Cargando…

Development of an index system for evaluating the organisational capabilities of primary medical institutions: a modified Delphi study in China

OBJECTIVE: The low performance of primary medical institutions (PMIs) in China is a significant issue. The WHO proposed that the main reason for the failure of the healthcare system in developing countries is poor organisational capabilities. However, there is no international tool for evaluating th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Chengsen, Meng, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34921088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055422
_version_ 1784618500856217600
author Cui, Chengsen
Meng, Kai
author_facet Cui, Chengsen
Meng, Kai
author_sort Cui, Chengsen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The low performance of primary medical institutions (PMIs) in China is a significant issue. The WHO proposed that the main reason for the failure of the healthcare system in developing countries is poor organisational capabilities. However, there is no international tool for evaluating the organisational capabilities of PMIs. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an index system for evaluating the organisational capabilities of PMIs. DESIGN: We searched the literature (English and Chinese) published before June 2020 in the PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases to conduct a literature review and develop a preliminary indicator pool. Then, two rounds of Delphi expert consultations were conducted by email from June to September 2020, followed by screening, revision and supplementation of the indicators using the boundary value method. Finally, the analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weight of the indicators. SETTING: The Delphi consultation questionnaire was distributed to the leaders of PMIs in districts D, F and S in Beijing, China. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen leaders of PMIs who had a profound understanding of PMI operations and management and were able to participate in Delphi research from a professional and comprehensive perspective were included in this study. RESULTS: The Cr values were 0.76 (first-level indicators) and 0.78 (second-level indicators), indicating that the expert consultation results were accurate and reliable. The result of the expert coordination coefficient test was significant at the p<0.01 level, suggesting that the experts’ views were consistent. The organisational capability index system includes 3 first-level indicators, 9 second-level indicators and 37 third-level indicators. CONCLUSIONS: An index system for the organisational capabilities of PMIs was developed. This index system is a scoring system that focuses on basic service capabilities, management capabilities and sustainable development capabilities, and it can determine the priority of improvement areas for PMIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8689195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86891952022-01-05 Development of an index system for evaluating the organisational capabilities of primary medical institutions: a modified Delphi study in China Cui, Chengsen Meng, Kai BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVE: The low performance of primary medical institutions (PMIs) in China is a significant issue. The WHO proposed that the main reason for the failure of the healthcare system in developing countries is poor organisational capabilities. However, there is no international tool for evaluating the organisational capabilities of PMIs. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an index system for evaluating the organisational capabilities of PMIs. DESIGN: We searched the literature (English and Chinese) published before June 2020 in the PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases to conduct a literature review and develop a preliminary indicator pool. Then, two rounds of Delphi expert consultations were conducted by email from June to September 2020, followed by screening, revision and supplementation of the indicators using the boundary value method. Finally, the analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weight of the indicators. SETTING: The Delphi consultation questionnaire was distributed to the leaders of PMIs in districts D, F and S in Beijing, China. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen leaders of PMIs who had a profound understanding of PMI operations and management and were able to participate in Delphi research from a professional and comprehensive perspective were included in this study. RESULTS: The Cr values were 0.76 (first-level indicators) and 0.78 (second-level indicators), indicating that the expert consultation results were accurate and reliable. The result of the expert coordination coefficient test was significant at the p<0.01 level, suggesting that the experts’ views were consistent. The organisational capability index system includes 3 first-level indicators, 9 second-level indicators and 37 third-level indicators. CONCLUSIONS: An index system for the organisational capabilities of PMIs was developed. This index system is a scoring system that focuses on basic service capabilities, management capabilities and sustainable development capabilities, and it can determine the priority of improvement areas for PMIs. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8689195/ /pubmed/34921088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055422 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Policy
Cui, Chengsen
Meng, Kai
Development of an index system for evaluating the organisational capabilities of primary medical institutions: a modified Delphi study in China
title Development of an index system for evaluating the organisational capabilities of primary medical institutions: a modified Delphi study in China
title_full Development of an index system for evaluating the organisational capabilities of primary medical institutions: a modified Delphi study in China
title_fullStr Development of an index system for evaluating the organisational capabilities of primary medical institutions: a modified Delphi study in China
title_full_unstemmed Development of an index system for evaluating the organisational capabilities of primary medical institutions: a modified Delphi study in China
title_short Development of an index system for evaluating the organisational capabilities of primary medical institutions: a modified Delphi study in China
title_sort development of an index system for evaluating the organisational capabilities of primary medical institutions: a modified delphi study in china
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34921088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055422
work_keys_str_mv AT cuichengsen developmentofanindexsystemforevaluatingtheorganisationalcapabilitiesofprimarymedicalinstitutionsamodifieddelphistudyinchina
AT mengkai developmentofanindexsystemforevaluatingtheorganisationalcapabilitiesofprimarymedicalinstitutionsamodifieddelphistudyinchina