world observational study |
title_full | Assessment of the effect of a comprehensive chest radiograph deep learning model on radiologist reports and patient outcomes: a real-world observational study |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the effect of a comprehensive chest radiograph deep learning model on radiologist reports and patient outcomes: a real-world observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the effect of a comprehensive chest radiograph deep learning model on radiologist reports and patient outcomes: a real-world observational study |
title_short | Assessment of the effect of a comprehensive chest radiograph deep learning model on radiologist reports and patient outcomes: a real-world observational study |
title_sort | assessment of the effect of a comprehensive chest radiograph deep learning model on radiologist reports and patient outcomes: a real-world observational study |
topic | Radiology and Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052902 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonescatherinem assessmentoftheeffectofacomprehensivechestradiographdeeplearningmodelonradiologistreportsandpatientoutcomesarealworldobservationalstudy AT danaherluke assessmentoftheeffectofacomprehensivechestradiographdeeplearningmodelonradiologistreportsandpatientoutcomesarealworldobservationalstudy AT milnemichaelr assessmentoftheeffectofacomprehensivechestradiographdeeplearningmodelonradiologistreportsandpatientoutcomesarealworldobservationalstudy AT tangcyril assessmentoftheeffectofacomprehensivechestradiographdeeplearningmodelonradiologistreportsandpatientoutcomesarealworldobservationalstudy AT seahjarrel assessmentoftheeffectofacomprehensivechestradiographdeeplearningmodelonradiologistreportsandpatientoutcomesarealworldobservationalstudy AT oakdenraynerluke assessmentoftheeffectofacomprehensivechestradiographdeeplearningmodelonradiologistreportsandpatientoutcomesarealworldobservationalstudy AT johnsonandrew assessmentoftheeffectofacomprehensivechestradiographdeeplearningmodelonradiologistreportsandpatientoutcomesarealworldobservationalstudy AT buchlakquinland assessmentoftheeffectofacomprehensivechestradiographdeeplearningmodelonradiologistreportsandpatientoutcomesarealworldobservationalstudy AT esmailinazanin assessmentoftheeffectofacomprehensivechestradiographdeeplearningmodelonradiologistreportsandpatientoutcomesarealworldobservationalstudy |