Cargando…
Interim analysis of the COSA (COVID-19 patients treated with the Seraph(®) 100 Microbind(®) Affinity filter) registry
BACKGROUND: The Seraph(®) 100 Microbind(®) Affinity Blood Filter is a haemoperfusion device that is licensed for the reduction of pathogens, including several viruses, in the blood. It received Emergency Use Authorization for the treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by the Food an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34875087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfab347 |
_version_ | 1784618592858275840 |
---|---|
author | Schmidt, Julius J Borchina, Dan Nicolae van't Klooster, Mariet Bulhan-Soki, Khalida Okioma, Reuben Herbst, Larissa Rodríguez, Diego Sandoval Premužić, Vedran Büttner, Stefan Bader, Birgit Serednicki, Wojciech Zasada, Ewa Schmitz, Michael Quabach, Ralf A Hrincheva, Maria Fühner, Thomas Kielstein, Jan T |
author_facet | Schmidt, Julius J Borchina, Dan Nicolae van't Klooster, Mariet Bulhan-Soki, Khalida Okioma, Reuben Herbst, Larissa Rodríguez, Diego Sandoval Premužić, Vedran Büttner, Stefan Bader, Birgit Serednicki, Wojciech Zasada, Ewa Schmitz, Michael Quabach, Ralf A Hrincheva, Maria Fühner, Thomas Kielstein, Jan T |
author_sort | Schmidt, Julius J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Seraph(®) 100 Microbind(®) Affinity Blood Filter is a haemoperfusion device that is licensed for the reduction of pathogens, including several viruses, in the blood. It received Emergency Use Authorization for the treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Several studies have shown that the blood viral load of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) correlates with adverse outcomes and removal of the nucleocapsid of the SARS-CoV-2 virus by the Seraph(®) 100 has been recently demonstrated. The aim of this registry was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Seraph(®) 100 treatment for COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Twelve hospitals from six countries representing two continents documented patient and treatment characteristics as well as outcome parameters without reimbursement. Additionally, mortality and safety results of the device were reported. A total of 102 treatment sessions in 82 patients were documented in the registry. Four patients were excluded from mortality analysis due to incomplete outcome data, which were available in the other 78 patients. RESULTS: Overall, a 30-day mortality rate of 46.2% in the 78 patients with complete follow-up was reported. The median treatment time was 5.00 h (4.00–13.42) and 43.1% of the treatments were performed as haemoperfusion only. Adverse events of the Seraph(®) 100 treatment were reported in 8.8% of the 102 treatments and represented the premature end of treatment due to circuit failure. Patients who died were treated later in their intensive care unit (ICU) stay and onset of COVID symptoms. They also had higher ferritin levels. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that delayed Seraph(®) 100 treatment after ICU admission (>60 h), as well as bacterial superinfection, were associated with mortality. While average predicted mortality rate according to Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in ICU patients was 56.7%, the observed mortality was 50.7%. In non-ICU patients, Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (4C) score average predicted a mortality rate of 38.0%, while the observed mortality rate was 11.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of COVID-19 patients with Seraph(®) 100 is well tolerated and the circuit failure rate was lower than previously reported for kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in COVID-19 patients. Mortality correlated with late initiation of Seraph treatment after ICU admission and bacterial superinfection. Compared with predicted mortality according to 4C and SOFA scores, mortality of Seraph(®) 100-treated patients reported in the registry was lower. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8689741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86897412022-01-05 Interim analysis of the COSA (COVID-19 patients treated with the Seraph(®) 100 Microbind(®) Affinity filter) registry Schmidt, Julius J Borchina, Dan Nicolae van't Klooster, Mariet Bulhan-Soki, Khalida Okioma, Reuben Herbst, Larissa Rodríguez, Diego Sandoval Premužić, Vedran Büttner, Stefan Bader, Birgit Serednicki, Wojciech Zasada, Ewa Schmitz, Michael Quabach, Ralf A Hrincheva, Maria Fühner, Thomas Kielstein, Jan T Nephrol Dial Transplant Original Article BACKGROUND: The Seraph(®) 100 Microbind(®) Affinity Blood Filter is a haemoperfusion device that is licensed for the reduction of pathogens, including several viruses, in the blood. It received Emergency Use Authorization for the treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Several studies have shown that the blood viral load of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) correlates with adverse outcomes and removal of the nucleocapsid of the SARS-CoV-2 virus by the Seraph(®) 100 has been recently demonstrated. The aim of this registry was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Seraph(®) 100 treatment for COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Twelve hospitals from six countries representing two continents documented patient and treatment characteristics as well as outcome parameters without reimbursement. Additionally, mortality and safety results of the device were reported. A total of 102 treatment sessions in 82 patients were documented in the registry. Four patients were excluded from mortality analysis due to incomplete outcome data, which were available in the other 78 patients. RESULTS: Overall, a 30-day mortality rate of 46.2% in the 78 patients with complete follow-up was reported. The median treatment time was 5.00 h (4.00–13.42) and 43.1% of the treatments were performed as haemoperfusion only. Adverse events of the Seraph(®) 100 treatment were reported in 8.8% of the 102 treatments and represented the premature end of treatment due to circuit failure. Patients who died were treated later in their intensive care unit (ICU) stay and onset of COVID symptoms. They also had higher ferritin levels. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that delayed Seraph(®) 100 treatment after ICU admission (>60 h), as well as bacterial superinfection, were associated with mortality. While average predicted mortality rate according to Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in ICU patients was 56.7%, the observed mortality was 50.7%. In non-ICU patients, Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (4C) score average predicted a mortality rate of 38.0%, while the observed mortality rate was 11.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of COVID-19 patients with Seraph(®) 100 is well tolerated and the circuit failure rate was lower than previously reported for kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in COVID-19 patients. Mortality correlated with late initiation of Seraph treatment after ICU admission and bacterial superinfection. Compared with predicted mortality according to 4C and SOFA scores, mortality of Seraph(®) 100-treated patients reported in the registry was lower. Oxford University Press 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8689741/ /pubmed/34875087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfab347 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Schmidt, Julius J Borchina, Dan Nicolae van't Klooster, Mariet Bulhan-Soki, Khalida Okioma, Reuben Herbst, Larissa Rodríguez, Diego Sandoval Premužić, Vedran Büttner, Stefan Bader, Birgit Serednicki, Wojciech Zasada, Ewa Schmitz, Michael Quabach, Ralf A Hrincheva, Maria Fühner, Thomas Kielstein, Jan T Interim analysis of the COSA (COVID-19 patients treated with the Seraph(®) 100 Microbind(®) Affinity filter) registry |
title | Interim analysis of the COSA (COVID-19 patients treated with the Seraph(®) 100 Microbind(®) Affinity filter) registry |
title_full | Interim analysis of the COSA (COVID-19 patients treated with the Seraph(®) 100 Microbind(®) Affinity filter) registry |
title_fullStr | Interim analysis of the COSA (COVID-19 patients treated with the Seraph(®) 100 Microbind(®) Affinity filter) registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Interim analysis of the COSA (COVID-19 patients treated with the Seraph(®) 100 Microbind(®) Affinity filter) registry |
title_short | Interim analysis of the COSA (COVID-19 patients treated with the Seraph(®) 100 Microbind(®) Affinity filter) registry |
title_sort | interim analysis of the cosa (covid-19 patients treated with the seraph(®) 100 microbind(®) affinity filter) registry |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34875087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfab347 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmidtjuliusj interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT borchinadannicolae interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT vantkloostermariet interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT bulhansokikhalida interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT okiomareuben interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT herbstlarissa interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT rodriguezdiegosandoval interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT premuzicvedran interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT buttnerstefan interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT baderbirgit interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT serednickiwojciech interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT zasadaewa interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT schmitzmichael interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT quabachralfa interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT hrinchevamaria interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT fuhnerthomas interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry AT kielsteinjant interimanalysisofthecosacovid19patientstreatedwiththeseraph100microbindaffinityfilterregistry |