Cargando…

Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model

PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanical efficacy of medial meniscal ramp lesion (MMRL) repair in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction regarding the graft protection effect after cyclic loading. METHODS: Specimens were randomized into 2 groups: (1) ACL reconstruction with unaddressed MMR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsumoto, Yuta, Takahashi, Tsuneari, Hatayama, Kazuhisa, Kubo, Tatsuya, Higuchi, Hiroshi, Kimura, Masashi, Takeshita, Katsushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.019
_version_ 1784618515423035392
author Matsumoto, Yuta
Takahashi, Tsuneari
Hatayama, Kazuhisa
Kubo, Tatsuya
Higuchi, Hiroshi
Kimura, Masashi
Takeshita, Katsushi
author_facet Matsumoto, Yuta
Takahashi, Tsuneari
Hatayama, Kazuhisa
Kubo, Tatsuya
Higuchi, Hiroshi
Kimura, Masashi
Takeshita, Katsushi
author_sort Matsumoto, Yuta
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanical efficacy of medial meniscal ramp lesion (MMRL) repair in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction regarding the graft protection effect after cyclic loading. METHODS: Specimens were randomized into 2 groups: (1) ACL reconstruction with unaddressed MMRL (Group U; n = 10), and (2) ACL reconstruction with repaired MMRL (Group R; n = 12). The specimens were tested cyclically (2,000 cycles, 0-40 N, 100 mm/min) in the direction of the native ACL and loaded to failure (100 mm/min) on a tensile tester. Statistically significant differences between the structural properties (length changes and anterior translations at the 100th, 500th, 1,000th, 1,500th, and 2,000th cycles, upper yield load, maximum load, linear stiffness, and elongation at failure) under cyclic loading and single-cycle loading were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in length changes and anterior translations at the 100th, 500th, 1,000th, 1,500th, and 2,000th cycles. There were no significant differences in upper yield load (82.4 ± 31.2 N in Group U, 90.0 ± 38.5 N in Group R, P = .62), maximum load (109.9 ± 28.6 N in Group U, 124.0 ± 56.4 N in Group R, P = .48), linear stiffness (12.1 ± 4.7N/mm in Group U, 12.5 ± 4.3 N/mm in Group R, P = .84), or elongation at failure (13.5 ± 7.3 mm in Group U, 16.6 ± 7.5 mm in Group R, P = .30). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous MMRL repair at the time of ACL reconstruction did not decrease length changes and anterior translations during cyclic loading. In addition, simultaneous MMRL repair at the time of ACL reconstruction did not contribute to better postoperative structural properties. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Simultaneous MMRL repair at the time of ACL reconstruction does not show a graft protective effect after cyclic loading. Graft elongation may occur during early rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8689255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86892552021-12-30 Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model Matsumoto, Yuta Takahashi, Tsuneari Hatayama, Kazuhisa Kubo, Tatsuya Higuchi, Hiroshi Kimura, Masashi Takeshita, Katsushi Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanical efficacy of medial meniscal ramp lesion (MMRL) repair in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction regarding the graft protection effect after cyclic loading. METHODS: Specimens were randomized into 2 groups: (1) ACL reconstruction with unaddressed MMRL (Group U; n = 10), and (2) ACL reconstruction with repaired MMRL (Group R; n = 12). The specimens were tested cyclically (2,000 cycles, 0-40 N, 100 mm/min) in the direction of the native ACL and loaded to failure (100 mm/min) on a tensile tester. Statistically significant differences between the structural properties (length changes and anterior translations at the 100th, 500th, 1,000th, 1,500th, and 2,000th cycles, upper yield load, maximum load, linear stiffness, and elongation at failure) under cyclic loading and single-cycle loading were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in length changes and anterior translations at the 100th, 500th, 1,000th, 1,500th, and 2,000th cycles. There were no significant differences in upper yield load (82.4 ± 31.2 N in Group U, 90.0 ± 38.5 N in Group R, P = .62), maximum load (109.9 ± 28.6 N in Group U, 124.0 ± 56.4 N in Group R, P = .48), linear stiffness (12.1 ± 4.7N/mm in Group U, 12.5 ± 4.3 N/mm in Group R, P = .84), or elongation at failure (13.5 ± 7.3 mm in Group U, 16.6 ± 7.5 mm in Group R, P = .30). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous MMRL repair at the time of ACL reconstruction did not decrease length changes and anterior translations during cyclic loading. In addition, simultaneous MMRL repair at the time of ACL reconstruction did not contribute to better postoperative structural properties. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Simultaneous MMRL repair at the time of ACL reconstruction does not show a graft protective effect after cyclic loading. Graft elongation may occur during early rehabilitation. Elsevier 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8689255/ /pubmed/34977655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.019 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Matsumoto, Yuta
Takahashi, Tsuneari
Hatayama, Kazuhisa
Kubo, Tatsuya
Higuchi, Hiroshi
Kimura, Masashi
Takeshita, Katsushi
Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model
title Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model
title_full Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model
title_fullStr Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model
title_full_unstemmed Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model
title_short Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Contribute to Better Anterior Knee Stability and Structural Properties After Cyclic Loading: A Porcine Model
title_sort medial meniscal ramp lesion repair concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction did not contribute to better anterior knee stability and structural properties after cyclic loading: a porcine model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.019
work_keys_str_mv AT matsumotoyuta medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel
AT takahashitsuneari medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel
AT hatayamakazuhisa medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel
AT kubotatsuya medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel
AT higuchihiroshi medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel
AT kimuramasashi medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel
AT takeshitakatsushi medialmeniscalramplesionrepairconcomitantwithanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructiondidnotcontributetobetteranteriorkneestabilityandstructuralpropertiesaftercyclicloadingaporcinemodel