Cargando…
Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians
OBJECTIVES: The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid global transition towards telemedicine; yet much remains unknown about telemedicine’s acceptability and safety in rheumatology. To help address this gap and inform practice, this study investigated rheumatology patient and clinician experiences...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34698822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab796 |
_version_ | 1784618596986519552 |
---|---|
author | Sloan, Melanie Lever, Elliott Harwood, Rupert Gordon, Caroline Wincup, Chris Blane, Moira Brimicombe, James Lanyon, Peter Howard, Paul Sutton, Stephen D’Cruz, David Naughton, Felix |
author_facet | Sloan, Melanie Lever, Elliott Harwood, Rupert Gordon, Caroline Wincup, Chris Blane, Moira Brimicombe, James Lanyon, Peter Howard, Paul Sutton, Stephen D’Cruz, David Naughton, Felix |
author_sort | Sloan, Melanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid global transition towards telemedicine; yet much remains unknown about telemedicine’s acceptability and safety in rheumatology. To help address this gap and inform practice, this study investigated rheumatology patient and clinician experiences and views of telemedicine. METHODS: Sequential mixed methodology combined analysis of surveys and in-depth interviews. Between and within-group differences in views of telemedicine were examined for patients and clinicians using t-tests. RESULTS: Surveys (patients n = 1340, clinicians n = 111) and interviews (patients n = 31, clinicians n = 29) were completed between April 2021 and July 2021. The majority of patients were from the UK (96%) and had inflammatory arthritis (32%) or lupus (32%). Patients and clinicians rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face consultations in almost all categories, although >60% found it more convenient. Building trusting medical relationships and assessment accuracy were great concerns (93% of clinicians and 86% of patients rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face for assessment accuracy). Telemedicine was perceived to have increased misdiagnoses, inequalities and barriers to accessing care. Participants reported highly disparate telemedicine delivery and responsiveness from primary and secondary care. Although rheumatology clinicians highlighted the importance of a quick response to flaring patients, only 55% of patients were confident that their rheumatology department would respond within 48 hours. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate a preference for face-to-face consultations. Some negative experiences may be due to the pandemic rather than telemedicine specifically, although the risk of greater diagnostic inaccuracies using telemedicine is unlikely to be fully resolved. Training, choice, careful patient selection, and further consultation with clinicians and patients is required to increase telemedicine’s acceptability and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This telemedicine study is part of a pre-registered longitudinal multi-stage trial, the LISTEN study (ISRCTN-14966097), with later Covid-related additions registered in March 2021, including a pre-registered statistical analysis plan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8689882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86898822022-01-05 Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians Sloan, Melanie Lever, Elliott Harwood, Rupert Gordon, Caroline Wincup, Chris Blane, Moira Brimicombe, James Lanyon, Peter Howard, Paul Sutton, Stephen D’Cruz, David Naughton, Felix Rheumatology (Oxford) Clinical Science OBJECTIVES: The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid global transition towards telemedicine; yet much remains unknown about telemedicine’s acceptability and safety in rheumatology. To help address this gap and inform practice, this study investigated rheumatology patient and clinician experiences and views of telemedicine. METHODS: Sequential mixed methodology combined analysis of surveys and in-depth interviews. Between and within-group differences in views of telemedicine were examined for patients and clinicians using t-tests. RESULTS: Surveys (patients n = 1340, clinicians n = 111) and interviews (patients n = 31, clinicians n = 29) were completed between April 2021 and July 2021. The majority of patients were from the UK (96%) and had inflammatory arthritis (32%) or lupus (32%). Patients and clinicians rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face consultations in almost all categories, although >60% found it more convenient. Building trusting medical relationships and assessment accuracy were great concerns (93% of clinicians and 86% of patients rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face for assessment accuracy). Telemedicine was perceived to have increased misdiagnoses, inequalities and barriers to accessing care. Participants reported highly disparate telemedicine delivery and responsiveness from primary and secondary care. Although rheumatology clinicians highlighted the importance of a quick response to flaring patients, only 55% of patients were confident that their rheumatology department would respond within 48 hours. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate a preference for face-to-face consultations. Some negative experiences may be due to the pandemic rather than telemedicine specifically, although the risk of greater diagnostic inaccuracies using telemedicine is unlikely to be fully resolved. Training, choice, careful patient selection, and further consultation with clinicians and patients is required to increase telemedicine’s acceptability and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This telemedicine study is part of a pre-registered longitudinal multi-stage trial, the LISTEN study (ISRCTN-14966097), with later Covid-related additions registered in March 2021, including a pre-registered statistical analysis plan. Oxford University Press 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8689882/ /pubmed/34698822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab796 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Sloan, Melanie Lever, Elliott Harwood, Rupert Gordon, Caroline Wincup, Chris Blane, Moira Brimicombe, James Lanyon, Peter Howard, Paul Sutton, Stephen D’Cruz, David Naughton, Felix Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians |
title | Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians |
title_full | Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians |
title_fullStr | Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians |
title_full_unstemmed | Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians |
title_short | Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians |
title_sort | telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34698822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab796 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sloanmelanie telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians AT leverelliott telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians AT harwoodrupert telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians AT gordoncaroline telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians AT wincupchris telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians AT blanemoira telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians AT brimicombejames telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians AT lanyonpeter telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians AT howardpaul telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians AT suttonstephen telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians AT dcruzdavid telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians AT naughtonfelix telemedicineinrheumatologyamixedmethodsstudyexploringacceptabilitypreferencesandexperiencesamongpatientsandclinicians |