Cargando…

369. Alternative Workflow for SARS-CoV-2 Testing Using a Heat Lysis Protocol for Respiratory Specimens

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has demonstrated the need for streamlined workflows in high-throughput testing. In extraction-based testing, limited extraction reagents and required proprietary instrumentation may pose a bottleneck for labs. As a solution, ChromaCode developed a Direct Extractio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yadav, Meghna, Martinez, Tiffany, Regoli, Isabel, Hernandez, Osvaldo, Le, Phuong, Carolan, Heather, Brown, Brad, Menge, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8690603/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.570
_version_ 1784618671011790848
author Yadav, Meghna
Martinez, Tiffany
Regoli, Isabel
Hernandez, Osvaldo
Le, Phuong
Carolan, Heather
Brown, Brad
Menge, Karen
author_facet Yadav, Meghna
Martinez, Tiffany
Regoli, Isabel
Hernandez, Osvaldo
Le, Phuong
Carolan, Heather
Brown, Brad
Menge, Karen
author_sort Yadav, Meghna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has demonstrated the need for streamlined workflows in high-throughput testing. In extraction-based testing, limited extraction reagents and required proprietary instrumentation may pose a bottleneck for labs. As a solution, ChromaCode developed a Direct Extraction protocol for the HDPCR™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay, distributed in accordance with the guidance on Policy for Coronavirus Disease-2019 Tests During the Public Health Emergency, Section IV.C., which allows for the processing of specimens without an extraction system. In lieu of an extraction system, the Direct Extraction protocol uses a thermal cycler to lyse and inactivate specimens which are directly added to the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). METHODS: The Limit of Detection (LoD), Clinical Performance, and effect of Interfering Substances was determined for the Direct Extraction protocol. The LoD was established on 6 PCR platforms with dilutions of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus spiked into residual, negative nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) matrix. Clinical performance was assessed with 48 positive and 50 negative frozen retrospective samples using the Direct Extraction protocol compared to an external Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) comparator assays (cobas® Liat® SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B assay and the Hologic Panther Fusion® SARS-CoV-2 Assay respectively) on three PCR platforms. The Direct Extraction protocol was evaluated for performance in the presence of 13 potentially interfering substances that can be present in a respiratory specimen. RESULTS: The LoD of the Direct Extraction protocol ranges from 1000 – 3000 genomic equivalents (GE)/mL. The clinical performance of the assay was 95.8% positive agreement (95% CI of 84.6% - 99.3%) and 100% negative agreement (95% CI of 90.9% - 100% or 91.1% – 100%) across all three PCR platforms tested. The viral target was detected at 3X LoD for all interferents tested. CONCLUSION: The Direct Extraction protocol of ChromaCode’s SARS-CoV-2 Assay is a sensitive test that eliminates the need for sample extraction and performs very well against traditional extraction-based workflows. The inclusion of this protocol can reduce costs, reliance on extraction systems, and time associated with extraction-based protocols. DISCLOSURES: Meghna Yadav, Ph.D. Molecular Biology, ChromaCode Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Tiffany Martinez, n/a, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder) Isabel Regoli, MS, Bioinformatics, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder) Osvaldo Hernandez, B.S., Molecular Biology, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder) Phuong Le, B.S., Biochemistry, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder) Heather Carolan, Masters, Computational Molecular Biology, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder) Brad Brown, Ph.D Biomedical Sciences, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder) Karen Menge, Ph.D. Biochemistry, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder)ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8690603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86906032022-01-05 369. Alternative Workflow for SARS-CoV-2 Testing Using a Heat Lysis Protocol for Respiratory Specimens Yadav, Meghna Martinez, Tiffany Regoli, Isabel Hernandez, Osvaldo Le, Phuong Carolan, Heather Brown, Brad Menge, Karen Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has demonstrated the need for streamlined workflows in high-throughput testing. In extraction-based testing, limited extraction reagents and required proprietary instrumentation may pose a bottleneck for labs. As a solution, ChromaCode developed a Direct Extraction protocol for the HDPCR™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay, distributed in accordance with the guidance on Policy for Coronavirus Disease-2019 Tests During the Public Health Emergency, Section IV.C., which allows for the processing of specimens without an extraction system. In lieu of an extraction system, the Direct Extraction protocol uses a thermal cycler to lyse and inactivate specimens which are directly added to the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). METHODS: The Limit of Detection (LoD), Clinical Performance, and effect of Interfering Substances was determined for the Direct Extraction protocol. The LoD was established on 6 PCR platforms with dilutions of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus spiked into residual, negative nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) matrix. Clinical performance was assessed with 48 positive and 50 negative frozen retrospective samples using the Direct Extraction protocol compared to an external Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) comparator assays (cobas® Liat® SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B assay and the Hologic Panther Fusion® SARS-CoV-2 Assay respectively) on three PCR platforms. The Direct Extraction protocol was evaluated for performance in the presence of 13 potentially interfering substances that can be present in a respiratory specimen. RESULTS: The LoD of the Direct Extraction protocol ranges from 1000 – 3000 genomic equivalents (GE)/mL. The clinical performance of the assay was 95.8% positive agreement (95% CI of 84.6% - 99.3%) and 100% negative agreement (95% CI of 90.9% - 100% or 91.1% – 100%) across all three PCR platforms tested. The viral target was detected at 3X LoD for all interferents tested. CONCLUSION: The Direct Extraction protocol of ChromaCode’s SARS-CoV-2 Assay is a sensitive test that eliminates the need for sample extraction and performs very well against traditional extraction-based workflows. The inclusion of this protocol can reduce costs, reliance on extraction systems, and time associated with extraction-based protocols. DISCLOSURES: Meghna Yadav, Ph.D. Molecular Biology, ChromaCode Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Tiffany Martinez, n/a, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder) Isabel Regoli, MS, Bioinformatics, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder) Osvaldo Hernandez, B.S., Molecular Biology, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder) Phuong Le, B.S., Biochemistry, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder) Heather Carolan, Masters, Computational Molecular Biology, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder) Brad Brown, Ph.D Biomedical Sciences, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder) Karen Menge, Ph.D. Biochemistry, ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder)ChromaCode (Employee, Shareholder) Oxford University Press 2021-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8690603/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.570 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Yadav, Meghna
Martinez, Tiffany
Regoli, Isabel
Hernandez, Osvaldo
Le, Phuong
Carolan, Heather
Brown, Brad
Menge, Karen
369. Alternative Workflow for SARS-CoV-2 Testing Using a Heat Lysis Protocol for Respiratory Specimens
title 369. Alternative Workflow for SARS-CoV-2 Testing Using a Heat Lysis Protocol for Respiratory Specimens
title_full 369. Alternative Workflow for SARS-CoV-2 Testing Using a Heat Lysis Protocol for Respiratory Specimens
title_fullStr 369. Alternative Workflow for SARS-CoV-2 Testing Using a Heat Lysis Protocol for Respiratory Specimens
title_full_unstemmed 369. Alternative Workflow for SARS-CoV-2 Testing Using a Heat Lysis Protocol for Respiratory Specimens
title_short 369. Alternative Workflow for SARS-CoV-2 Testing Using a Heat Lysis Protocol for Respiratory Specimens
title_sort 369. alternative workflow for sars-cov-2 testing using a heat lysis protocol for respiratory specimens
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8690603/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab466.570
work_keys_str_mv AT yadavmeghna 369alternativeworkflowforsarscov2testingusingaheatlysisprotocolforrespiratoryspecimens
AT martineztiffany 369alternativeworkflowforsarscov2testingusingaheatlysisprotocolforrespiratoryspecimens
AT regoliisabel 369alternativeworkflowforsarscov2testingusingaheatlysisprotocolforrespiratoryspecimens
AT hernandezosvaldo 369alternativeworkflowforsarscov2testingusingaheatlysisprotocolforrespiratoryspecimens
AT lephuong 369alternativeworkflowforsarscov2testingusingaheatlysisprotocolforrespiratoryspecimens
AT carolanheather 369alternativeworkflowforsarscov2testingusingaheatlysisprotocolforrespiratoryspecimens
AT brownbrad 369alternativeworkflowforsarscov2testingusingaheatlysisprotocolforrespiratoryspecimens
AT mengekaren 369alternativeworkflowforsarscov2testingusingaheatlysisprotocolforrespiratoryspecimens