Cargando…
Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model
PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanical efficacy of medial meniscal ramp lesion (MMRL) repair in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction regarding the graft protection effect after cyclic loading. METHODS: Specimens were randomized into 2 groups: (1) ACL reconstruction with unaddressed MMR...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.019 |
_version_ | 1784618515423035392 |
---|---|
author | Matsumoto, Yuta Takahashi, Tsuneari Hatayama, Kazuhisa Kubo, Tatsuya Higuchi, Hiroshi Kimura, Masashi Takeshita, Katsushi |
author_facet | Matsumoto, Yuta Takahashi, Tsuneari Hatayama, Kazuhisa Kubo, Tatsuya Higuchi, Hiroshi Kimura, Masashi Takeshita, Katsushi |
author_sort | Matsumoto, Yuta |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanical efficacy of medial meniscal ramp lesion (MMRL) repair in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction regarding the graft protection effect after cyclic loading. METHODS: Specimens were randomized into 2 groups: (1) ACL reconstruction with unaddressed MMRL (Group U; n = 10), and (2) ACL reconstruction with repaired MMRL (Group R; n = 12). The specimens were tested cyclically (2,000 cycles, 0-40 N, 100 mm/min) in the direction of the native ACL and loaded to failure (100 mm/min) on a tensile tester. Statistically significant differences between the structural properties (length changes and anterior translations at the 100th, 500th, 1,000th, 1,500th, and 2,000th cycles, upper yield load, maximum load, linear stiffness, and elongation at failure) under cyclic loading and single-cycle loading were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in length changes and anterior translations at the 100th, 500th, 1,000th, 1,500th, and 2,000th cycles. There were no significant differences in upper yield load (82.4 ± 31.2 N in Group U, 90.0 ± 38.5 N in Group R, P = .62), maximum load (109.9 ± 28.6 N in Group U, 124.0 ± 56.4 N in Group R, P = .48), linear stiffness (12.1 ± 4.7N/mm in Group U, 12.5 ± 4.3 N/mm in Group R, P = .84), or elongation at failure (13.5 ± 7.3 mm in Group U, 16.6 ± 7.5 mm in Group R, P = .30). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous MMRL repair at the time of ACL reconstruction did not decrease length changes and anterior translations during cyclic loading. In addition, simultaneous MMRL repair at the time of ACL reconstruction did not contribute to better postoperative structural properties. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Simultaneous MMRL repair at the time of ACL reconstruction does not show a graft protective effect after cyclic loading. Graft elongation may occur during early rehabilitation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8689255 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86892552021-12-30 Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model Matsumoto, Yuta Takahashi, Tsuneari Hatayama, Kazuhisa Kubo, Tatsuya Higuchi, Hiroshi Kimura, Masashi Takeshita, Katsushi Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanical efficacy of medial meniscal ramp lesion (MMRL) repair in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction regarding the graft protection effect after cyclic loading. METHODS: Specimens were randomized into 2 groups: (1) ACL reconstruction with unaddressed MMRL (Group U; n = 10), and (2) ACL reconstruction with repaired MMRL (Group R; n = 12). The specimens were tested cyclically (2,000 cycles, 0-40 N, 100 mm/min) in the direction of the native ACL and loaded to failure (100 mm/min) on a tensile tester. Statistically significant differences between the structural properties (length changes and anterior translations at the 100th, 500th, 1,000th, 1,500th, and 2,000th cycles, upper yield load, maximum load, linear stiffness, and elongation at failure) under cyclic loading and single-cycle loading were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in length changes and anterior translations at the 100th, 500th, 1,000th, 1,500th, and 2,000th cycles. There were no significant differences in upper yield load (82.4 ± 31.2 N in Group U, 90.0 ± 38.5 N in Group R, P = .62), maximum load (109.9 ± 28.6 N in Group U, 124.0 ± 56.4 N in Group R, P = .48), linear stiffness (12.1 ± 4.7N/mm in Group U, 12.5 ± 4.3 N/mm in Group R, P = .84), or elongation at failure (13.5 ± 7.3 mm in Group U, 16.6 ± 7.5 mm in Group R, P = .30). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous MMRL repair at the time of ACL reconstruction did not decrease length changes and anterior translations during cyclic loading. In addition, simultaneous MMRL repair at the time of ACL reconstruction did not contribute to better postoperative structural properties. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Simultaneous MMRL repair at the time of ACL reconstruction does not show a graft protective effect after cyclic loading. Graft elongation may occur during early rehabilitation. Elsevier 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8689255/ /pubmed/34977655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.019 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Matsumoto, Yuta Takahashi, Tsuneari Hatayama, Kazuhisa Kubo, Tatsuya Higuchi, Hiroshi Kimura, Masashi Takeshita, Katsushi Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model |
title | Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model |
title_full | Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model |
title_fullStr | Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model |
title_short | Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model |
title_sort | medial meniscal ramp lesion repair concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction did not contribute to better anterior knee stability and structural properties after cyclic loading: a porcine model |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsumotoyuta medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel AT takahashitsuneari medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel AT hatayamakazuhisa medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel AT kubotatsuya medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel AT higuchihiroshi medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel AT kimuramasashi medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel AT takeshitakatsushi medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel |