Cargando…

In-Office Needle Arthroscopy Can Evaluate Meniscus Tear Repair Healing as an Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging

PURPOSE: To assess the healing of horizontal cleavage tears of the meniscus 1 year after surgical repair and to determine what modality is best to determine healing. METHODS: Patients were prospectively followed for 12 months after surgical meniscus repair using a circumferential compression stitch....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DiBartola, Alex C., Rogers, Alan, Kurzweil, Peter, Knopp, Michael V., Flanigan, David C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.08.003
_version_ 1784618511613558784
author DiBartola, Alex C.
Rogers, Alan
Kurzweil, Peter
Knopp, Michael V.
Flanigan, David C.
author_facet DiBartola, Alex C.
Rogers, Alan
Kurzweil, Peter
Knopp, Michael V.
Flanigan, David C.
author_sort DiBartola, Alex C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the healing of horizontal cleavage tears of the meniscus 1 year after surgical repair and to determine what modality is best to determine healing. METHODS: Patients were prospectively followed for 12 months after surgical meniscus repair using a circumferential compression stitch. Inclusion criteria were preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of horizontal cleavage tear, age between 18 and 50 years, and no concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patients were excluded if they were >50 years old, had a meniscus tear pattern other than horizontal cleavage tear, and underwent concomitant ligament reconstruction. MRIs were performed 1-year postoperatively for evaluation of repair healing. Preoperative and postoperative MRIs of tears were evaluated blindly by a musculoskeletal radiologist. In-office needle arthroscopy was performed at 6 months post-operatively. RESULTS: Eight patients were included and had surgery between March 2016 and November 2017. There were 4 medial and 4 lateral meniscus tears. No patients had recurrence of preoperative symptoms or evidence of retear. Six repairs evaluated by in-office needle (at 5.9 months postsurgery) arthroscopy demonstrated complete healing. Seven of the 8 patients had grade III changes on preoperative MRI, and 1 patient had grade IIc changes. On postoperative MRI, 5 of 7 patients had grade III changes, 1 patient had IIc changes, and 1 had IIb changes. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with grade III changes preoperatively compared with postoperatively (P = .57). One of 8 patients with preoperative MRIs demonstrated extrusion where no patients demonstrate postoperative MRI evidence of extrusion (P = .47). CONCLUSIONS: Horizontal cleavage meniscal tears repaired with a circumferential compression stitch demonstrate healing on in-office needle arthroscopy 6 months after surgery. No evidence of incomplete or failed healing was found. MRI at 1 year after surgery demonstrated residual tear evidence for all patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, therapeutic case series.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8689239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86892392021-12-30 In-Office Needle Arthroscopy Can Evaluate Meniscus Tear Repair Healing as an Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging DiBartola, Alex C. Rogers, Alan Kurzweil, Peter Knopp, Michael V. Flanigan, David C. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To assess the healing of horizontal cleavage tears of the meniscus 1 year after surgical repair and to determine what modality is best to determine healing. METHODS: Patients were prospectively followed for 12 months after surgical meniscus repair using a circumferential compression stitch. Inclusion criteria were preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of horizontal cleavage tear, age between 18 and 50 years, and no concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patients were excluded if they were >50 years old, had a meniscus tear pattern other than horizontal cleavage tear, and underwent concomitant ligament reconstruction. MRIs were performed 1-year postoperatively for evaluation of repair healing. Preoperative and postoperative MRIs of tears were evaluated blindly by a musculoskeletal radiologist. In-office needle arthroscopy was performed at 6 months post-operatively. RESULTS: Eight patients were included and had surgery between March 2016 and November 2017. There were 4 medial and 4 lateral meniscus tears. No patients had recurrence of preoperative symptoms or evidence of retear. Six repairs evaluated by in-office needle (at 5.9 months postsurgery) arthroscopy demonstrated complete healing. Seven of the 8 patients had grade III changes on preoperative MRI, and 1 patient had grade IIc changes. On postoperative MRI, 5 of 7 patients had grade III changes, 1 patient had IIc changes, and 1 had IIb changes. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with grade III changes preoperatively compared with postoperatively (P = .57). One of 8 patients with preoperative MRIs demonstrated extrusion where no patients demonstrate postoperative MRI evidence of extrusion (P = .47). CONCLUSIONS: Horizontal cleavage meniscal tears repaired with a circumferential compression stitch demonstrate healing on in-office needle arthroscopy 6 months after surgery. No evidence of incomplete or failed healing was found. MRI at 1 year after surgery demonstrated residual tear evidence for all patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, therapeutic case series. Elsevier 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8689239/ /pubmed/34977630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.08.003 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
DiBartola, Alex C.
Rogers, Alan
Kurzweil, Peter
Knopp, Michael V.
Flanigan, David C.
In-Office Needle Arthroscopy Can Evaluate Meniscus Tear Repair Healing as an Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title In-Office Needle Arthroscopy Can Evaluate Meniscus Tear Repair Healing as an Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full In-Office Needle Arthroscopy Can Evaluate Meniscus Tear Repair Healing as an Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr In-Office Needle Arthroscopy Can Evaluate Meniscus Tear Repair Healing as an Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed In-Office Needle Arthroscopy Can Evaluate Meniscus Tear Repair Healing as an Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short In-Office Needle Arthroscopy Can Evaluate Meniscus Tear Repair Healing as an Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort in-office needle arthroscopy can evaluate meniscus tear repair healing as an alternative to magnetic resonance imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.08.003
work_keys_str_mv AT dibartolaalexc inofficeneedlearthroscopycanevaluatemeniscustearrepairhealingasanalternativetomagneticresonanceimaging
AT rogersalan inofficeneedlearthroscopycanevaluatemeniscustearrepairhealingasanalternativetomagneticresonanceimaging
AT kurzweilpeter inofficeneedlearthroscopycanevaluatemeniscustearrepairhealingasanalternativetomagneticresonanceimaging
AT knoppmichaelv inofficeneedlearthroscopycanevaluatemeniscustearrepairhealingasanalternativetomagneticresonanceimaging
AT flanigandavidc inofficeneedlearthroscopycanevaluatemeniscustearrepairhealingasanalternativetomagneticresonanceimaging