Cargando…

Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals

IMPORTANCE: In October 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services began requiring US hospitals to report adherence to the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of SEP-1 implementation with sepsis treatment patterns and outc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhee, Chanu, Yu, Tingting, Wang, Rui, Kadri, Sameer S., Fram, David, Chen, Huai-Chun, Klompas, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34928358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38596
_version_ 1784618545689133056
author Rhee, Chanu
Yu, Tingting
Wang, Rui
Kadri, Sameer S.
Fram, David
Chen, Huai-Chun
Klompas, Michael
author_facet Rhee, Chanu
Yu, Tingting
Wang, Rui
Kadri, Sameer S.
Fram, David
Chen, Huai-Chun
Klompas, Michael
author_sort Rhee, Chanu
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: In October 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services began requiring US hospitals to report adherence to the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of SEP-1 implementation with sepsis treatment patterns and outcomes in diverse hospitals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study with interrupted time-series analysis and logistic regression models was conducted among adults admitted to 114 hospitals from October 2013 to December 2017 with suspected sepsis (blood culture orders, ≥2 systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, and acute organ dysfunction) within 24 hours of hospital arrival. Data analysis was conducted from September 2020 to September 2021. EXPOSURES: SEP-1 implementation in the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was quarterly rates of risk-adjusted short-term mortality (in-hospital death or discharge to hospice). Secondary outcomes included lactate testing and administration of anti–methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or antipseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics within 24 hours of hospital arrival. Generalized estimating equations with robust sandwich variances were used to fit logistic regression models to assess for changes in level or trends in these outcomes, adjusting for baseline characteristics and severity of illness. RESULTS: The cohort included 117 510 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 years [55-78] years; 60 530 [51.5%] men and 56 980 [48.5%] women) with suspected sepsis. Lactate testing rates increased from 55.1% (95% CI, 53.9%-56.2%) in Q4 of 2013 to 76.7% (95% CI, 75.4%-78.0%) in Q4 of 2017, with a significant level change following SEP-1 implementation (odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04-1.74). There were increases in use of anti-MRSA antibiotics (19.8% [95% CI, 18.9%-20.7%] in Q4 of 2013 to 26.3% [95% CI, 24.9%-27.7%] in Q4 of 2017) and antipseudomonal antibiotics (27.7% [95% CI, 26.7%-28.8%] in Q4 of 2013 to 40.5% [95% CI, 38.9%-42.0%] in Q4 of 2017), but these trends preceded SEP-1 and did not change with SEP-1 implementation. Unadjusted short-term mortality rates were similar in the pre–SEP-1 period (Q4 of 2013 through Q3 of 2015) vs the post–SEP-1 period (Q1 of 2016 through Q4 of 2017) (20.3% [95% CI, 20.0%-20.6%] vs 20.4% [95% CI, 20.1%-20.7%]), and SEP-1 implementation was not associated with changes in level (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.68-1.29) or trend (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.04) for risk-adjusted short-term mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, SEP-1 implementation was associated with an immediate increase in lactate testing rates, no change in already-increasing rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic use, and no change in short-term mortality rates for patients with suspected sepsis. Other approaches to decrease sepsis mortality may be warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8689388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86893882022-01-05 Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals Rhee, Chanu Yu, Tingting Wang, Rui Kadri, Sameer S. Fram, David Chen, Huai-Chun Klompas, Michael JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: In October 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services began requiring US hospitals to report adherence to the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of SEP-1 implementation with sepsis treatment patterns and outcomes in diverse hospitals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study with interrupted time-series analysis and logistic regression models was conducted among adults admitted to 114 hospitals from October 2013 to December 2017 with suspected sepsis (blood culture orders, ≥2 systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, and acute organ dysfunction) within 24 hours of hospital arrival. Data analysis was conducted from September 2020 to September 2021. EXPOSURES: SEP-1 implementation in the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was quarterly rates of risk-adjusted short-term mortality (in-hospital death or discharge to hospice). Secondary outcomes included lactate testing and administration of anti–methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or antipseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics within 24 hours of hospital arrival. Generalized estimating equations with robust sandwich variances were used to fit logistic regression models to assess for changes in level or trends in these outcomes, adjusting for baseline characteristics and severity of illness. RESULTS: The cohort included 117 510 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 years [55-78] years; 60 530 [51.5%] men and 56 980 [48.5%] women) with suspected sepsis. Lactate testing rates increased from 55.1% (95% CI, 53.9%-56.2%) in Q4 of 2013 to 76.7% (95% CI, 75.4%-78.0%) in Q4 of 2017, with a significant level change following SEP-1 implementation (odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04-1.74). There were increases in use of anti-MRSA antibiotics (19.8% [95% CI, 18.9%-20.7%] in Q4 of 2013 to 26.3% [95% CI, 24.9%-27.7%] in Q4 of 2017) and antipseudomonal antibiotics (27.7% [95% CI, 26.7%-28.8%] in Q4 of 2013 to 40.5% [95% CI, 38.9%-42.0%] in Q4 of 2017), but these trends preceded SEP-1 and did not change with SEP-1 implementation. Unadjusted short-term mortality rates were similar in the pre–SEP-1 period (Q4 of 2013 through Q3 of 2015) vs the post–SEP-1 period (Q1 of 2016 through Q4 of 2017) (20.3% [95% CI, 20.0%-20.6%] vs 20.4% [95% CI, 20.1%-20.7%]), and SEP-1 implementation was not associated with changes in level (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.68-1.29) or trend (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.04) for risk-adjusted short-term mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, SEP-1 implementation was associated with an immediate increase in lactate testing rates, no change in already-increasing rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic use, and no change in short-term mortality rates for patients with suspected sepsis. Other approaches to decrease sepsis mortality may be warranted. American Medical Association 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8689388/ /pubmed/34928358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38596 Text en Copyright 2021 Rhee C et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Rhee, Chanu
Yu, Tingting
Wang, Rui
Kadri, Sameer S.
Fram, David
Chen, Huai-Chun
Klompas, Michael
Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals
title Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals
title_full Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals
title_fullStr Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals
title_short Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals
title_sort association between implementation of the severe sepsis and septic shock early management bundle performance measure and outcomes in patients with suspected sepsis in us hospitals
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34928358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38596
work_keys_str_mv AT rheechanu associationbetweenimplementationoftheseveresepsisandsepticshockearlymanagementbundleperformancemeasureandoutcomesinpatientswithsuspectedsepsisinushospitals
AT yutingting associationbetweenimplementationoftheseveresepsisandsepticshockearlymanagementbundleperformancemeasureandoutcomesinpatientswithsuspectedsepsisinushospitals
AT wangrui associationbetweenimplementationoftheseveresepsisandsepticshockearlymanagementbundleperformancemeasureandoutcomesinpatientswithsuspectedsepsisinushospitals
AT kadrisameers associationbetweenimplementationoftheseveresepsisandsepticshockearlymanagementbundleperformancemeasureandoutcomesinpatientswithsuspectedsepsisinushospitals
AT framdavid associationbetweenimplementationoftheseveresepsisandsepticshockearlymanagementbundleperformancemeasureandoutcomesinpatientswithsuspectedsepsisinushospitals
AT chenhuaichun associationbetweenimplementationoftheseveresepsisandsepticshockearlymanagementbundleperformancemeasureandoutcomesinpatientswithsuspectedsepsisinushospitals
AT klompasmichael associationbetweenimplementationoftheseveresepsisandsepticshockearlymanagementbundleperformancemeasureandoutcomesinpatientswithsuspectedsepsisinushospitals