Cargando…

Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians

OBJECTIVES: The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid global transition towards telemedicine; yet much remains unknown about telemedicine’s acceptability and safety in rheumatology. To help address this gap and inform practice, this study investigated rheumatology patient and clinician experiences...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sloan, Melanie, Lever, Elliott, Harwood, Rupert, Gordon, Caroline, Wincup, Chris, Blane, Moira, Brimicombe, James, Lanyon, Peter, Howard, Paul, Sutton, Stephen, D’Cruz, David, Naughton, Felix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34698822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab796
_version_ 1784618596986519552
author Sloan, Melanie
Lever, Elliott
Harwood, Rupert
Gordon, Caroline
Wincup, Chris
Blane, Moira
Brimicombe, James
Lanyon, Peter
Howard, Paul
Sutton, Stephen
D’Cruz, David
Naughton, Felix
author_facet Sloan, Melanie
Lever, Elliott
Harwood, Rupert
Gordon, Caroline
Wincup, Chris
Blane, Moira
Brimicombe, James
Lanyon, Peter
Howard, Paul
Sutton, Stephen
D’Cruz, David
Naughton, Felix
author_sort Sloan, Melanie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid global transition towards telemedicine; yet much remains unknown about telemedicine’s acceptability and safety in rheumatology. To help address this gap and inform practice, this study investigated rheumatology patient and clinician experiences and views of telemedicine. METHODS: Sequential mixed methodology combined analysis of surveys and in-depth interviews. Between and within-group differences in views of telemedicine were examined for patients and clinicians using t-tests. RESULTS: Surveys (patients n = 1340, clinicians n = 111) and interviews (patients n = 31, clinicians n = 29) were completed between April 2021 and July 2021. The majority of patients were from the UK (96%) and had inflammatory arthritis (32%) or lupus (32%). Patients and clinicians rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face consultations in almost all categories, although >60% found it more convenient. Building trusting medical relationships and assessment accuracy were great concerns (93% of clinicians and 86% of patients rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face for assessment accuracy). Telemedicine was perceived to have increased misdiagnoses, inequalities and barriers to accessing care. Participants reported highly disparate telemedicine delivery and responsiveness from primary and secondary care. Although rheumatology clinicians highlighted the importance of a quick response to flaring patients, only 55% of patients were confident that their rheumatology department would respond within 48 hours. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate a preference for face-to-face consultations. Some negative experiences may be due to the pandemic rather than telemedicine specifically, although the risk of greater diagnostic inaccuracies using telemedicine is unlikely to be fully resolved. Training, choice, careful patient selection, and further consultation with clinicians and patients is required to increase telemedicine’s acceptability and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This telemedicine study is part of a pre-registered longitudinal multi-stage trial, the LISTEN study (ISRCTN-14966097), with later Covid-related additions registered in March 2021, including a pre-registered statistical analysis plan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8689882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86898822022-01-05 Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians Sloan, Melanie Lever, Elliott Harwood, Rupert Gordon, Caroline Wincup, Chris Blane, Moira Brimicombe, James Lanyon, Peter Howard, Paul Sutton, Stephen D’Cruz, David Naughton, Felix Rheumatology (Oxford) Clinical Science OBJECTIVES: The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid global transition towards telemedicine; yet much remains unknown about telemedicine’s acceptability and safety in rheumatology. To help address this gap and inform practice, this study investigated rheumatology patient and clinician experiences and views of telemedicine. METHODS: Sequential mixed methodology combined analysis of surveys and in-depth interviews. Between and within-group differences in views of telemedicine were examined for patients and clinicians using t-tests. RESULTS: Surveys (patients n = 1340, clinicians n = 111) and interviews (patients n = 31, clinicians n = 29) were completed between April 2021 and July 2021. The majority of patients were from the UK (96%) and had inflammatory arthritis (32%) or lupus (32%). Patients and clinicians rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face consultations in almost all categories, although >60% found it more convenient. Building trusting medical relationships and assessment accuracy were great concerns (93% of clinicians and 86% of patients rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face for assessment accuracy). Telemedicine was perceived to have increased misdiagnoses, inequalities and barriers to accessing care. Participants reported highly disparate telemedicine delivery and responsiveness from primary and secondary care. Although rheumatology clinicians highlighted the importance of a quick response to flaring patients, only 55% of patients were confident that their rheumatology department would respond within 48 hours. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate a preference for face-to-face consultations. Some negative experiences may be due to the pandemic rather than telemedicine specifically, although the risk of greater diagnostic inaccuracies using telemedicine is unlikely to be fully resolved. Training, choice, careful patient selection, and further consultation with clinicians and patients is required to increase telemedicine’s acceptability and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This telemedicine study is part of a pre-registered longitudinal multi-stage trial, the LISTEN study (ISRCTN-14966097), with later Covid-related additions registered in March 2021, including a pre-registered statistical analysis plan. Oxford University Press 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8689882/ /pubmed/34698822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab796 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Sloan, Melanie
Lever, Elliott
Harwood, Rupert
Gordon, Caroline
Wincup, Chris
Blane, Moira
Brimicombe, James
Lanyon, Peter
Howard, Paul
Sutton, Stephen
D’Cruz, David
Naughton, Felix
Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians
title Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians
title_full Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians
title_fullStr Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians
title_full_unstemmed Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians
title_short Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians
title_sort telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34698822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab796
work_keys_str_mv AT sloanmelanie telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians
AT leverelliott telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians
AT harwoodrupert telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians
AT gordoncaroline telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians
AT wincupchris telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians
AT blanemoira telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians
AT brimicombejames telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians
AT lanyonpeter telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians
AT howardpaul telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians
AT suttonstephen telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians
AT dcruzdavid telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians
AT naughtonfelix telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians