Cargando…

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conventional and biportal endoscopic decompressive laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (ENDO-B trial): a protocol for a prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: Recent studies on biportal endoscopic spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis have reported good clinical results. However, these studies have been limited by the small sample sizes and use of a retrospective study design. Therefore, we aim to compare the efficacy and safet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Hyun-Jin, Park, Sang-Min, Song, Kwang-Sup, Kim, Ho-Joong, Park, Si-Young, Kang, Taewook, Kang, Min-Seok, Heo, Dong-Hwa, Park, Choon-Keun, Lee, Dong-Geun, Hwang, Jin-Sub, Jang, Jae-Won, Kim, Jun-Young, Kim, Jin-Sung, Lee, Hong-Jae, Yoon, Joon-Hyeok, Park, Chang-Won, You, Ki-Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8690338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04959-2
_version_ 1784618633683533824
author Park, Hyun-Jin
Park, Sang-Min
Song, Kwang-Sup
Kim, Ho-Joong
Park, Si-Young
Kang, Taewook
Kang, Min-Seok
Heo, Dong-Hwa
Park, Choon-Keun
Lee, Dong-Geun
Hwang, Jin-Sub
Jang, Jae-Won
Kim, Jun-Young
Kim, Jin-Sung
Lee, Hong-Jae
Yoon, Joon-Hyeok
Park, Chang-Won
You, Ki-Han
author_facet Park, Hyun-Jin
Park, Sang-Min
Song, Kwang-Sup
Kim, Ho-Joong
Park, Si-Young
Kang, Taewook
Kang, Min-Seok
Heo, Dong-Hwa
Park, Choon-Keun
Lee, Dong-Geun
Hwang, Jin-Sub
Jang, Jae-Won
Kim, Jun-Young
Kim, Jin-Sung
Lee, Hong-Jae
Yoon, Joon-Hyeok
Park, Chang-Won
You, Ki-Han
author_sort Park, Hyun-Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent studies on biportal endoscopic spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis have reported good clinical results. However, these studies have been limited by the small sample sizes and use of a retrospective study design. Therefore, we aim to compare the efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic decompressive laminectomy with those of conventional decompressive laminectomy in a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: This study will include 120 patients (60 per group, aged 20–80 years) with 1- or 2-level lumbar spinal stenosis, who will be recruited from six hospitals. The study will be conducted from July 2021 to December 2024. The primary outcome (Oswestry Disability Index at 12 months after surgery) will be evaluated through a modified intention-to-treat method. The secondary outcomes will include the following: visual analog scale score for low back and lower extremity radiating pain, EuroQol 5-dimensions score, surgery satisfaction, walking time, postoperative return to daily life period, postoperative surgical scars, and some surgery-related variables. Radiographic outcomes will be analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. All outcomes will be evaluated before the surgery and at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. This protocol adheres to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines for reporting of clinical trial protocols. DISCUSSION: It is hypothesized that the efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic and conventional decompressive laminectomy will be comparable in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The results of this trial will provide a high level of evidence for the efficacy and safety of the biportal endoscopic technique in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and facilitate the development of clinical practice guidelines. Furthermore, the results of this study may indicate the feasibility of the biportal endoscopic technique for other types of spinal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ENDO-B trial is registered at Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS, cris.nih.go.kr) (KCT0006057; April 52,021).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8690338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86903382021-12-21 Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conventional and biportal endoscopic decompressive laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (ENDO-B trial): a protocol for a prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicenter trial Park, Hyun-Jin Park, Sang-Min Song, Kwang-Sup Kim, Ho-Joong Park, Si-Young Kang, Taewook Kang, Min-Seok Heo, Dong-Hwa Park, Choon-Keun Lee, Dong-Geun Hwang, Jin-Sub Jang, Jae-Won Kim, Jun-Young Kim, Jin-Sung Lee, Hong-Jae Yoon, Joon-Hyeok Park, Chang-Won You, Ki-Han BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Recent studies on biportal endoscopic spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis have reported good clinical results. However, these studies have been limited by the small sample sizes and use of a retrospective study design. Therefore, we aim to compare the efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic decompressive laminectomy with those of conventional decompressive laminectomy in a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: This study will include 120 patients (60 per group, aged 20–80 years) with 1- or 2-level lumbar spinal stenosis, who will be recruited from six hospitals. The study will be conducted from July 2021 to December 2024. The primary outcome (Oswestry Disability Index at 12 months after surgery) will be evaluated through a modified intention-to-treat method. The secondary outcomes will include the following: visual analog scale score for low back and lower extremity radiating pain, EuroQol 5-dimensions score, surgery satisfaction, walking time, postoperative return to daily life period, postoperative surgical scars, and some surgery-related variables. Radiographic outcomes will be analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. All outcomes will be evaluated before the surgery and at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. This protocol adheres to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines for reporting of clinical trial protocols. DISCUSSION: It is hypothesized that the efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic and conventional decompressive laminectomy will be comparable in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The results of this trial will provide a high level of evidence for the efficacy and safety of the biportal endoscopic technique in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and facilitate the development of clinical practice guidelines. Furthermore, the results of this study may indicate the feasibility of the biportal endoscopic technique for other types of spinal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ENDO-B trial is registered at Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS, cris.nih.go.kr) (KCT0006057; April 52,021). BioMed Central 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8690338/ /pubmed/34930222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04959-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Park, Hyun-Jin
Park, Sang-Min
Song, Kwang-Sup
Kim, Ho-Joong
Park, Si-Young
Kang, Taewook
Kang, Min-Seok
Heo, Dong-Hwa
Park, Choon-Keun
Lee, Dong-Geun
Hwang, Jin-Sub
Jang, Jae-Won
Kim, Jun-Young
Kim, Jin-Sung
Lee, Hong-Jae
Yoon, Joon-Hyeok
Park, Chang-Won
You, Ki-Han
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conventional and biportal endoscopic decompressive laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (ENDO-B trial): a protocol for a prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicenter trial
title Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conventional and biportal endoscopic decompressive laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (ENDO-B trial): a protocol for a prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicenter trial
title_full Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conventional and biportal endoscopic decompressive laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (ENDO-B trial): a protocol for a prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicenter trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conventional and biportal endoscopic decompressive laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (ENDO-B trial): a protocol for a prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicenter trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conventional and biportal endoscopic decompressive laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (ENDO-B trial): a protocol for a prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicenter trial
title_short Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conventional and biportal endoscopic decompressive laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (ENDO-B trial): a protocol for a prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicenter trial
title_sort evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conventional and biportal endoscopic decompressive laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (endo-b trial): a protocol for a prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicenter trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8690338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04959-2
work_keys_str_mv AT parkhyunjin evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT parksangmin evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT songkwangsup evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT kimhojoong evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT parksiyoung evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT kangtaewook evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT kangminseok evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT heodonghwa evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT parkchoonkeun evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT leedonggeun evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT hwangjinsub evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT jangjaewon evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT kimjunyoung evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT kimjinsung evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT leehongjae evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT yoonjoonhyeok evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT parkchangwon evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial
AT youkihan evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofconventionalandbiportalendoscopicdecompressivelaminectomyinpatientswithlumbarspinalstenosisendobtrialaprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedassessorblindmulticentertrial