Cargando…

Keratoconus and Visual Performance with Different Contact Lenses

PURPOSE: To analyze the visual performance in contact lens wearers with keratoconus. METHODS: A retrospective study including contact lens (CL) wearers was performed. The current best-corrected visual acuity with contact lens (BCVA-CL) and with spectacles (BCVA-S) correction, contrast sensitivity (C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marta, Ana, Marques, João Heitor, Almeida, Daniel, José, Diana, Barbosa, Irene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34949911
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S345154
_version_ 1784618581000978432
author Marta, Ana
Marques, João Heitor
Almeida, Daniel
José, Diana
Barbosa, Irene
author_facet Marta, Ana
Marques, João Heitor
Almeida, Daniel
José, Diana
Barbosa, Irene
author_sort Marta, Ana
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To analyze the visual performance in contact lens wearers with keratoconus. METHODS: A retrospective study including contact lens (CL) wearers was performed. The current best-corrected visual acuity with contact lens (BCVA-CL) and with spectacles (BCVA-S) correction, contrast sensitivity (CS) (by Metrovision-MonPack3(®)), analysis of light scattering in the retina and vision break-up time (HD Analyzer(®)), and corneal tomography (Oculus Pentacam(®) HR) were evaluated. RESULTS: This study included 96 eyes of 59 patients with Keratoconus. Rigid gas permeable contact lenses (RGPCL), hybrid contact lenses (HCL), and silicone hydrogel/hydrogel contact lenses (HGCL) were fitted in 67, 17, and 12 eyes, respectively. Dynamic objective scatter index (OSI) (p = 0.024), minimum OSI (p = 0.037) and maximum OSI (p = 0.040) were significantly better with RGPCL and worse with HGCL. Mean CS in photopic conditions was significantly worse with HGCL and better with HCL (p = 0.006), without differences in mesopic conditions (p = 0.121). RGPCL wearers showed a higher mean K (p = 0.020), and a lower corneal thickness at the thinnest point (p=0.011). CONCLUSION: Visual quality varied significantly with different types of CL. Although RGPCL was fitted in patients with worse Pentacam tomographic parameters, RGPCL was associated with a better dynamic visual quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8689658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86896582021-12-22 Keratoconus and Visual Performance with Different Contact Lenses Marta, Ana Marques, João Heitor Almeida, Daniel José, Diana Barbosa, Irene Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To analyze the visual performance in contact lens wearers with keratoconus. METHODS: A retrospective study including contact lens (CL) wearers was performed. The current best-corrected visual acuity with contact lens (BCVA-CL) and with spectacles (BCVA-S) correction, contrast sensitivity (CS) (by Metrovision-MonPack3(®)), analysis of light scattering in the retina and vision break-up time (HD Analyzer(®)), and corneal tomography (Oculus Pentacam(®) HR) were evaluated. RESULTS: This study included 96 eyes of 59 patients with Keratoconus. Rigid gas permeable contact lenses (RGPCL), hybrid contact lenses (HCL), and silicone hydrogel/hydrogel contact lenses (HGCL) were fitted in 67, 17, and 12 eyes, respectively. Dynamic objective scatter index (OSI) (p = 0.024), minimum OSI (p = 0.037) and maximum OSI (p = 0.040) were significantly better with RGPCL and worse with HGCL. Mean CS in photopic conditions was significantly worse with HGCL and better with HCL (p = 0.006), without differences in mesopic conditions (p = 0.121). RGPCL wearers showed a higher mean K (p = 0.020), and a lower corneal thickness at the thinnest point (p=0.011). CONCLUSION: Visual quality varied significantly with different types of CL. Although RGPCL was fitted in patients with worse Pentacam tomographic parameters, RGPCL was associated with a better dynamic visual quality. Dove 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8689658/ /pubmed/34949911 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S345154 Text en © 2021 Marta et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Marta, Ana
Marques, João Heitor
Almeida, Daniel
José, Diana
Barbosa, Irene
Keratoconus and Visual Performance with Different Contact Lenses
title Keratoconus and Visual Performance with Different Contact Lenses
title_full Keratoconus and Visual Performance with Different Contact Lenses
title_fullStr Keratoconus and Visual Performance with Different Contact Lenses
title_full_unstemmed Keratoconus and Visual Performance with Different Contact Lenses
title_short Keratoconus and Visual Performance with Different Contact Lenses
title_sort keratoconus and visual performance with different contact lenses
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34949911
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S345154
work_keys_str_mv AT martaana keratoconusandvisualperformancewithdifferentcontactlenses
AT marquesjoaoheitor keratoconusandvisualperformancewithdifferentcontactlenses
AT almeidadaniel keratoconusandvisualperformancewithdifferentcontactlenses
AT josediana keratoconusandvisualperformancewithdifferentcontactlenses
AT barbosairene keratoconusandvisualperformancewithdifferentcontactlenses